Have you looked at a college course syllabus lately? They have “goals” and “objectives”. The goals are the general intentions of the course, while the objectives are the concrete things that students will learn. The objectives are specific ways to meet the goal.
So in an Intro to Philosophy course, a goal might be something abstract, like “students will gain a greater appreciation of the history of Western philosophical thought”, and an objective would be something narrower, and measurable, like “students will be able to describe the difference between rationalism and empiricism”.
There is a lot of advice online about blogging, sometimes an overwhelming amount. It tends to focus on objectives (usually referred to as “strategies”). I find that much of the advice and strategizing is irrelevant to my goals. It helps me to have my goals in mind when I consider whether to spend time reading what someone has written about a strategy.
I know some of you are reading this and thinking “I don’t have ANY goals with regard to blogging. I just do what’s fun and what I feel like.”
I think that as human beings we act for reasons, which are a kind of intention or goal. When most people say “I don’t have a blogging goal”, I interpret that as “I don’t think about goals.” But there is a difference between not thinking about goals and not having a goal.
Blogging is a human activity, and as such, it is purposeful. The only things we “do” that aren’t purposeful are things like breathing and blinking. So when someone says “I have no blogging goals”, I interpret that as “My goal is not to get bogged down by blogging and to keep it spontaneous and fun.” People who say they don’t have any goals usually do have them, and if you look closely, they also have strategies they use to meet them. For example, the person who says “I have no blogging goals” usually won’t read a post like this when it shows up in her reader. Not reading posts about blogging goals is an objective which serves to meet your goal of not thinking about your blogging and keeping it spontaneous and fun.
I think part of the issue is the word “goal” and what it connotes in our culture. We think it means conscious, striving, effortful, competitive, “work-related”, maybe monetized. But when I go on vacation, my goal is to relax and not think about anything. That’s a goal, but it’s quite the opposite of effortful and tiring and competitive.
Anyway, it occurred to me as I was reading the agenda for the Book Blogger Convention in New York in May (which looks great and which I would love to attend), that several of the panels did not interest me, because they meet objectives for goals I don’t have as a blogger. For example, the panel on marketing or the panel on the relationship between authors and blogger.
I recall having an email exchange with a fellow blogger and talking about stats. It quickly became apparent that all I cared about was subscribers and comments (number and quality) and all she cared about were number of hits and her placement in search engine rankings. It hit me that we had different goals. Mine was more focused on building community, which means repeat visitors and comments, and hers was more on visibility and reach. To meet my goal, I have to do certain things, and to meet her goal, she has to do different things. Or we might do the same things, but to meet different goals. So she might have a contest to generate interest in her blog and increase her numbers, and I might do a contest for a friend who has written a book, or to thank my readers helping me answer a particular question.
For someone more interested in community, it is more important that those people who are valuable contributors keep coming back. Not losing (good) contributors is the focus. For someone interested in, say, monetizing their blog, it is going to be important to see those numbers grow. This might mean paying more attention to what posts generate a lot of interest and hits. It won’t matter quite as much whether the same people keep coming back, but whether more and more people do. For someone who wants to be acknowledged as an expert in her blogging field, being on top of news is going to be very important. To meet that goal she’ll have the objective of doing timely links posts, and to meet that objective she’ll have to be on line a lot, to gather the news via Twitter, feeds, etc.
And these goals aren’t mutually exclusive. Building a good community is a way of growing in numbers, for example, which is a way to better monetize.
I don’t think about my blogging goals every day or every post. But I find it helpful to take a step back and ask myself about them every so often. Recently, when I changed the blog’s name, I realized that I had goals that the blog could help me meet, goals which are outside of the blog itself. Specifically, I could use this blog as a place to think out loud about issues in philosophy of fiction, a subject none of my real world colleagues work on. This will help with both teaching and research. So one issue I became more conscious of is the difference between goals for the blog, versus goals that the blog can help me achieve. (And they are not always compatible: my posts on philosophy of fiction tend not to generate a lot of discussion!) Now my thinking about “blog goals” encompasses both.
Reflecting on blog goals helps me to shuck interest in things that waste time, it helps with focus, it helps with crafting a clear blog identity, it helps minimize the stressful feeling that I should be doing “more”, and it helps with identifying the difference between blogs I merely enjoy versus blogs I want to learn from and emulate. As blogging goals change — and they do — raising my head out of a particular post and looking at the big picture helps clarify and solidify that change (at least for the moment, since goals will likely change again, and again). I recommend it!





Building a community is definitely more important than obtaining hits. I’m at the point now where I’ve sort of plateaued with stats and commenters, and now I’m brainstorming on which direction I want to go with my website. But I can definitely see the allure of racking up thousands of visits each day over wanting people to return to the website and comment.
So true, just defining goals, even if what you’re doing is about recreation, is important. It’s nice to be reminded of that, because my goals are murky, or in flux, I guess. You know what is really inspiring to me is when I look at other blogs where people have clearly thought things through (my personal fave, in the author realm, being, Jim Hines and it’s probably because he HAS clearly thought through his goals.
Also, your post makes me think that blogs are a little like people in this way. They evolve, they change, they have goals whether they realize it, or define it.
I read this and then sat thinking – I got nothing. No goals. But then, the more I thought about it, the more I realised this perception was because I was thinking about a goal as a target; something concrete to seek to achieve. (And that, I definitely do not have). However, the reason I blog (query: is this properly a goal?) is to have a voice within this community. I merely commented on other bloggers’ blogs for over a year before I started my blog and I started it because I was finding commenting wasn’t enough for me: I was purely reactive, and had no way of starting a conversation.
Given that that in my goal, I don’t feel I need objectives as such. I have my blog; so I have my voice. I don’t need to do anything else to meet my goal.
However, I’ve found thinking about this really helpful. I do periodically hit low points with blogging and thinking about it now, I can generally relate all of those to a feeling that I am not meeting my goal somehow e.g. when a few months ago I posted about feeling overwhelmed and unable to devote time to blogging: i.e. a fear of losing that voice. I don’t know why it makes me feel better to understand that, but it does.
Tumperkin, I think your blog is definitely meeting your goal, even when you are too overwhelmed to work on it!
“(And they are not always compatible: my posts on philosophy of fiction tend not to generate a lot of discussion!)”
Coming out of lurkdom to say I really enjoy your posts on the philosophy of fiction. Why haven’t I commented on any of them? Well, because I tend to spend a couple of days mulling over the post and the comments and mentally composing responses. Unfortunately a couple of days in the real world seem to equal to a couple decades in blogging land time and the window of opportunity to comment is gone by the time I get there. Also I have a very hard time condensing my thoughts down to a few short paragraphs (can you tell?!). Perhaps the rapid moving nature of the internet in general does not lend itself to in-depth, detailed back and forth discussions. Or maybe I don’t think fast enough! Anyway, just popping in to say I love your blog and really enjoy the community of commenters it has attracted as well.
(Oh and your Monday Morning Stepbacks are addictive, following the links is like falling down the rabbit hole, you never know what you will discover.)
Great post, Jessica!
I do think about my goals and objectives fairly regularly, that’s just how I’m built. Goal-directed.
For awhile, I really wanted to grow my traffic. The only way I was getting that done was with lots and lots of posting, like 5-7 posts per week.
That just isn’t sustainable for me. I decided that it’s more important to me to have posts with better content to them, not just something that bumps A/H up in the feed stream.
So now I fret a bit that I don’t post frequently enough; and I’m feeling [foolishly] pressured by myself to write important reviews and losing even more momentum. I’m working on relaxing and just posting *what I think*.