Midsummer Magic is my first Coulter, but a lot of folks got their romance genre start reading her historical romances of the 1980s. She’s published over seventy titles, beginning in 1980 and continuing to this day. Her last 15 or so books have been FBI paranormal romance thrillers. I happened to spy Midsummer Magic at my local library book sale last weekend, recognized the author’s name, and, well, who can resist this cover?
Published at the end of 1987, Midsummer Magic is the first in the Magic Trilogy. I found this to be an entertaining read, but I was never really invested in the characters or their romance. I found a lot of the action quite silly (the heroine dislocates her shoulder, but manages to have a conversation and bandage a horse’s leg before noticing), and the writing not to my taste (head hopping, for example, with sometimes as many as three points of view in one paragraph. Lots of repetition of dialogue. Etc.).
Phillip Hawsbury, Earl of Rothermere, age 26, promises his dying father, the Marquess, that he’ll go to Scotland and pick a wife from among the three daughters of Alexander Kilbracken, Earl of Ruthven, who saved the Marquess’ life 17 years prior. Hawk (Please. Did you really think he’d go by “Phillip“?) has recently retired from the Army, and would much rather continue enjoying the delights of London, especially those of his mistress, the Frenchwoman Amalie (who calls him “mon faucon“, naturellement). But since his elder brother Nevil’s untimely death, Hawk is the heir, and must do his father’s bidding.
Hawk is good looking and not very bright. His favorite word is “damn” in all its permutations, but especially adjectival. He’s a “damned son”, who made his father a “damnable oath.” “Damn Nevil” for dying! He doesn’t want a “damned wife”, but honor is a “damnable thing”. He doesn’t like “damned weak women” or his “damn miserable situation”, which he “doesn’t damn believe.” Well, that’s three pages. You get my drift.
Something odd happens when information enters Hawk’s brain. It’s like a backwards engineered sausage factory. Here’s an example. When Frances’s pretty sister flirts with him — merely by suggesting she might want to waltz one day — he thinks, “She was so eager. Lord, he would feel like a rapist taking her to wive.”
Among the Kilbracken sisters is Frances, described by her father as “Willful, too independent, a mouth that won’t be silenced, and a damned excellent animal healer.” (Yeah, that last one threw me, too. But the animal thing comes in handy later.) In case her status as spunky heroine is not yet clear, there’s this bit of descriptive prose which telegraphs her personality: “her thick untamed hair … tumbled down in a profusion of wild curls… the color of autumn in the highlands, an uncivilized blending of blond, red, and brown.”
Frances loves frolicking among the lochs and the heather. She does not want to leave home. We know things are tense for this Scottish lass when “The haggis suddenly seemed the most unappetizing concoction in the world.” In order to deter Hawk, she puts on drab clothes, an ugly cap, spectacles, and colonizes her hair into a tight bun. She walks around with a book and stays quiet. Little does she know that Hawk just wants a deferential wife so he can run back to London and Amalie. He chooses Frances, and they wed, the day after he indulges in a little engagement nookie with some random Glasgow widow. Niiiiiiiice.
The journey to Chandos Chase, Hawk’s digs, is long and tiresome for both Hawk and Frances. Haggis provides a window into their complex, evolving relationship:
Hawk said at last, “I’m rapidly tiring of haggis.”
Frances forked down an extra large bite.
Hawk studied her bent head for a moment, then said, “You’re feeling better now?”
… “Yes,” she said, eyeing her haggis with grave concentration, “I am feeling much better.”
Frances is clearly wary, but eventually Hawk must do his duty and bed her. The reverse sausage factory chugs into production again as Hawk thinks:
How did one make one’s wife ready? He certainly couldn’t caress her like he did his mistresses: it would embarrass her horribly and make matters but worse. He shook his head, wishing now that he’d thought to cover his member with cream to ease his way into her.
Hawk goes and gets the cream, and they have the first of a long series of nonconsensual sexual encounters which make this book a wallbanger for many readers. Midsummer Magic is the first romance novel I have ever read in which the development of the hero and heroine’s relationship can be charted entirely via sex lube:
ACT I: MY KINGDOM FOR A JAR OF CREAM
The hero’s point of view: (p. 136-7)
“This gives me little pleasure Frances. It must be done. Now just lie still!” … She felt the bed give under his weight. Felt his hands clasp her about the waist and pull her under him. “Oh, damn.” Hawk said. He’d forgotten the wretched cream. … He’d just have to make do.
The father’s point of view (Yes. The father.) (p. 140):
The marquess closed his eyes. Why the devil would a husband have to use cream with his own wife?
The heroine’s point of view (p. 148):
He didn’t hurt her, for the cream eased his way.
A few chapters on, treading cream, I mean water … (p. 235):
He hadn’t hurt her, after all. He’d gotten the cream.
Wait. What’s this? (p. 249)
“There won’t be any further need of the cream, either” he continued, his voice deep and certain. … “Would you like to know why we won’t need the cream anymore, Frances?” [Utterly sick of talking about the cream, she tries to leave.] “As I was saying, Frances, we won’t need the blasted cream. Why? I’m sure you want to ask me. [Uh, no, she was just leaving actually, until you slammed and held the door shut.] “Well, my dear, we won’t, because when I finally come into you, you will be quite ready for me — wet warm, and quite wild for me.”
A snag in the plans, literally! (p. 251)
Hawked looked at the fingernail of his left hand. He blinked, suddenly afraid that the nail had been jagged the night before. That was the finger he’d covered with cream and eased into his wife. … “BRING ME THE FILE,” he said. [italics and caps are mine. They so should have been in the original.]
INTERMISSION: TELL ME ABOUT IT, STUD.
Alas, all the cream in the world couldn’t make Frances enjoy getting raped. Who knew? I’m not sure why they didn’t think of this immediately, but it turns out she had to be dressed as a stable boy and forced to watch horse sex! *facepalm*
The mare screamed, and Frances knew*, deep down, that it was a cry of pleasure. She felt her palms grow sweaty, her breath grow jerky. … She felt a deep stirring, but she didn’t understand it. She felt a tension building in her belly … no, below her belly, between her legs.
(*Remember her affinity to animals?) Hawk immediately leads her into the tack room, but there is a “damned interruption.”
ACT II: ORGASM
Memories of homoerotic schoolboy days come in handy for our hero! (p. 283)
He suddenly remembered a saying that one of the dons at Eton adored repeating: Great men move slowly. Had the fellow meant in bed?
Two steps forward… (p. 296):
“I wonder if I will have to resort to the cream again?”, he said in a thoughtful voice.
Finally able to joke about the cream. True healing (p. 388):
“I believe we can safely toss that damned jar of cream out the window.”
I haven’t said much about their relationship, because if you are familiar with this sort of book, you already know that she’s a “damned little minx”, whose neck he’d “like to wring”. He’s an absolute jerk. She says a lot of “I hate yous” and “you’re disgustings,” and she’s pretty unformed.
Frances is no brain trust herself, deciding to jettison her disguise and glam it up when Hawk leaves for a tryst with Amalie, to punish him. On Hawk’s return, one sight of his newly lovely bride (although it’s a wonder he never before noticed her “high cheekbones, the beautifully shaped brows, the high smooth forehead”. Bones are kind of hard to hide.) has jars of cream dancing in his head, and she is forced to ask herself:
“Why hadn’t she realized that he would be far more interested in sex with her new appearance.”
Oh, snap! But just ponder that locution for a minute.
Still, I liked Frances a lot more than Hawk. She’s not as considerate of his obvious cognitive disabilities as she might be (she tricks him into mistaking a bolster pillow for his wife. TWICE!), but at least she does something: she decides to get the neglected stud farm in order, and in the meantime discovers a subplot involving horse stealing and fraud which I won’t go into here.
My favorite character is probably Amalie, Hawk’s mistress. She’s not only the one person who calls it like it is:
Listen, mon faucon, how can you be so stupid?
… but she actually solves the subplot mystery, and then shows up at the climax and tackles the gun totin’ bad guy, saving the day!
Amalie and Frances bond over Hawk’s idiocy. Their bonding involves having Amalie hold his arm behind his back while Frances punches him in the stomach. If only the next scene had them making eyes at each other and strolling out of the drawing room, hand in hand, but it was not to be. Instead, there is a dreaded baby epilogue. Are you surprised?

It’s like a backwards engineered sausage factory.
ROFLMAO ROFLAMO DAMNED ROFLMAO!!!
Epic. No more and no less.
TELL ME ABOUT IT, STUD.
Personally, I think we should all treasure the book (and the cream) that inspired this review. Thank you so much!
And the mistress was neither stupid nor evil? That seems so evolved and unlike, well, everything else you’ve described. I’m guessing that unfortunately, it’s the other sisters who get their own books, rather than the delightful Amalie? A damned disappointment for sure.
Can’t. Breath!
OK, better now. Love your way with words.
He can’t be all freaky with his wife like he was with his mistresses, but it’s perfectly okay for him to use some sort of sex cream with her? Oil of Olay. Ye Olde KY? O.o
The Nice Mistress is one of the best features of the otherwise very wacky world of Coulter.
Great review!
Oh, that cream!
Knew you’d like it. *snort*
I love Catherine Coulter and count this book as one of my favorites. It’s of its time, and most of Coulter’s 80s and 90s historicals are full of her personal quirks (the cream and horrible consummations), but the farcical situations and characters have always made me laugh my head off.
@Meri: Actually, it’s a trilogy linked by secondary characters, not Frances’s sisters. I have a particular fondness for the third book, Moonspun Magic, because of a scene involving baking and male anatomy. LOL!
@Evangeline Holland: I can absolutely see that. One thing about these books is they are fun and (intentionally I think?) kind of goofy. I am sure Coulter takes her writing deadly seriously, but within this book there is a spirit of humor I find lacking in many historicals today.
This review is life-changing. I have learned so much about myself. First, I spend a lot to maintain an “uncivilized” hair color (not sure it’s red enough to qualify for Highlands in autumn, but I do blend red and blonde into my brown). And here I used to feel sophisticated after getting my hair done. I must have my own backwards sausage factory. Second, there was a time in my life, before I began reading a lot of romance, when Coulter was my guilty pleasure reading. I didn’t object to or even particularly register the more problematic aspects of the consummation scenes (though I never read this one). I’ve been forced to meditate on what that says about me and my attitudes to sex at the time.
Also, I love that your review is funny and honest but not merely snarky. Because I often do enjoy books very much even while part of me is laughing at them and/or horrified by them. You captured that well.
@Jessica: I so agree. When I look at the historicals I’ve loved, which were originally published in the mid-80s to mid-90s, a lot of them are full of fun and insouciance, and were historically accurate. It seems the pendulum has swung to extremes: historicals are either dark and accurate or frothy and wallpaper, which is why I struggled with accepting my penchant for humor and farce in my own writing for a very long time.
Do you plan to finish the Magic trilogy? If you’re looking for a historical I find incredibly hilarious, you should try Jude Deveraux’s The Raider or Betina Krahn’s The Princess and the Barbarian.
Hey, I love this relationship traced in cream use, and even the father has some say! ROTFL
I’ve never read Coulter, but this was sure delightful. That mistress sounds awesome. I can’t imagine how they wound up with her holding the hero for the heroine to punch, but how fun.
@Evangeline Holland:
I did review the Radier, here. That book even has matching figurines.
I will try the Krahn, too.
Hilarious review! I haven’t read this one but I’m a big fan of Coulter and couldn’t get enough of her in the 90s. The heroes are often total dufuses but that’s part of the charm. Like an arrogant Presents tycoon, he needs to be hit over the head to learn something. She does a lot of cross-dressing heroines (my favorite) and the use of cream is not uncommon, ha.
Love it! You were firing on all cylinders with this one.
But I was hoping for some explanation of the cover. Is there a swan in the book, or is that just to fill the obligatory 80s background-animal quota? And what’s with that statue in the distant gazebo? Inquiring minds want to know.
@Cecilia Grant: No idea! Replace the swan with a jar of cream on a night stand and the gazebo with two horses going at it, and that would have been the perfect cover! If only I had photoshop…
This was THE funniest review I’ve ever read. I can’t even pick my fav line.
@Cecilia Grant:
Swans have a long association with love and relationships because they often mate for life. According to one list I found they can also symbolise:
Love
Grace
Union
Purity
Beauty
Dreams
Balance
Elegance
Partnership
Transformation
Re the old statue – it looks Roman so we could have ‘a love for all the ages’
I can’t read books like this now so have great admiration for this amusing review but also how you can read the craziness – see it for what is and help us laugh but at the same time be respectful of the author and the times in which the book was written. It is interesting how ‘tone’ is so important to achieving this.
Bizarrely enough, none of the creams and other farcical stuff made me even raise an eyebrow, but the phrase “dons of Eton” did.
I have, for research, read probably all the books on Eton on Google books. And don’t think I ever came across the term “dons.” Masters, yet, but not dons.
@Sherry Thomas: Ouch. That would have jerked me out as well. Surprising from someone with training in British history. Maybe she was misled by the fact that has College in its name, as does Winchester?
Slighty OT: Have you ever read Revolution of the Dons, by Sheldon Rothblatt? An oldie but goodie on Oxbridge and society in the 19th C.
@Sunita: Have not read Revolution of the Dons–will add it to the list of research books to consult. (I really should read it, since I love to write about people who are scientist/engineers/scholars of some kind and they presumably would know a great number of people in the academic community.)
half of me is thinking, but i LOVED catherine coulter when i discovered her books when i was in 7th grade! they were so fun to read as an 11 year old!
and the other half is thinking, why do i remember these with such fondness? and how did they not scar me for life about sex?
i tried to read one of my favorite old Catherine Coulter’s last month, but it on sale as a ebook to read on my iPhone during my long metro commute…Evening Star…her mom teachers her a lesson about how horrible men are by sending her to live in an Italian brothe and watch people have sex through two way mirrors and be sold at a virgin auction and…well i could go on. the framework of the story i found so titillating as an 11year old was still fun, but the prose, writing style and repetative was AWFUL.
um, i still kinda like her though. for the nostalgia.