Archive for the 'Reading Reflection' category

Romance Roots: Jane Eyre

May 26 2010 Published by under Genre musings, Reading Reflection, Romance Roots

My romance reading has mostly been confined to late twentieth and early 21st century titles, but of course the genre did not spring up ex nihilo. Pam Regis’s A Natural History of the Romance Novel (2003) situates contemporary romance within a tradition she traces back to 1740′s Pamela. Among the earlier books Regis analyzes is Jane Eyre, along with Pride and Prejudice, Framley Parsonage, and A Room With a View). Regis chose them for their chronological distribution, representation of different styles of English literature, popularity with critics and public alike, quality, and vivid heroines. She writes, in a statement that may not be widely accepted by today’s readers, “In a genre whose focus is the heroine, novels portraying intense, vigorous women provide the purest account of the genre.” (p. 55).

Regis departs from earlier efforts to define the romance novel by focusing on narrative elements (courtship and betrothal) rather than themes (“love relationship”). According to Regis, a romance novel is a work of prose fiction that tells the story of the courtship and betrothal of one or more heroines. It has eight elements, and Jane Eyre has all of them.

1. Society Defined: near novel’s beginning; probably in some way flawed.

Society, especially Jane’s place in it,  is a major preoccupation of the novel

2. The Meeting: usually near beginning — hero and heroine meet.

A gripping meeting that brings together so many elements, including the Gothic, romantic, and feminist elements of the novel. An enigmatic man on horseback literally falls at our heroine’s feet!

3. The Barrier: series of scenes — reasons why they cannot marry.

The biggest one, obviously, is that Rochester is already married. Also class and gender issues (her I mean the internal barrier presented by Jane’s reluctance to be a charity case, even in the context of love). And then the fake barriers Rochester erects, as in his courtship of Blanche Ingram.

4. The Attraction: scene or series of scenes — reason they should marry.

Like an old school romance (by which I think is normally meant a romance written in the 1970s through the 1980s), we only directly get Jane’s version of falling in love. But how wonderfully Bronte captures the complex, uncontrollable, emotion, based on both things that can be named, particular qualities (his respectful treatment of her, his kindness, etc.), but also on the primal or inchoate, as when Jane says “he is not of their kind. I believe he is of mine; — I am sure he is, — I feel akin to him, — I understand the language of his countenance and movements: though rank and wealth sever us widely.”

Rochester holds his own, though, as in chapter 23 when he describes their connection as a “string somewhere under my left ribs tightly and inexplicably knotted to a similar string situated in the corresponding quarter of your little frame”.

They become beautiful in each other’s eyes, in that mysterious way love makes possible.

5. The Declaration: scene or scenes in which hero declares love for heroine and vice versa.

Chapter 23, baby. Jane says “whereever you are is my home — my only home”, and later Rochester says, “You-you strange-almost unearthly thing!– I love as my own flesh.”

6. Point of Ritual Death: moment when union between hero and heroine seems absolutely impossible.

For Regis, this is the moment when Jane, after feeling Rochester, finds herself on the steps of the cottage at Marsh end and thinks, “I can but die”. I would personally put it at the moment after Jane learns about “Bertha”, and is mechanically taking off her wedding dress and pondering what it all means (“I looked at my love … never more could it turn to him”.) Jane’s taking leave of Rochester might be another.

7. The Recognition: point when author gives new information overcoming barrier.

Jane dream Rochester needs her. She returns to Thornfield to find it burned down, and Rochester’s wife perished.

8. Betrothal: hero asks heroine to marry him and she accepts (or vice versa).

We get two of these.

Regis’s discussion of the novel is brief (as indeed is every discussion in this book. It is quite focused.). She notes that Jane Eyre showcases the flexibility of the form, and incorporates elements from other genres, such as the quest-plot, the northern (England) Gothic, Bildungroman, feminist themes. She notes the overriding theme of freedom — Jane’s — which supports a claim against the supposed natural antipathy between feminism and the romance novel to which she has already devoted a whole chapter. Indeed Brontë “finds the romance novel form a natural medium for this theme” (p. 87).

For Regis, the novel is all about freedom — not only Jane’s, but Rochester’s which is bestowed by Jane herself. Does Jane achieve “real equality”? Critics are split, with some arguing that while there may be a “mythical” equality, when romance triumphs, equality is necessarily sacrificed. Others note that Jane herself earned her triumphs, and was not saved by a prince.  The latter is Regis’s view. As she puts it, Jane “is profoundly bourgeois, but bourgeois values of independence, individualism, and freedom have been the goals of her quest: her marriage to Rochester is simply an extension of these, not a concession to literary form” (p. 91).

[What does "feminist" mean in discussions of Jane Eyre? In Regis, it seems to refer to a popular contemporary conception of feminism. Was Brontë influenced by the feminism of her day?]

A partial list of random things that remind me of contemporary romance novels:

  • Anachronisms (as in the apparent conflict between Jane’s comment that Sir Walter Scott’s Marmion is a new book (published in 1808), but then reading Byron’s The Corsair (1814). (see interesting discussion of chronology here).
  • Rochester’s diminutive pet names for Jane, as when he calls her “my little sceptic.”
  • The heroine as an orphan, as vulnerable, as isolated.
  • The dark, brooding hero who is older, richer, and more powerful (her employer) [Regis at one point claims that "Jane controls the courtship from the platform of her profession". (p. 88) I found that very hard to see.]
  • In general, the power issues between hero and heroine
  • The heroine’s lack of bodily control (control of passions) around Rochester
  • The false courtships
  • Rochester’s guests and the scenes when Jane is forced to sit with them reminded me of Patricia Gaffney’s To Have and to Hold.
  • The hero in disguise!

A partial list of things that diverge from contemporary (by which I mean, published today) romance novels:

  • The hero is married
  • The extended courtship of Jane by another man
  • The emphasis on Jane’s journey, including her childhood
  • Jane’s religious identity

A few of many things worth thinking a lot more about:

  • Jane’s art — is it just a plot propeller? Or is it more significant? Does it express her self-image?
  • Christian morality — A contemporary reviewer wrote that “No Christian grace is perceptible upon her.” (more reviews here)
  • Postcolonial readings. How is to to read Jane Eyre after reading Wide Sargasso Sea? Can you root at all for Jane and Rochester the way one is supposed to in a romance?

Finally, did I like it?

I would say I appreciated it more than I enjoyed it. Like any good genre reader, much of my pleasure came from situating the text within the genre. As a moral philosopher, I enjoyed Jane’s struggles with principle and emotions and Christian morality. But as a reader simpliciter (whatever that is)? I wasn’t transported by the prose, although I found the plot gripping (despite knowing how it was all going to unfold). There were stretches of slogging. Glad I read it.

Tell me what you think:

Have you read Jane Eyre? Did you like it?

If you read romance, and this IS a romance, why wouldn’t you consider reading it?

They say this is one of those books that, while being widely assigned by English teachers in the US,  is also pretty popular outside the classroom. Why is that?

31 responses so far

A Jewish Reader Reflects on Never Deceive a Duke by Liz Carlyle

May 07 2010 Published by under Reading Reflection

I’m thrilled to present this guest post by Stacey Agdern. It never occurred to me that a romance novel could be an important part of a modern family’s practice of an ancient religious tradition, but it makes perfect sense now. Thank you, Stacey.

Stacey Agdern is an award winning bookseller whose achievements have been cited in Publishers Weekly.  She is also one of Barbara Vey’s WW Ladies, reviews Manga and Graphic Novels for Romantic Times Magazine and has given presentations about working with booksellers at regional and national conferences.  She can be found on twitter at @nystacey.

This year, my brother and sister-in-law decided that they wanted to add an element to our traditional Passover seder.  They suggested that the attendees bring with them a reading, a song, something that would elaborate on the themes of the holiday; anything from the Exodus to the greens on the seder plate.

It took no time at all for me to decide what I wanted to bring.  I make no secret of my admiration for Liz Carlyle’s Never Deceive a Duke and the way she deals with the theme of anti-semitism in regency England.  Especially since the hero of the story is one of few Jewish characters to be depicted in a historical romance novel (and in a leading role…).

The words used to describe the thematic path of the Exodus, the going out of Egypt, are “from degradation to dignity.”  But when I thought about things further, I realized that these words also described the character arc of the hero of Never Deceive a Duke. Not only from the slums of his youth to the wealth of his adulthood, but also, and more importantly for my purposes, his religious arc.

Yes.  His religious arc.  For the hero grows from a boy unwanted because he has a Jewish taint, to a man who finds comfort in the faith of his mother and the grandparents who loved him.  From Degradation to Dignity.

The notes below are what resulted from my mental ramblings.  The italicized passages are taken from the story, my notes and interpretations below.  I hope you find them thought-provoking.

From Degradation to Dignity: The Journey of Gabriel Ventnor aka Gareth Lloyd

Passover themes as explored in Liz Carlyle’s “Never Deceive a Duke”

By Stacey Agdern

Gabriel stood at a distance as the older boys played, kicking their ball along the swath of green.  He had seen them in Finsbury Circus before.  And he had seen the ball too; an amazingly round and bouncing sphere that skittered across the grass at lightening speed, and made a satisfying ‘thunk’ when kicked.

The smallest boy caught Gabriel’s eye and crooked a finger.  With a glance back at his dozing grandfather, Gabriel dashed onto the grass.

The boy held out the ball.  “We need a sixth,” he said.  “Can you kick?”

Gabriel nodded.  “I can kick.”

The biggest boy elbowed past him.  “Give it will,” he said, snatching the ball from between them.  “We ain’t playin with Jews.”

The time: The regency era

The place: England.

The facts:  Our Gabriel is the product of a mixed marriage between the son of an aristocratic family and a young Jewish woman.  He is loved by his parents and maternal grandparents.  But his father is a soldier, a major in the British army stationed in India.  So he is left with his mother and grandparents, ignored by his paternal relatives, subject to prejudice because of the ‘taint’ of his mother’s faith  As you can tell from the scene above, the anti-Semitism of regency England runs deep. It is accepted at all levels of society and passed down to children as young as those depicted in the scene.

“Well he looks sturdy enough,” mused the Duchess, cutting a glance at her husband.  “He does not appear to be wormy.  He seems appropriately humble.  And at least he is not swarthy.”

“No,” admitted the duke churlishly.  “He is Major Ventnor made over, thank god-those gangling legs and that gold-colored hair included.”

The duchess turned her back on the old woman who had brought the boy.  “Really, Warenham, what choice do we have here?” she murmured.  “We must ask ourselves, I think, what is the Christian thing to do? Your pardon, of course, Mrs. Gottfried.”  This last was tossed carelessly over her shoulder.”

On the death of his mother, father and maternal grandfather, his maternal grandmother is left with no choice but to seek help from his paternal relatives.   They despise the young boy, despite the fact he seems to look just like them.  Therein lies the fundamental problem with anti Semitism:  at its core, it’s a prejudice against something a person can’t see or touch.  As a result, it’s a rather difficult prejudice to fight, as Gabriel is learning here.

The church of St. George’s-in-the-East was a towering white edifice dwarfing everything which surrounded it.  Stark against the Sunday morning sun, the bell tower cast a shadow which ran all the way to Cannon street and right over Gabriel’s toes.

“Bubbe, I don’t like it,” he whispered, tugging at her hand.

“What is this?’I don’t like it?’ ” she chided.  “It’s a church, tatellah.  It is god’s house.”

“Not your god,” Gabriel muttered.

His grandmother squeezed his hand. “Gabriel, my child, you must learn to be a part of them, these English.  In a few years, you will be old enough for your Bar Mitzvah, yes?”

He narrowed one eyes suspiciously.  “The English don’t have them ,bubbe.”

“Oh yes, but they are called confirmations,” she answered.  “It was your mother’s dearest wish that you should have one.”

This scene is both controversial and rather important to Gabriel’s growth.  It is controversial because many readers believe that Jewish grandparents would not raise their grandson out of the faith.  But these comments come out of a modern view, products of a society where it is possible to live freely and openly as a Jew.  However, in Regency England, Jews could not attend university, sit in parliament and do many other things English citizens took for granted.  Therefore, it could be argued that Gabriel’s grandparents were acting purely with Gabriel’s survival and success in mind.  Any grandparent who loved their grandson would understand that.

It is important to Gabriel’s growth because it demonstrates how truly in-between both the ‘English’ and the Jewish world he is.  His loving maternal grandparents lived in a world he could not fully join, and the rest of the world didn’t really want him.

“Oy gevalt,” murmured his grandfather.  “Poor devil.”

Soon the commotion was gone.  Zayde grabbed Gabriel’s hand and hastened away.  The gang had vanished into the g loom.  “What did that man do, Zayde?”

“Drank too deep with men he did not know,” he said.  “The English need sailors and to the press gang, almost anyone is fair game.”

Later in his own life, Gabriel was sold to a press gang by his paternal relatives.  But thankfully, his story does not end there.  For us, it jumps ahead to a time where Gabriel is forced to confront his ghosts and his past.

“You are surprisingly knowledgeable, Gabriel, for one who did not worship the faith.”

They had started down the hill which lead to the pavilion and the small lake beyond.  Gareth found himself growing unaccountably tense.  “Everyone I knew, Antonia, was a Jew,” he said quietly.  “As a small boy, I had seen no other way.  And yet I was kept from being a Jew.”

“Do you believe what they believed?”  There was no hint of judgment in her voice, merely curiosity.

“Some days, Antonia, I don’t know what I believe.”  He paused to lift a wayward briar from Antonia’s path.  “For me, this isn’t even about faith.  It’s about a nurturing community of good and honest people.”

She ducked under the briar, then glanced toward him with a faint smile.  “Perhaps I understand better than you might imagine, Gabriel.”

Antonia has lived through the tragedy that brought Gabriel back to the central scene of his childhood pain; the death of her husband and child give him an unexpected and unwanted title.  And yet she finds herself listening to him when he explains the process of shiva, of mourning. She who has no reason to listen at all.

Even though this story covers a great deal more ground, Gabriel Gareth Ventnor’s journey from degradation to dignity serves as its core.  Thank you for listening.

32 responses so far

« Newer posts

Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: