Review: Mackenzie’s Mountain, by Linda Howard

Nov 13 2010 Published by under Reviews

Mackenzie’s Mountain — the first* of five books in a series about half Scottish/half Indian men in Wyoming — was first published as a Silhouette Intimate Moments in 1989 (but I did not have to tell you that: the white shirt tucked in to belted stonewashed jeans and mullet did all my talking for me, didn’t it? Who knew Richard Marx posed for romance covers back in the day?) The series includes: 1)Mackenzie’s Mountain, 2)Mackenzie’s Mission, 3)Mackenzie’s Pleasure, 4)Mackenzie’s Magic and 5)A Game of Chance.  I purchased a four book bundle for the Kindle for $9.99 (it lacks Mackenzie’s Magic for some reason). There is a complete bundle for $13.17 . (*I think. Some sites put it third. Can anyone confirm?).

MMtn is one of Howard’s first books — maybe her fifth or sixth — and she has since had enormous success, publishing best selling single title romances in the dozens. Of course, it took me a long time to obtain that information because Howard does not have her own web page. I’ve read only a few of her books (After the Night, Cry No More, Mr. Perfect, and Death Angel). This author is a definite mixed bag for me, because she favors two elements that are not my favorite in romance: alpha heroes and plots involving violence against women (serial killers, rapists and the like). This book also has some problematic elements (a TSTL heroine, for example) but overall, Mackenzie’s Mountain was a fun and worthwhile romance read.

As MMtn begins, we meet Mary Elizabeth Potter, age 27, who has recently moved from Savannah to Ruth, Wyoming to work as a high school teacher. She notices that one of the students — Joe Mackenzie –  has  dropped out. Before the reader has had time to ponder how the description of Mary as a sheltered, mousy “old maid” squares with a cross country move to a strange town “for the excitement of a different way of life”, she’s off. It’s winter time in Wyoming — bitterly cold, and they’ve just had another substantial snowfall — but Mary, who is described as “sensible” no fewer than a half dozen times in the first chapter, decides to set off for Joe’s mountaintop home in light clothing, anklet socks, and rear wheel drive. She breaks down and attempts to walk the rest of the way.

Joe’s father Wolf — part Comanche, part Scottish (there are no Comanches in Wyoming, BTW), huge and brawny, with silky dark hair to his shoulders and eagle like features, shows up and a nearly frostbitten Mary is carried into his big black truck, and brought to this house, where he partially disrobes and warms her up. Mary, who has described herself as “respectable” (when trying to locate the word “horny” in her memory bank, she refers to it as “that awful term she had heard one of her students use once”) is making out with Wolf before the coffee is brewed.

Wolf trains quarter horses and is fine with Joe’s quitting school and working for him.  I thought this might be a big conflict with Mary’s desire that Joe finish school, but Wolf accedes immediately to Mary’s request to tutor Joe. The conflict turns out to be between the Mackenzies and the townspeople of Ruth, whose anti-Indian prejudices were so open, unapologetic, uniform, and hostile, I had a hard time believing the action took place any time after 1950. Wolf is a Viet Nam vet, and Joe, who is 16 at the time of the story, was born while Joe served. But Viet Nam was a long conflict, so that doesn’t narrow it down too much. There are no cell phones or 911, and Wolf asks Mary if she is a “one of those women’s libbers”, so I am thinking mid 1970s. Howard throws in a wrongful rape conviction — and time served –  to add fuel to the anti-Wolf fire, but all in all I felt the “angry townspeople/ social outcast” element of the story was not portrayed with much subtlety.

Wolf and Mary’s relationship gallops forward in a very pleasing and compelling way, with one fantastic consummation in a rainstorm scene involving a drenched to the skin Wolf standing outside a screen door. It’s a classic tale of the tiny, mousy, virginal heroine who turns out to be made of steel, and the brooding, brawny tough guy hero who turns out to have a lot of trouble facing his fears. However, as I mentioned above, the conflict is mostly external, not just with the townsfolk, but with a rapist on the loose who attacks Mary. I wasn’t prepared to label Mary TSTL over anklet-gate, but when she decides to use herself as bait for the rapist, there’s no other way I can describe her “plan”:

She didn’t know what she was going to do, other than parade through Ruth on the off chance that her presence might trigger another attack. And then what? She didn’t know.

This was an undeniably compelling and fun read, but of course, I had a number of problems with some of the implicit — and explicit — associations involving women, Indians, rapists, and persons with cognitive disabilities: Mary is a “kitten”, and Wolf is frequently described as a “caged beast”, or “savage”. In what is supposed to mark a moment of deep self-understanding, Wolf thinks,

he was a half-breed; his spirit was strong and uncomplicated, his instincts close to those of both races. With other women he had sex; with Mary, he mated.

Assumptions that the rapist is “an outsider” ,and lines like, “A rapist was warped, so his logic would be warped” indicate no understanding of the ubiquity of rape by friends, lovers, spouses, and acquaintances, who integrate quite well into society, or the fact that there is no “type” of rapist. That the rapist turns out to be developmentally delayed — and this makes sense to everyone — also relies in part on stereotypes of the mentally ill as violent (although again, as with the “half breed” stuff, Howard throws in an Indian-hating mother as a secondary cause of rapism). I didn’t even like Mary’s teaching philosophy: “He was hungry for knowledge and absorbed it like a dry sponge.”*headdesk*

Reviewers refer to this book as “hot”, but there were plenty of euphemisms. My favorite had to be: “the powerful jetting of completion.”

But I liked Mackenzie’s Mountain, overall. It was well plotted, with an interesting setting, and the romance was satisfying. Howard’s writing seems spare to me, yet she can really nail emotions, despite her economy. Plus, I feel as though I have polished off another building block of the genre.

19 responses so far

Monday Morning Stepback: Hasty, rambling and ill advised edition

Aug 16 2010 Published by under Monday Morning Stepback

The weekly links, opinions and personal updates post. Now with 25% more opinions.

1. Links of interest

Why Girly Jobs Don’t Pay Well, from the New York Times

A Kinder Gentler Vampire, from Smart Pop Books, which offers free essays daily from their books on pop culture. In this essay,  author Vera Mazarian contends that True Blood’s Bill Compton breaks the following mold:

Because, face it,” they concluded, “He’s one of a kind, a noble, nice-guy vampire, with a Scary Dangerous Façade. But underneath, he’s controlling himself—unlike all those other amoral crazy vamps. Okay, maybe he’s a bit on edge. Maybe his psycho brakes need new pads and drums and rotors. But—just look at all that sexy willpower!

“Furthermore, he loves—truly, madly, deeply. But his love is always problematic. Even when our heroine is willing (as a rule, the leading lady fantasizes about jumping his undead bones even while putting up her own Scary Dangerous Façade), he absolutely must deny himself any pleasure. Because what better way to torture a hero than to introduce sexual repression, or even insist on abstinence?”

From Teleread, would you like a vintage book cover for your ereader?

I have been very remiss in failing to link to the excellent series of posts on Georgette Heyer over at Austenprose which is running all month long with reviews, discussions, the works.  Check out Why We Love To Read and Re-Read Georgette Heyer: A birthday Tribute.

I have also been remiss in not notifying any of you who haven’t heard that the first issue of the Journal of Popular Romance Studies is out. Laura Vivanco at Teach Me Tonight has links and other info. One neat thing is that you can read all the articles for free online as well as comment. I serve as a peer reviewer and write book reviews for the JPRS, and hope very much to submit an essay to before the year is out.

This Wilson Quarterly article has been making the rounds in my circles: America: Land of Loners?:

Americans, plugged in and on the move, are confiding in their pets, their computers, and their spouses. What they need is to rediscover the value of friendship.

Friendship has also suffered from the remorseless eroticization of human relations that was bequeathed to us by Sigmund Freud. The culture stands particularly ready to sexualize men’s friendships since the gay liberation movement mercifully swept away taboos against discussing same-sex relationships. In 2005 The New York Times laid claim to coining the term “man date” in a story—under a woman’s byline—about the anxiety two straight men supposedly experience if they brave a restaurant or museum together and run the risk that people will think they are gay. The “bromance” theme, once strictly a collegiate sport among scholars scouring the letters of passionate 19th-century friends for signs of physical intimacy, has since made its way into popular culture. The pathetic state of male friendship—and the general suspicion that men who seek close friends might be looking for something more—was captured in last year’s film I Love You, Man, in which a guy decides to get married, realizes he has no one to be his best man, and must embark on a series of “man dates” to find one.

I must be the last person in the world to hear about the Smart Chicks Kick It tour, consisting of 18 YA writers whose books feature strong capable heroines, including Melissa Marr, in September, starting in Texas and ending in Ontario (from Arts and Letters Daily). I had a long talk with my friend this weekend, who is a national expert on literacy, especially adolescent literacy, and we kept having this disconnect, where I would say “YA/girls/romance/genre/UF/SFF” and she would be talking about books I had never heard of, many with male protagonists. Clearly we were coming from two very different places. She has promised me that I can interview her for a post, so that’s forthcoming.

Lurv a La Mode is asking Where Do You stand on Rape in Fantasy and UF?

Sandy’s All About Romance column, Speaking of Audiobooks, is excellent. Check out Romance Audio Bests By Author. I am currently listening to — and loving — Jo Beverley’s The Dragon’s Bride, narrated by Simon Preble, who has the virtue of not trying to mimic female voices.

My Experiences with Disability in the Kink Community, at FWD (Feminists with Disabilities). Did you know that some people think the leather community is not as accommodating of chemical sensitivities as it could be? Or that the post author would actually have to warn commenters that this is not the place to talk about how kinky it is to have sex with people who are disabled? I didn’t until I read this post.

At Critical Mass, word of a review of a book I want to read: Bring on the Books for Everybody: how literary culture became popular culture, by Jim Collins, a professor of film and tv at Notre Dame. Here’s part of the blurb:

Bring on the Books for Everybody is an engaging assessment of the robust popular literary culture that has developed in the United States during the past two decades. Jim Collins describes how a once solitary and print-based experience has become an exuberantly social activity, enjoyed as much on the screen as on the page. Fueled by Oprah’s book club, Miramax film adaptations, superstore bookshops, and new technologies such as the Kindle digital reader, literary fiction has been transformed into bestselling, high-concept entertainment. Collins highlights the infrastructural and cultural changes that have given rise to a flourishing reading public at a time when the future of the book has been called into question. Book reading, he claims, has not become obsolete; it has become integrated into popular visual media.

The Washington Post on how writers today use transparent pesudonyms. (h/t Literary Saloon)

2. Opinions

a) Like anyone with a book blog, I get offers of free books. I usually delete these emails without comment. But the one I got today was so clueless, I had to share.

Clearly not realizing that everyone else just offers you the damn book, she writes:

I have a challenge for you. It involves writing, reading, and communicating. If you rock it you get a free book. The challenge? Check out my website. Subscribe to my blog. Email me.

You get a free book, my novel.

And how does she entice me? By telling me “you’re my friend, obviously” (I have never heard of this person), and then informing me that “this novel is not available anywhere but my hard drive”.

SOLD!!!

b) A review at All About Romance really annoyed me recently. It was a C+ review of Victoria Dahl’s historical A Little Bit Wild. Apparently the heroine likes physical pleasure. The reviewer is having none of this:

Being unapologetically lusty is bizarre enough

and

Double standard or not, I didn’t like it when she reveals she has dallied with more than a few men for no particular reason – luckily this eventually comes back to bite her in the butt.

I’m tempted to say those comments had no business being in the review, because they have little to do with the text. When I read an AAR review, because it is more of a professional website, I expect to read about the book, not the reviewer’s personal sexual ethics. On the other hand, maybe it’s just down to my distaste for the reviewer’s opinion.

c) The Linda Howard thing. After a spate of bad reviews. Linda Howard went on Facebook to say that she has been ill and that her books have suffered. I first learned of this through this discussion at Book Lovers Message Board, and then Jane at Dear Author posted about it.

Three things: (1) it is awful when anybody is sick, (2) but Howard’s claim that she is not talking about her health troubles to deflect criticism strikes me as disingenuous, and (3) the point of a review is to review books, not authors. Imagine how reviews would look if we had to take all these causal connections into account (not something Howard is suggesting we do, I realize)? “Sally Smith’s latest book really shows the effects of the fantastic sex she has been having with her new husband! Those sex scenes are hot!” or “Well, I met that author at RWA, and she’s a real asshat, so I am not surprised her heroine is a bitch.”

d) A comment in the DA thread by Devon annoyed me:

For what it’s worth, menopause can also do a number on creativity and writing style. Maybe that would explain–in part–why many of the older writers we used to love have dried up creatively?

Yeah, they shoot horses, don’t they?

On the blog this week

A guest post on Twitter dos and don’ts for authors and others (maybe I should have called this “Rant Week!!”)

Tuesday, the Dracula post, which promises to be long and unwieldy.

Then… who knows.

HAPPY WEEK!

19 responses so far

Review: Death Angel, Linda Howard

Oct 02 2008 Published by under Reviews

Cover Comment: It’s perfect!

Setting: Present day USA, both New York City and more rural parts of the US.

Series?: No, I don’t think so.

Hero and Heroine: Drea, beautiful, but incredibly insecure blonde drug lord’s moll, and The Assassin, ______________  , ________________ , ______________ (can you describe him in a way that differentiates him from, say, Halloween’s Michael Myers? I can’t.)

Plot: Drug lord gives girlfriend to a hitman as a prize. Girlfriend’s bout of sex with said assassin provides catalyst for decision to leave drug lord, stealing his money in the process. Drug lord hires assassin to kill girlfriend. Strange doings ensue. (that’s as spoiler free as I can make it).

Word on the Web [Warning: most reviews of this book have spoilers. AztecLady did the best in avoiding them]:

Jennie at Dear Author has written what I consider to be the best take on this book, but be warned, it’s very spoilerish and highly critical.

Jane, Dear Author, B-

Azteclady, Karen Knows Best, 9

Lelsey, The Romance Reader, 4 hearts

Book Binge, 4.5 out of 5

Jan, Reading, Etc. B+

Romance Rookie, B

The Rewrite Cafe, very positive

Thrifty Reader, B-

AAR Thread here.

Amazon.com, 4 stars after 101 reviews (but very divided: 31 were 3 or fewer stars)

The Racy Romance Review:

This book is not for you if:

Continue Reading »

4 responses so far

Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: