*This review is for adult readers only*
Passion (published in 2006) is a touching love story between a penis and a vagina, with a secondary romance between Mark Hawkmore, the Earl of Langley, architect and hater of class distinctions, and Passion Elizabeth Dare, quiet country widow with a big … well, I’ll let Larry David explain it. Penis and Vagina are being led around the Crystal Palace in 1851 by Mark and Passion, when they meet behind a facade of a medieval castle in the Gothic furniture room. Penis, at 10.5 inches in length, has had woman trouble all his life. Oh, sure, he still holds the record for being the largest of his genital kind at Oxford, where he also graduated with distinction in Production of Ejaculate, but since then, he has had a devil of a time, er, fitting in. As he puts it, “though [women] all claimed to worship his penis, none had opened their bodies to it.” When Penis first spies Vagina, he weeps, knowing he has at last found The One.
As luck would have it, Vagina’s problem is the exact inverse of Penis’s: she has always felt empty and quite literally unfulfilled, her name the cruelest irony of her life. Hungry, ravenous, and sick unto death of men saying sex with her is like throwing a hot dog down a hallway, (ok, I’m kidding about that last one), Vagina began her quest for nonemptiness with her sister’s fingers, eventually graduating to cucumbers, but nothing worked. She wept when she saw Penis for the first time, knowing that finally, she had found her purpose in life.
By the time we get lines like “I don’t want to feel anything but cunt” and “If I could offer my whole body as a sheath for your cock I would do it”, we know that Mark and Passion serve mainly as genital transport systems. While Mark and Passion do very little in this book, Penis and Vagina are supremely gymnastical throughout. Penis swells, stirs, lifts, strains, pulses, jerks, thrusts, thumps, throbs, pumps, pummels, erupts, and, when complimented, nods in agreement. Like any superhero worth his semen, Penis has a couple of sidekicks, known colloquially in the text as “Cods”, who don’t do much but hang around. Vagina is, typical for a female, slightly more complex a character than Penis, as her sidekick, Clitoris is always popping out to do things like “throb in acknowledgment, as if to say, yes, isn’t it magnificent!” (poor Clitoris never went to punctuation school. Too busy pulsing, swelling and burning to concentrate, I guess). Lines like, “I think my cock is in love with you” and “Christ! His prick was so big; it looked frightening even to him.” confirm that Mark, at least, is well aware of his secondary status in this story.
It’s a very explicit, erotic book, which is fine, but the weight placed on the sex act is all out of proportion to the relationship, especially in the early stages. I know other readers found the development of Mark and Passion’s relationship compelling, but I found too much of the work being done via shortcuts, as in, “Though a stranger, he was somehow a part of her”, and “Was she as false as most women? No she didn’t seem anything like most women.” Other telltale signs of unpersuasive writing, such as overuse of the word “amazing”, abound (“amazingly handsome”, “amazing breasts”, etc). There is a cardboard baddie in the form of Mark’s mother, who says things like “You’re my son’s latest fuck” and tries to force him to marry some random woman for her own gain. If you ever saw an episode of Dynasty or Falcon Crest, you have a sense of how deft the plotting and subtle the characterization is. At any rate, I kept picturing Mark’s mother with a deep tan and shoulder pads and Passion with feathered hair.
The most interesting aspect of this book, to me, is how phallocentric it is. Mark’s goal in life is to “get my whole prick, once and for all, into a woman” (everything about this guy screams “adolescent”) and when he finally does, the imagery is militaristic, violent, and very unpleasant. His “invading prick … sent three body-jolting attacks against her womb”, and “He battered the door to her womb with unrelenting ferocity”. This sort of thing goes on and on until Mark rearranges Passion’s internal organs. Rather than screaming in pain, she loves it. While the author claimed to have done “research“, and while I am aware that the uterus and cervix can ascend, lengthening the vaginal canal during arousal, I seriously doubt penile penetration of the uterus is possible or pleasurable (and yes, I know Masters and Johnson reported something about a “vaginal tent”, but that was a long time ago. You know how they “measured” it? External palpation, which sex researchers today think was not a very reliable method to find out how big an internal organ is. In fact, they were probably feeling the full bladders of their research subjects. Today, researchers use noninvasive imaging techniques and find no such tenting, or at least not much that enlarges the vagina beyond the usual size.). But the more interesting question to me is why this violent, painful, protracted, dislocating episode is a fantasy to the writer or to readers. Some things I will never understand.
The sequel, Patience, about Mark’s brother and Passion’s sister, was published earlier this year. I believe it does for the esophagus what Passion did for the uterus, but as I have no plans to read it, I will never know for sure.
Related posts:
- Review: Seduce Me At Sunrise, Lisa Kleypas Cover Comment: Luscious, and the models in the stepback are perfect Series?: Yes. This is the second of the Hathaway...
- Review: Immortal Warrior, Lisa Hendrix Cover Comment: Ok, this males only thing is no longer a trend. It’s a takeover. Series?: Yes. This is Book...
- Review: Beyond the Highland Mist, Karen Marie Moning* *Note: this post contains material not suitable for minors. Also, avoid if you are snark averse. *Complete with super fun...
- Review: Caine’s Reckoning, by Sarah McCarty My Take in Brief: Good. Really well and economically written. Intense, almost claustrophobic focus on sexual relationship. Raised some questions...
- Review: Can’t Stand the Heat, by Louisa Edwards Can’t Stand the Heat, a contemporary romance set in New York, is Louisa Edwards’ debut novel. Adam Temple is a...
- Review: Someone Like Her, by Janice Kay Johnson This is my first review for my first challenge: Avidbookreader’s TBR Challenge, and already I am one day late. Sorry...




#1 by Carolyn Crane on July 6, 2010 - 10:34 pm
Oh, oh, LMAO. Okay, I am so loving that you reviewed this book. The things I have heard about it! I feel fulfilled now. Quite a party under the pants here! I love to see active secondary characters, the cods, the genital transport systems (LOL. Very funny).
#2 by SonomaLass on July 6, 2010 - 11:12 pm
I completely agree. This book made me go “ow” a lot.
#3 by Angela/Lazaraspaste on July 6, 2010 - 11:44 pm
-falls over laughing- Can’t . . . comment . . . dying of . . . laughter.
#4 by Wanderer on July 7, 2010 - 12:44 am
Lmao! Love the review
I haven’t read the book and probably never will. But I do hope you read book 2 so I can read another funny review.
#5 by Holly on July 7, 2010 - 12:48 am
I knew this was going to be an excellent review when it started with:
There’s just nothing sweeter than a penis/vagina love story. I don’t care who you are.
#6 by Meri on July 7, 2010 - 5:26 am
That was the best review I’ve read in ages – Jessica, you are a treasure!
#7 by Kati on July 7, 2010 - 7:37 am
*lights cigarette*
Ahhhh, it was good for me. Was it good for you?
This was just the perfect way to start my morning. Thank you, Jessica!
#8 by Jill Sorenson on July 7, 2010 - 9:56 am
Oh, Passion! What a classic, beautiful love story. My &*$% is weeping, just thinking about it.
#9 by katiebabs on July 7, 2010 - 11:24 am
Passion is the perfect example of the power of the light saber and the magic hoo haa it impales.
#10 by Vanessa Jaye on July 7, 2010 - 11:53 am
lmao! This review is rife with colossal awesomeness.
I love this book, btw. Loved it when I first read it at the time of release (heh) and liked it even more when I re-read it earlier this year. All the critisms levelled at it can’t be (totally) refuted, but for all that, somehow the author just hits a level of sheer intensity between the H/h that’s missing in a lot of current reads.
#11 by Lynn Spencer on July 7, 2010 - 1:37 pm
Lol! Love the h/h as “genital transport systems”.
#12 by Delinda on July 7, 2010 - 1:58 pm
I thoroughly enjoyed your review. As a writer of erotic romance I hate it when something that is nothing more than a sexfest, a hardcore sexfest at that, is bundled up and packaged as erotic romance.
However as a reader, and one who can’t stop looking at train wrecks, I may have to buy this book just to “oh, so that’s what she meant” while reading.
#13 by KMont on July 7, 2010 - 2:05 pm
OK, where’s my RRR alter/sacrificial center? I think it got lost under this week’s laundry – SO sorry! THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN.
#14 by Wendy on July 7, 2010 - 3:25 pm
Oh man. I see lots of spam in your future. Lots and lots of spam……
I read this back when it was first published. I suspect a large reason why I *liked* it (didn’t lurve it) was for the Dynasty/Falcon Crest comparison you made. I’ll admit that trashy primetime soap operas are my crack. Melrose Place, Dallas, Falcon Crest etc. They just don’t make ‘em like that anymore…..
#15 by RfP on July 7, 2010 - 8:10 pm
Yes, the Kama Sutra covers similar territory with more humor. I’d rather read about a rabbit/bull/horse attempting to mate with a dove/mare/elephant.
#16 by Kaetrin on July 7, 2010 - 8:23 pm
Ouch – rearranging the internal organs? Penetration of the uterus? I haven’t read it and I don’t think I’d like it but I have to admit that I do feel a kind of sad fascination with the idea of reading it – I suspect I’d be o-O most of the time though!
Thanks for the AMAZING review Jessica!
Did you enjoy your cruise?
#17 by KristieJ on July 7, 2010 - 9:23 pm
A hellofa funny review! And now that you mention it – it does have a very “Dynasty” type feel to it doesn’t it? I liked it when I read it – a lot for the ‘I can’t believe what I just read’ aspect. But like Dynasty, I’ll never make a steady diet of this author. I’ve no desire to read the sequel either.
#18 by Pamelia on July 7, 2010 - 9:54 pm
Yeah. It was two books for me: one was a really squicky icky uncomfortable (literally and figuratively) attempt at erotica (and I did my research and NO: cervix penetration is neither probable nor would it be pleasurable if it happened — go figure); the other book was a kind of satisfyingly intense emotional story that was all kinds of improbable and all kinds of crazy, but did in fact keep me reading (even though I SO did not want to hear ANY MORE about the copious, say rather “megacopious” amounts of fluids gushing forth.) I read Patience too and it was better on the sex front (if you like some light bondage and dominance play) but a little less emotionally intense.
What I like about them most is that they are not the same old trope and they take some risks.
#19 by Jessica on July 8, 2010 - 6:14 am
Well, I am glad this review struck a chord. Glad folks enjoyed it!
@Vanessa Jaye: yes, many read this book, and many loved it. Reviews were mainly in the B range, at AAR and elsewhere. So what was it? I think you are right about the intensity. Everything about the book is intense. It reminded me of a paranormal dressed as a historical. Like the BDB in Victorian England.
@RfP: oh, you are right! Sunita said on Twitter that Valdez appears to lack a sense of irony and it is so true. Everything is so earnest.
@Pamelia: Your point about it being two books is really interesting. The erotic component did recede after the first half. Kind of like the heroine’s cervix.
@Kaetrin: Ok, but don’t blame me if you do read it!
The cruise was a lot of fun! My kids especially loved it. They want to go on another one immediately.
#20 by Tumperkin on July 8, 2010 - 6:45 am
Superb review Jessica! Your best ever. I loved it.
Aren’t you even tempted to read Patience? Maybe it’s because I read Passion a couple of years ago that I’m considering it but all the reports of cellos and leg-humping are making me horribly curious…
#21 by azteclady on July 8, 2010 - 6:31 pm
Oh my good God, this is… all kinds of amazingly amazing
#22 by Julia Rachel Barrett on July 12, 2010 - 11:14 am
ROTFLMAO! You should be on Comedy Central with this one! And…um…owwwwww!
#23 by Lisa Omstead on July 12, 2010 - 6:53 pm
OMG! I just spewed my red wine all over the keyboard. This has got to be the funniest (and most astute) of any review I’ve ever read:)
Thanks for making my day!