<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New biotechnology and old fashioned conflict: Her Sister&#8217;s Baby by Janice Kay Johnson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/</link>
	<description>Book Reviews, Philosophy, Academic Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>Personally I don&#039;t like this story line. It just seems too weird to be with someone that was married to your sister.  Maybe if more time had passed I could see how something could grow. This seemed to happen way too fast and that brings up the questions you did: Were those feelings there when the sister was alive? If so, eew!

I know a culture where it&#039;s frowned upon for someone to marry into a family someone else in your own family already married into. Hmmm....did that sentence even make sense? Sorry in advance!  Example is a couple who is married, then his brother and her sister end up dating then get married. In more recent years these unwritten rules are a bit more lax but there is still gossip that goes around when something similar occurs. 

The closest I&#039;ve seen that resembles this book&#039;s plot is a woman died and her best friend married her husband. This was an older couple and it was a little scandalous when it happened but I think it was mainly because it was very soon after the wife&#039;s death - I&#039;m talking months. But in the end no one knows what went on between them and it&#039;s their lives so their decisions. The adult kids had some difficulty with it but in the end wanted to see their parents happy.

Enough of my rambling...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I don&#8217;t like this story line. It just seems too weird to be with someone that was married to your sister.  Maybe if more time had passed I could see how something could grow. This seemed to happen way too fast and that brings up the questions you did: Were those feelings there when the sister was alive? If so, eew!</p>
<p>I know a culture where it&#8217;s frowned upon for someone to marry into a family someone else in your own family already married into. Hmmm&#8230;.did that sentence even make sense? Sorry in advance!  Example is a couple who is married, then his brother and her sister end up dating then get married. In more recent years these unwritten rules are a bit more lax but there is still gossip that goes around when something similar occurs. </p>
<p>The closest I&#8217;ve seen that resembles this book&#8217;s plot is a woman died and her best friend married her husband. This was an older couple and it was a little scandalous when it happened but I think it was mainly because it was very soon after the wife&#8217;s death &#8211; I&#8217;m talking months. But in the end no one knows what went on between them and it&#8217;s their lives so their decisions. The adult kids had some difficulty with it but in the end wanted to see their parents happy.</p>
<p>Enough of my rambling&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5345</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5345</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind the sis-in-law, bro-in-law thing--just recently read Kristan Higgins&#039;s FOOLS RUSH IN and enjoyed it very much.

It&#039;s the women&#039;s fiction/romance ratio that concerns me.  I want romance.  I don&#039;t mind massive conflict and/or massive moral issues--where&#039;s the fun otherwise?  But I want my romance centered on the love story.

(Or, if it isn&#039;t completely romance centered, as tends to be the case for Kristan Higgins&#039;s books, it has to be fun.)

Do you think it would work for me given my very narrow and demanding tastes then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the sis-in-law, bro-in-law thing&#8211;just recently read Kristan Higgins&#8217;s FOOLS RUSH IN and enjoyed it very much.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the women&#8217;s fiction/romance ratio that concerns me.  I want romance.  I don&#8217;t mind massive conflict and/or massive moral issues&#8211;where&#8217;s the fun otherwise?  But I want my romance centered on the love story.</p>
<p>(Or, if it isn&#8217;t completely romance centered, as tends to be the case for Kristan Higgins&#8217;s books, it has to be fun.)</p>
<p>Do you think it would work for me given my very narrow and demanding tastes then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Janssen</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5332</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Janssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5332</guid>
		<description>I have a whole pile of JKJ on my TBR, but not this one...so now I have to get it!  The realistic details are one of the things I like most about her books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a whole pile of JKJ on my TBR, but not this one&#8230;so now I have to get it!  The realistic details are one of the things I like most about her books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyl</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5322</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5322</guid>
		<description>Great review, Jessica. This book sounds fascinating. So much so that I just ordered it from Amazon Marketplace. I first discovered JKJ about 4 years ago when her 2005 release &quot;With Child&quot; was the subject of much positive discussion at AAR. I loved that book; it was very emotional. Since then, I&#039;ve tried to catch her new books as they&#039;ve come out. And while none have had the punch &quot;With Child&quot; did, I&#039;ve read several I liked very much. I&#039;d love to see Harlequin target this author as they release digital editions of old titles. I&#039;d buy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review, Jessica. This book sounds fascinating. So much so that I just ordered it from Amazon Marketplace. I first discovered JKJ about 4 years ago when her 2005 release &#8220;With Child&#8221; was the subject of much positive discussion at AAR. I loved that book; it was very emotional. Since then, I&#8217;ve tried to catch her new books as they&#8217;ve come out. And while none have had the punch &#8220;With Child&#8221; did, I&#8217;ve read several I liked very much. I&#8217;d love to see Harlequin target this author as they release digital editions of old titles. I&#8217;d buy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magdalen</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5321</link>
		<dc:creator>Magdalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5321</guid>
		<description>I love that the post with your new puppy is linked as &quot;related.&quot; 

I haven&#039;t read any of JKJ, and this book seems loaded (overloaded?) with issues.  I can relate to the &quot;hmmm&quot; aspect of the rather-quick-to-start-new-relationship-aren&#039;t-we? plot point, as I pretty much ended one marriage in the same nanosecond as I started the new one.  Surrogacy is an interesting wrinkle that, of course, gets ironed out completely in the HEA.

But what most caught my attention is the point about the difficulties that the kids experience.  I&#039;m re-reading some Glenda Sanders&#039; Harlequin Temptations in preparation of a guest blog post at Monkey Bear Reviews, and she too handles some painful home truths in her romances.  I don&#039;t mind a tear or two just before the HEA (in fact I rather enjoy it!), but Sanders had me really hurting almost from the beginning by a plausibly homeless heroine in A Human Touch (1991).

Back to JKJ, though -- a lawyer enjoying a sauna before court?  I don&#039;t know whether to envy the guy, or be disgusted by his arrogance!  I&#039;m usually on the courthouse steps early and anxious to boot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that the post with your new puppy is linked as &#8220;related.&#8221; </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read any of JKJ, and this book seems loaded (overloaded?) with issues.  I can relate to the &#8220;hmmm&#8221; aspect of the rather-quick-to-start-new-relationship-aren&#8217;t-we? plot point, as I pretty much ended one marriage in the same nanosecond as I started the new one.  Surrogacy is an interesting wrinkle that, of course, gets ironed out completely in the HEA.</p>
<p>But what most caught my attention is the point about the difficulties that the kids experience.  I&#8217;m re-reading some Glenda Sanders&#8217; Harlequin Temptations in preparation of a guest blog post at Monkey Bear Reviews, and she too handles some painful home truths in her romances.  I don&#8217;t mind a tear or two just before the HEA (in fact I rather enjoy it!), but Sanders had me really hurting almost from the beginning by a plausibly homeless heroine in A Human Touch (1991).</p>
<p>Back to JKJ, though &#8212; a lawyer enjoying a sauna before court?  I don&#8217;t know whether to envy the guy, or be disgusted by his arrogance!  I&#8217;m usually on the courthouse steps early and anxious to boot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5319</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5319</guid>
		<description>Outside of thanking you for another insightful review full of the moral and ethical intricacies of the novel (to which I&#039;d say - hm - complex but realistic, thinking of someone I know in terms of the transference of attraction after a death - and also probably not a book I&#039;d choose), I have to ask: Is that David Boreanaz on the cover? I have covers on the brain today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outside of thanking you for another insightful review full of the moral and ethical intricacies of the novel (to which I&#8217;d say &#8211; hm &#8211; complex but realistic, thinking of someone I know in terms of the transference of attraction after a death &#8211; and also probably not a book I&#8217;d choose), I have to ask: Is that David Boreanaz on the cover? I have covers on the brain today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heidenkind</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5318</link>
		<dc:creator>heidenkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5318</guid>
		<description>This book sounds well-written.  My first thoughts when mentioned the plot was, &quot;Uck,&quot; and &quot;Awkwardness.&quot;  Fifty cents is a really good deal, though....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book sounds well-written.  My first thoughts when mentioned the plot was, &#8220;Uck,&#8221; and &#8220;Awkwardness.&#8221;  Fifty cents is a really good deal, though&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SonomaLass</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5317</link>
		<dc:creator>SonomaLass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5317</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad I don&#039;t have this book, because I would probably read it and have very complex reactions.  I had the same arrangement planned with my infertile younger sister (full surrogacy, not the rest of it!). She and her husband ended up choosing to remain childless, but this book would give me nightmares about my own brother-in-law (who is an attractive and wonderful man).  *shudder*

I generally love these more complex romances, although I prefer to have scenes where I can see the couple happy, too. I&#039;m cynical enough to need that to believe in happy endings.

I will look for other titles by this author that don&#039;t hit quite so close to the personal for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I don&#8217;t have this book, because I would probably read it and have very complex reactions.  I had the same arrangement planned with my infertile younger sister (full surrogacy, not the rest of it!). She and her husband ended up choosing to remain childless, but this book would give me nightmares about my own brother-in-law (who is an attractive and wonderful man).  *shudder*</p>
<p>I generally love these more complex romances, although I prefer to have scenes where I can see the couple happy, too. I&#8217;m cynical enough to need that to believe in happy endings.</p>
<p>I will look for other titles by this author that don&#8217;t hit quite so close to the personal for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5316</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5316</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just discovered JKJ&#039;s books and your review illustrates beautifully why she generally works for me.  

They&#039;re not &quot;easy&quot; reads.  She doesn&#039;t skimp on the conflict.  And, this can&#039;t be stated firmly enough, she writes the kind of books that are a smack in the face of the stereotypes many readers have of category (OK, Harlequin) romances.  

No, people.  They&#039;re not all fluffy, escapist fantasies about Greek tycoons, virgin secretaries and secret babies.  You can find fulfilling, thought-provoking reads in category format.  Truly.  You just need to put your stereotyping on the shelf, roll up your sleeves, and be willing to look for them.

I was hoping to avoid a JKJ glom - because dang, her backlist is impressive and dang, my TBR is mammoth.  Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just discovered JKJ&#8217;s books and your review illustrates beautifully why she generally works for me.  </p>
<p>They&#8217;re not &#8220;easy&#8221; reads.  She doesn&#8217;t skimp on the conflict.  And, this can&#8217;t be stated firmly enough, she writes the kind of books that are a smack in the face of the stereotypes many readers have of category (OK, Harlequin) romances.  </p>
<p>No, people.  They&#8217;re not all fluffy, escapist fantasies about Greek tycoons, virgin secretaries and secret babies.  You can find fulfilling, thought-provoking reads in category format.  Truly.  You just need to put your stereotyping on the shelf, roll up your sleeves, and be willing to look for them.</p>
<p>I was hoping to avoid a JKJ glom &#8211; because dang, her backlist is impressive and dang, my TBR is mammoth.  Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simone</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/11/08/new-biotechnology-and-old-fashioned-conflict-her-sisters-baby-by-janice-kay-johnson/#comment-5313</link>
		<dc:creator>Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3945#comment-5313</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d read this in a heartbeat. Different strokes, and all.

Sleeping with the wrong brother in the dark, though? Gross!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d read this in a heartbeat. Different strokes, and all.</p>
<p>Sleeping with the wrong brother in the dark, though? Gross!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.readreactreview.com @ 2012-05-17 11:55:21 -->
