Archive for: May, 2011

Monday Morning Stepback: Twitter, bestseller lists, voice, giveaway link

May 09 2011 Published by under Monday Morning Stepback

The Weekly Links, Opinion, and Personal Updates Post

Links of Interest, with embedded opinions

At Crowe’s Nest, Jenny Martin talks about voice, and gives fantastic examples of writing with and without voice, like this:

The surface was five feet away. His eyes widened with anxiety. He held his breath.

Vs.

Almost there. The surface and a lungful of air were just beyond his reach.

(via @BookishMagpie)

*****

For mother’s day, I enjoyed historian Stephanie Coontz’ Op-Ed in the NYT about the impact of feminism on stay at home mothers:

Contrary to myth, “The Feminine Mystique” and feminism did not represent the beginning of the decline of the stay-at-home mother, but a turning point that led to much stronger legal rights and “working conditions” for her.

Domestic violence rates have fallen sharply for all wives, employed or not. As late as 1980, approximately 30 percent of wives said their husbands did no housework at all. By 2000, only 16 percent of wives made that statement and almost one-third said their husbands did half of all housework, child care or both.

Most researchers agree that these changes were spurred by the entry of wives and mothers into the work force. But full-time homemakers have especially benefited from them.

As for linking to The Times, I will try to keep it to a minimum, given the paywall, which I have guiltily scaled.

*****

I’ve been enjoying posts, like this one on non romance series with strong romance arcs, from Romancing the Past, a group blog of Carina Press historical authors.

*****

Hilcia’s Impressions of a romance Reader is 2 years old, and she’s giving away 2 $25 gift certs to either Amazon or B&N (enter by May 15).

*****

Katiebabs of Babbling About Books wrote an interesting post on the rise of secondary gay romance in het romance.

*****

A lot of folks have been following the outing of erotic romance author and high school English teacher Judy Mays. In PW, Mays shares her feelings about recent events. The best part:

And, not to worry. I am not going to lose my teaching job over this.

*****

Tired of all those “demise of publishing”, “demise of print books”, or “demise of reading” articles? Here’s a slightly less stale topic: The Demise of the Ereader, at HuffPo.

I kind of like it that my Kindle does basically one thing. It’s harder to get distracted.

*****

And about the Kindle … Jane Litte of Dear Author has a post on Top Kindle Tips and Tricks. Readers also added their faves in the comments.

*****

Speaking of Dear Author, if you are interested, you can now find out every week what readers of that site and Smart Bitches are buying, as this post explains. I’m not so enthused about this, myself, mainly because my Twitter stream was already clogged with a lot of author bragging about various obscure “best seller lists”, and I’ve already seen a stream of braggy tweets about this new one. If, as authors have said on Twitter, the difference between 10 or 20 places on the Amazon digital list is only a couple of digital copies, how small must the difference between being number 1 on the DA/SBTB list and number 10 — or 20? — be? I don’t know, because that information has not been provided. Anyway, I am sure others will really enjoy it.

****

As you can probably tell from my comments above, I’ve been feeling a bit put upon by authors on Twitter lately. And not even authors I follow! It was from Media Bistro that I found out that author Ilona Andrews tweeted:

“Please do not tweet reviews of my work at me. Thank you.”

I normally do not Tweet reviews to authors myself, because I feel it is kind of attention begging, although there are exceptions. I figure if someone likes the review, she’ll mention it to her followers. But it rubbed me the wrong way to be told what to tweet and what not to tweet by Andrews. My first thoughts were: “Wait. I have to read your constant self-promo, your RTs of the great things other people have said about you, your contests, your release day (self) congrats, your bestseller bragging, your mutual friend pimping. And now you are telling me when I am allowed to post a tweet which @mentions a review of your work? Because you apparently cannot exercise enough self-control not to click the link?” Gah.

Oh dear. Looking at the tone of the last two items, I think it may be time for a Twitter hiatus.

*****

Foz Meadows on a topic I would never have considered otherwise, Schools in YA Fiction.

The point being, high school is problematic, and regardless of differing opinions on why that is or how it might be fixed, the simple assertion that problems do exist is not a controversial statement. And so, while reading a book about a spy academy for teenage girls, it occurred to me to wonder why some types of school are held up as interesting, awesome and excellent in YA novels, while others either blend into the background or, at worst, are depicted as hateful, prisonesque institutions. At first glance, this is something of a ridiculous question: YA is about teenagers, teenagers go to school – is it any wonder, therefore, that depictions of education in YA should vary, too? Well, no: but probing a little deeper, it’s possible to discern an interesting pattern about the types of school on offer.

*****

Yet another publisher book site for readers will arrive this summer, Bookish, a joint endeavor of Hachette Book Group, Penguin Group (USA), and Simon & Schuster, and AOL Huffington Post Media Group (via GalleyCat). I have no idea what this means:

Arianna Huffington explained that they will “use our multimedia, social, and community engagement tools to help connect our readers with authors and their books. And we’ll highlight this content through our entire network and hyperlocal sites.”

After spending a few minutes last week trying to figure out HuffPo’s new Patch, I don’t think “local” means what Arianna Huffington thinks it means.

*****

By now readers will have heard of Amazon’s new romance publishing imprint, Montlake. All About Romance posted an email from Connie Brockway, who will be their launch author.

I have never read Brockway, and consider this a huge hole in my genre experience.

*****

Personal

I’m in the middle of a Rachel Gibson glom, or I would be if I weren’t so busy. I picked an old Catherine Coulter, another author I’ve not read, at the library book sale Saturday. I’m finishing up grading, and preparing for a talk at the hospital on popular culture and medical ethics on Wednesday. It’ll be a version of the talk I gave on vampires in October, but since it’s for CMEs (continuing medical education credits), I have to make it relevant to patient care. I’m thinking something along the lines of, “Six ways to tell if your patient is a vampire…”

HAPPY WEEK!

31 responses so far

Review: Any Man of Mine, by Rachel Gibson

May 07 2011 Published by under Reviews

Any Man of Mine is the sixth book in Rachel Gibson’s contemporary romance series about a fictional pro hockey team, the Seattle Chinooks. I received my copy free from the publisher via Net Galley in exchange for writing a review. I’ve never read Gibson, and in fact, only requested this book from Net Galley to see if I would get it, Gibson being a NY Times best selling author published on a major press (this was during the discussion we having about Net Galley getting stricter). I’m not sure why I hadn’t read Gibson before. Perhaps the covers looked too chick lit. At any rate, requesting AMOM turned me on to a new author I really enjoy. I’ve already read book 2 of the series (See Jane Score), and plan to read the rest, probably in rapid succession.

Gibson writes in the tradition of Susan Elizabeth Phillips’ Chicago Stars series*: rich, charming pro athletes, happily single and enjoying the perks of stardom, who strongly prefer sleeping with long-legged, large breasted and empty headed women who agree to their terms (“no strings”).  The heroine suddenly appears on the scene, almost always a fish out of water in the sports world, and although she is all wrong — usually short and homey looking, sensible, borderline bitchy — he finds himself unable to stop thinking about her. He doesn’t want commitment — usually it’s because he is too focused on his career, but sometimes the heroine digs deeper and finds family of origin issues — but he can’t stay away, despite knowing this is not the kind of woman he can just sleep with and abandon. The sexual tension is very high as they fight their attraction, albeit for different reasons — she because she doesn’t want to get hurt, he because he doesn’t want to hurt her. Sometimes the heroine’s job — perhaps reporter or PR person — is threatened by all these romantic hijinks, but such concerns usually have all the weight of a down feather. Usually the character arcs in these books are strongly skewed to the heroes, but occasionally the heroine will have to change a bit too, maybe by giving up preconceived ideas about “dumb jocks”, or recognizing that she herself has made choices that have kept her single. (*although I think SEP’s books are more complex, and address more wide ranging themes.)

I absolutely love this kind of story, despite all of the problems in inherent in it from a political perspective, and AMOM was no exception. Folks have been talking lately about sexual fantasy in romance, and defending the right of readers to enjoy books with things like rape fantasy in them. Well, I look at this kind of book in a similar way: I would never, in real life, be attracted to a man like one of these guys, and I don’t, IRL, condone what he does, but as a fictional character, it’s a different — er — story.  AMOM is the kind of book I whip through, completely enjoying it, only later thinking about the problems.

There are two things about AMOM that complicate the trajectory I described above: (1) the hero and heroine were married, and (2) they have a 5 year old child, Connor. Here’s the misleading blurb:

Autumn Haven’s Las Vegas “to-do” list said to catch a show and play the slots—not wake up married to a sexy jerk like Sam LeClaire. The first moment she saw him eyeing her like a luscious piece of the dessert buffet, her usually responsible self told her to run. And she did—right into the wildest fantasy weekend of her life. But Monday morning jolted her back to reality, and before she could say “pass the coffee,” Sam was gone.

Now a successful wedding planner, Autumn hasn’t clapped eyes on the heartbreaking hockey superstar for over two years . . . until she organizes his teammate’s “Special Day,” where Sam makes a big play to pick up where he left off! But she has vowed any man of hers plays for keeps. Is Sam the man for her or does she banish him to the sin bin forever?

If you missed “wedding” and “child” in that, don’t worry: it wasn’t there. And it’s those two things, especially the child, that have made so many readers absolutely detest Sam and dislike this book. Sam is, on the scale of cretin to human being, much closer to cretin. His attitude towards women sucks (he’s a terrified his son will show feminine qualities, for example. Quelle horreur!), he drives a big gas guzzling truck — and leaves it running when parked — just to prove his manhood, and on and on and on. Gibson definitely put the pedal to the machismo metal on this character, but I personally find Sam very much in the mold of a certain kind of romance hero whom I encounter often. The focus on career, the no strings attached sex, the partying, the dislike of smart capable women like the heroine, the demeaning of the heroine’s career — this is so par for the course, I’m amazed anybody mentions it. I just read See Jane Score, and Luc, the hero of that book, has all of the same attitudes and beliefs that Sam has, albeit with a little less of Sam’s special misogynistic flair.

What makes Sam a tougher hero to redeem in the end is not those things, but that they are combined with the fact that he married Autumn in Vegas, abandoned her, and has proved to be — in Autumn’s eyes at least –  a terrible father for five years. As you might guess, this is a bit of a downbeat book, although Gibson takes us in flashbacks to Vegas, and I thought she did a great job showing the excitement of their whirlwind romance. Whether AMOM works for you will depend on how well you think Gibson portrays Sam’s change from absentee dad to devoted family man. Many readers complained that it was too abrupt, but I found it believable enough. I was also perhaps a but more sympathetic to Sam in a number of ways. It was Sam’s bad luck to have unprotected sex with a romance heroine who, unlike most real women in of our day and age, has never heard of the word abortion despite not being religious, being broke, single, and trying to start a business. I don’t blame Sam for divorcing her — it was a booze fueled 72 hours — or for asking her for a paternity test, although doing so via lawyers was very low.

He’s given more than adequate financial support to his child (it’s not his fault if Autumn is a cheapskate and prefers to live in a run down split level when she can afford much more), and when it comes to parenting, he’s done what he could, given his utter lack of maturity. Sam adamantly denies that he has been such an awful parent to Connor, and their disagreement over this issue is not just about the facts (how many times he showed up, for example), but about differing conceptions of what “being a good parent” means, conceptions that differ, I think in part, due to socialized gender differences. I found Sam’s attitude towards parenting a kid he didn’t want with a woman he doesn’t know or like pretty realistic, actually, and here’s where the constraints of the genre butt up against real life. The genre requires us to root for Sam, to like him and to want him to be happy. But most men in Sam’s situation would do just as Sam did. Probably less.

I also think it helped that Autumn is no great prize herself. She has a bit of a martyr complex, and her romantic life has essentially been on hold since she gave birth. Autumn, an attractive, young, successful woman (and let’s pause for a minute to consider the 100% success rate of heroines in small business! Even in a recession!), could have put herself out there and found a wonderful father for Connor if she had set that as a goal. So there is a bit of a tension in Autumn’s claim that she is over Sam and her actual behavior. Either she was spinning her wheels waiting for Sam to grow up, or she wasn’t, but the book kind of wants it both ways.

Add my susceptibility to dumb macho jock romance to my love for the second chance romance, and I couldn’t help but enjoy this one. Add one of my favorite mini-tropes: the hero shows up, uninvited, in the rain, because he cannot stay away, and I’m a goner.

There’s a line between “an immature man with old scars hiding from his love until he can handle it”, and “a tool who forgets her to have fun for 5 years, coming back when it’s convenient.” Where you think Sam falls will determine whether this book is an enjoyable read or a wallbanger.

23 responses so far

Monday Stepback: Links, links, links

May 02 2011 Published by under Monday Morning Stepback

The weekly links, opinion, and personal updates post

Links of Interest:

Big day. The Osama bin Laden obituary in the Guardian ends:

Bin Laden’s ideology had been a response to the failure of many previous utopic projects in the Islamic world. It had held a brief attraction for some, not least because of the actions taken in a bid to counter it. But most Muslims always knew something essential was missing: the notion of Allah al-rahman w’al-rakhim – God the merciful and beneficent. Bin Laden once claimed: “It is our duty to bring light to the world.” Yet behind his rhetoric of righteousness, divine justice and retribution, there was nothing but darkness.

*****

From Feministe, a reflective post by Jill, Filling the Gaps, on the growing pains of the feminist blogosphere:

I’m as guilty as anyone else when it comes to partaking in feminist Call-Out Culture. Calling Out, I think, is part of any activist’s growing pains. We all want to do right. We all feel like we’re doing more right than some other people who we perceive as having more power (or influence or airtime) than we have. We all want to be a good _____: feminist, ally, woman, activist. Part of that, if you love an idea (and I think most of us do love the idea of feminism, even if we don’t always love how it plays out in real life), is saying something when you see someone else Doing It Wrong. There should be space for that. We should keep each other in check; we should all want to be better.

But in the feminist blogosphere, “calling out” has increasingly turned into cannibalism. It’s increasingly turned into a stand-in for actual activism. We have increasingly focused on shutting down voices rather than raising each other up. Pointing at the gap has replaced doing the hard, often thankless work of filling it.

*****

From the Geeky Blogger’s Book Blog, a May Read it then Pass It Program. Felicia is giving away used copies of Ward, Harris, Moning and others.

*****

Rebecca at Dirty Sexy Books has a terrific post on how avid readers can stay at a healthy weight.

In a way, this post is anti-reading, and it kind of pains me to write it.  On the other hand, I think I was sitting still way too much, and I needed to find a way to make reading fit into my life without making my ass bigger.

I am not trying to steal her thunder, but I went through exactly her process of gaining weight as I started to read and blog, and I even read the exact two health articles to which she links (go read them!). Well worth a read, but then walk around the block — or at least roll your shoulders and point your toes — when you’re finished.

*****

I don’t usually link to the bioethics blogs, but here is post that academics who read this blog may find interesting: From Twitter to Tenure: Using Social Media to Enhance Your Career. They have a schedule of posts on this topic, ramping up to a presentation in Phoenix.

*****

Videos:

1. Amusing video, Pride and Prejudice in Two Minutes, via Jane Austen Today.

2. Alan Rickman reads Sonnet 130. Need I say more?

*****

I like defending romance against broad brush dismissals, but then I sometimes turn around and do the same thing to YA, as when I wonder, “Why do adults read that?”. I never would have made this connection if it weren’t for Keishon’s excellent post at Yet Another Crime Fiction Blog.

*****

Empowerment Fantasies and the Superhero Movie, an interestingly degendered and decraced (unless I missed the parade of female and nonwhite superhero movies) take from Thought Catalog:

It’s worth asking why people so desperately feel the need to watch superpeople beat up other superpeople right now. I know the first wave of recent superhero films came about following 9/11 at the start of the Iraq War, and yes, we still have the wars in Afghanistan and Libya and all the other places exploding, but I would suggest that this surge in superhero films isn’t due to just war or a recession, but a collective feeling of impotence.

*****

I just discovered, and love, Pop Dust. If you like (or even hate to like) pop music, it’s a fun site. I especially like Singles Bar, interesting reviews of new songs.

*****

At Self Publishing Review, a balanced take on the DRM and piracy wars,

On both sides some surprisingly naive notions reign -
- That we can stop people downloading, just like we can ‘win’ the ‘war on drugs’
- That people will pay for something they can get easily for nothing
- That writers can make their money from live performances and give their work away free
- That you can guilt-trip a young person into giving up their cash to show-biz multinationals
- That free ebooks will promote the paper versions
- That there is some tangible, measurable, marketable or moral difference between a digital original and its copy

… and a reply from Teleread:

And I have trouble figuring out how “maintaining DRM” will “make the alternative less palatable, a hassle for all but the geeks.” You don’t have to be much of a geek to type “twilight epub torrent” into Google.

Personal

I turn 42 tomorrow. These monkeys keep me feeling young, though. No big plans, although I see Dooney & Bourke in my future as Mom has insisted on taking me shopping for a new purse. Every purse I have ever owned has come from my mother or mother-in-law. What is it with women of that generation and their purses?

As for the blog … the academic year has ended and I’ve got motive, means and opportunity. Watch out.

HAPPY WEEK!

18 responses so far

« Newer posts

Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: