My romance reading has mostly been confined to late twentieth and early 21st century titles, but of course the genre did not spring up ex nihilo. Pam Regis’s A Natural History of the Romance Novel (2003) situates contemporary romance within a tradition she traces back to 1740′s Pamela. Among the earlier books Regis analyzes is Jane Eyre, along with Pride and Prejudice, Framley Parsonage, and A Room With a View). Regis chose them for their chronological distribution, representation of different styles of English literature, popularity with critics and public alike, quality, and vivid heroines. She writes, in a statement that may not be widely accepted by today’s readers, “In a genre whose focus is the heroine, novels portraying intense, vigorous women provide the purest account of the genre.” (p. 55).
Regis departs from earlier efforts to define the romance novel by focusing on narrative elements (courtship and betrothal) rather than themes (“love relationship”). According to Regis, a romance novel is a work of prose fiction that tells the story of the courtship and betrothal of one or more heroines. It has eight elements, and Jane Eyre has all of them.
1. Society Defined: near novel’s beginning; probably in some way flawed.
Society, especially Jane’s place in it, is a major preoccupation of the novel
2. The Meeting: usually near beginning — hero and heroine meet.
A gripping meeting that brings together so many elements, including the Gothic, romantic, and feminist elements of the novel. An enigmatic man on horseback literally falls at our heroine’s feet!
3. The Barrier: series of scenes — reasons why they cannot marry.
The biggest one, obviously, is that Rochester is already married. Also class and gender issues (her I mean the internal barrier presented by Jane’s reluctance to be a charity case, even in the context of love). And then the fake barriers Rochester erects, as in his courtship of Blanche Ingram.
4. The Attraction: scene or series of scenes — reason they should marry.
Like an old school romance (by which I think is normally meant a romance written in the 1970s through the 1980s), we only directly get Jane’s version of falling in love. But how wonderfully Bronte captures the complex, uncontrollable, emotion, based on both things that can be named, particular qualities (his respectful treatment of her, his kindness, etc.), but also on the primal or inchoate, as when Jane says “he is not of their kind. I believe he is of mine; — I am sure he is, — I feel akin to him, — I understand the language of his countenance and movements: though rank and wealth sever us widely.”
Rochester holds his own, though, as in chapter 23 when he describes their connection as a “string somewhere under my left ribs tightly and inexplicably knotted to a similar string situated in the corresponding quarter of your little frame”.
They become beautiful in each other’s eyes, in that mysterious way love makes possible.
5. The Declaration: scene or scenes in which hero declares love for heroine and vice versa.
Chapter 23, baby. Jane says “whereever you are is my home — my only home”, and later Rochester says, “You-you strange-almost unearthly thing!– I love as my own flesh.”
6. Point of Ritual Death: moment when union between hero and heroine seems absolutely impossible.
For Regis, this is the moment when Jane, after feeling Rochester, finds herself on the steps of the cottage at Marsh end and thinks, “I can but die”. I would personally put it at the moment after Jane learns about “Bertha”, and is mechanically taking off her wedding dress and pondering what it all means (“I looked at my love … never more could it turn to him”.) Jane’s taking leave of Rochester might be another.
7. The Recognition: point when author gives new information overcoming barrier.
Jane dream Rochester needs her. She returns to Thornfield to find it burned down, and Rochester’s wife perished.
8. Betrothal: hero asks heroine to marry him and she accepts (or vice versa).
We get two of these.
Regis’s discussion of the novel is brief (as indeed is every discussion in this book. It is quite focused.). She notes that Jane Eyre showcases the flexibility of the form, and incorporates elements from other genres, such as the quest-plot, the northern (England) Gothic, Bildungroman, feminist themes. She notes the overriding theme of freedom — Jane’s — which supports a claim against the supposed natural antipathy between feminism and the romance novel to which she has already devoted a whole chapter. Indeed Brontë “finds the romance novel form a natural medium for this theme” (p. 87).
For Regis, the novel is all about freedom — not only Jane’s, but Rochester’s which is bestowed by Jane herself. Does Jane achieve “real equality”? Critics are split, with some arguing that while there may be a “mythical” equality, when romance triumphs, equality is necessarily sacrificed. Others note that Jane herself earned her triumphs, and was not saved by a prince. The latter is Regis’s view. As she puts it, Jane “is profoundly bourgeois, but bourgeois values of independence, individualism, and freedom have been the goals of her quest: her marriage to Rochester is simply an extension of these, not a concession to literary form” (p. 91).
[What does "feminist" mean in discussions of Jane Eyre? In Regis, it seems to refer to a popular contemporary conception of feminism. Was Brontë influenced by the feminism of her day?]
A partial list of random things that remind me of contemporary romance novels:
- Anachronisms (as in the apparent conflict between Jane’s comment that Sir Walter Scott’s Marmion is a new book (published in 1808), but then reading Byron’s The Corsair (1814). (see interesting discussion of chronology here).
- Rochester’s diminutive pet names for Jane, as when he calls her “my little sceptic.”
- The heroine as an orphan, as vulnerable, as isolated.
- The dark, brooding hero who is older, richer, and more powerful (her employer) [Regis at one point claims that "Jane controls the courtship from the platform of her profession". (p. 88) I found that very hard to see.]
- In general, the power issues between hero and heroine
- The heroine’s lack of bodily control (control of passions) around Rochester
- The false courtships
- Rochester’s guests and the scenes when Jane is forced to sit with them reminded me of Patricia Gaffney’s To Have and to Hold.
- The hero in disguise!
A partial list of things that diverge from contemporary (by which I mean, published today) romance novels:
- The hero is married
- The extended courtship of Jane by another man
- The emphasis on Jane’s journey, including her childhood
- Jane’s religious identity
A few of many things worth thinking a lot more about:
- Jane’s art — is it just a plot propeller? Or is it more significant? Does it express her self-image?
- Christian morality — A contemporary reviewer wrote that “No Christian grace is perceptible upon her.” (more reviews here)
- Postcolonial readings. How is to to read Jane Eyre after reading Wide Sargasso Sea? Can you root at all for Jane and Rochester the way one is supposed to in a romance?
Finally, did I like it?
I would say I appreciated it more than I enjoyed it. Like any good genre reader, much of my pleasure came from situating the text within the genre. As a moral philosopher, I enjoyed Jane’s struggles with principle and emotions and Christian morality. But as a reader simpliciter (whatever that is)? I wasn’t transported by the prose, although I found the plot gripping (despite knowing how it was all going to unfold). There were stretches of slogging. Glad I read it.
Tell me what you think:
Have you read Jane Eyre? Did you like it?
If you read romance, and this IS a romance, why wouldn’t you consider reading it?
They say this is one of those books that, while being widely assigned by English teachers in the US, is also pretty popular outside the classroom. Why is that?
Stacey Agdern is an award winning bookseller whose achievements have been cited in Publishers Weekly. She is also one of Barbara Vey’s WW Ladies, reviews Manga and Graphic Novels for Romantic Times Magazine and has given presentations about working with booksellers at regional and national conferences. She can be found on twitter at 