Is there any erotic romance writer who sucks you into a story faster than Megan Hart? I doubt it:

First lines of Dirty:
This is what happened…
I met him at the candy store.
He turned and smiled at me and I was surprised enough to smile back. This was not a children’s candy store, mind you–this was the kind of place you went to buy expensive imported chocolate truffles for your boss’s wife because you felt guilty for having sex with him when you were both at a conference in Milwaukee.

First lines of Broken:
This month, my name is Mary, and apparently, I’m as contrary as the nursery rhyme. First I said I wanted to fuck, but now I’m refusing to come out of the bathroom. What I don’t know is that Joe doesn’t like cock teases, nor does he suffer wasting time. He’s already bought the drinks, made the compliments. If I don’t put out in the next five minutes, he’ll put his coat on and go.
I don’t know this because I only met him three hours ago in a bar downtown. His names seemed as if it were a cosmic joke, but out of all the men I met tonight, Joe’s the only one who bothered trying to have a conversation with me. That’s why I picked him. That, and the fact that he’s hot and well-dressed, with a charming quirk of a smile that tries to look sincere but mostly doesn’t.

First lines of Tempted:
Light and shadow painted him. On little cat feet, like the fog, I crept toward the bed. Tug-tugging. I slid the covers off to reveal his body.
I liked to watch him sleep, despite the way it sometimes made me want to pinch myself to prove I wasn’t dreaming. That this was my husband, my house, my life. Our perfect life. That there were good things to be had in the world and I had them.

First lines of Stranger
I was looking for a stranger.
The Fishtank wasn’t my usual hangout, though I’d been inside it once or twice. Recently redecorated, it sought to compete with a bunch of brand new bars and restaurants that had opened in downtown Harrisburg, but though the tropical theme and aquariums were pretty and the drinks cheap enough, the Fishtank was too far away from restaurant row to really compete. What it did have that the other, newer, bars didn’t, was the attached hotel. The fishtank, ‘where you hook ‘em,’ was a sort of joke with the young and single crowd of central Pennsylvania. Or at least with me, and I was young. And blessedly, purposefully, single.
First lines of Deeper:
Now.
The sea remained the same. The sound and the smell of it wasn’t different, nor the push and pull of its waves. Twenty years ago, Bess Walsh had stood on this beach and looked forward to the rest of her life, and now …
Now she wasn’t sure she was ready for what lay ahead.

Opening lines of Pleasure and Purpose: (the one I am reading now which prompted this post)
Stillness Fontaine had never been assigned to a house so modest it didn’t have a name. What sort of man was Edward Delaw, to hold such a high position within the Court of Firth and yet abide in a house as humble as this?
I feel like a real poser when I try to do literary criticism, so this may be way off, but in each of these novels (actually, the last is a novella, the first of three), so many intriguing things are communicated in just a few lines or a couple of paragraphs. In every case, there’s just plain old plot hookage: you want to know more, what is going to happen next.
But you also get important clues about character and conflict.
Like in Dirty, we get a sense of Elle’s personality, her expensive tastes, her cynicism. In Broken, we learn something important about Joe in the way Mary describes his smile. As for Tempted, we know that people never say “my life is perfect” unless it isn’t, and we want to know more about the disconnect between the Anne’s words and feelings. The first line of Stranger is great — connecting it to the title, and hooking you (it’s absurd, on the surface, to be “looking for a stranger”), but the last line of the excerpt tells us something about Grace that’s similar to Anne: she protests too much. Deeper’s hook is very straightforward: just the word “now” did it for me. there’s a now? what happened “then”? And why is it significant enough that this woman is on a beach at night thinking about it? As for Pleasure and Purpose, the whole premise is so bizarre (I’m having feminist angst over this one as I read it) to begin with — who is this woman, why is she at this man’s house? — added to the gap between the humble house and the high station of its inhabitant, that you want to know more.
I’m not sure if that’s a skill they teach at a writing workshop, or if its in the writer’s genes, but I have to end this post so I can get back to Pleasure and Purpose, because I’m dangling on the line after just a few pages.
Related posts:
- BDSM, Anah Crow, JD Robb, Jennifer Crusie, Megan Hart Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association Annual Meeting April 2009, New Orleans Again, my (sketchy) notes. Hopefully I did the papers...
- Mad to Miss it, Sad to Skip it: Megan Hart’s Dirty I’ve decided to start a new feature, in which I talk about books that I love. I haven’t just finished...
- Review: Start Me Up, by Victoria Dahl I listened to the audio version, narrated ably by Wanda Fontaine. To my ears, Fontaine has a very natural amateur...
- Vacation — a great way to start blogging. Not. Ok, so starting a blog a few days before I took off on summer vacation was maybe not the best...
- The Duchess Redux: Reviewing for Politics or Pleasure When I posted my review recently of Victoria Janssen’s The Duchess, Her Maid, the Groom, and Their Lover, I thought...
- The Romance Insider, the Reader, the Fan, and the Academic Researcher Or why I don’t accept ARCs, how Romanceland is like rural America, and why fans and academics aren’t so different...




#1 by heidenkind on November 24, 2009 - 11:23 pm
I met him at the candy stoooooooore
vroom vroom vroooom!
#2 by Janine on November 24, 2009 - 11:39 pm
Yeah, she has a great way with openings. Although the one from Deeper didn’t hook me as quickly as it did you. I lurved Pleasure and Purpose, anti-feminist premise and all. I just took it as being part of the setting, and a really intriguing aspect of it, too. You’ll see in the last novella that not all the handmaidens are like Stillness.
#3 by Laura Vivanco on November 25, 2009 - 4:48 am
None of those openings “hook” me. Quite the opposite. But given that I probably wouldn’t enjoy reading the novels, that’s no doubt for the best. It’s no reflection on the quality of the writing, just that I don’t want to know TMI about people I know in real life, and because the people in fiction can feel very real to me, I prefer not to have to read what feels like TMI about theirs, either. So details about someone’s sex life, told to me in the first person, as though they’re speaking directly to me, really, really don’t “hook” me.
Really? I probably wouldn’t say it aloud, because I would have a superstitious feeling that that was probably tempting fate, but doesn’t anyone occasionally feel that “all is for the best in the best of all possible worlds”? [That can still be a somewhat cynical thought, depending on one's assessment of the limitations on what's "possible."] If I heard someone saying that their life was perfect I might wonder if they were having one of those flashes of joy that can make one feel (albeit temporarily) that “all’s right with the world.” Of course things aren’t perfect, but just sometimes one can have a sense that, in one’s own small sphere, they are, even if only very temporarily.
#4 by Jessica on November 25, 2009 - 7:06 am
@heidenkind: LOL!
@Janine: I hate the premise, but your review convinced me to buy it. so far so good.
@Laura Vivanco: I did add “erotic romance” in the first line of the post, anticipating that for someone who doesn’t read it, they may not work (they may not work for someone who does read erotic romance, of course, too)
As for the “perfect” thing, I agree with you, but I think context is key. I know this is a menage book, and it is an erotic novel with strong romantic themes. So to me, the “perfect” line reads as a foretelling of a problem.
If the same line was uttered at the very end of a traditional romance, the I would believe it.
#5 by Victoria Janssen on November 25, 2009 - 9:22 am
She’s an excellent writer. That’s what it says.
#6 by Carolyn Crane on November 25, 2009 - 10:17 am
Oh, what a great little traipse through these openings! You’re so right, MH is such a good opener–I never really focused on her opening lines, but she gets deep into emotional nuances really fast, and often tends to get the promise of sex in the air, but never in a raunchy way. I haven’t yet read Broken but I love how you point out the way the smile characterizes this fellow. And Mary sees his insincerity, but it’s doesn’t seem to be that that is holding her back. Mmm. To me, MH is a writer in a class of her own.
#7 by Jessica on November 25, 2009 - 11:22 am
@Victoria Janssen: Well put!
@Carolyn Crane: I was totally channeling your magpie ways with this post.
#8 by Tumperkin on November 25, 2009 - 5:18 pm
I also find these openings of the first three very striking and I wonder if it’s partly the first person POV since I don’t find the following two 3rd person POVs so striking.
I keep meaning to think hard about the 1st person / 3rd person thing and post on it – never seem to get round to it.
#9 by Janine on November 25, 2009 - 5:26 pm
@Jessica: I hope you like it. Will you be writing a review?
#10 by Jessica on November 25, 2009 - 9:39 pm
@Tumperkin: You know, I thought the same things as I was writing this post, although I still think she has a way of hooking me with the third person.
I love first person romances. Just love them. Hope you do write on it.
@Janine: I have gotten behind in my Hart reviewing, having read both Deeper and Stranger since starting this blog (I read Tempted and Broken before). I think I will review P&P though. It is such an odd book.
#11 by Janine on November 27, 2009 - 4:15 am
@Jessica Goody! I’m sure you will have interesting things to say about it.