<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Stepback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/</link>
	<description>Book Reviews, Philosophy, Academic Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:11:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3606#comment-4442</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know how to define art and don&#039;t really care, but woot, moral repair!

As for Black Silk, it is truly one of the most unconventional romances ever written.  Can&#039;t wait to hear what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know how to define art and don&#8217;t really care, but woot, moral repair!</p>
<p>As for Black Silk, it is truly one of the most unconventional romances ever written.  Can&#8217;t wait to hear what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heidenkind</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>heidenkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3606#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>So did you pay $40 for every one of those computer-generated, not-art romance novels?  Seems a little steep to me.  As for what art is, I don&#039;t agree with Tolstoy.

For me big misunderstandings only work when I&#039;m in on the misunderstanding, too.  I think you&#039;re definitely right about heroes not believing heroines in older books, though--I seem to remember a Victoria Holt book that used that device.  I thought that guy wasn&#039;t worth keeping around....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did you pay $40 for every one of those computer-generated, not-art romance novels?  Seems a little steep to me.  As for what art is, I don&#8217;t agree with Tolstoy.</p>
<p>For me big misunderstandings only work when I&#8217;m in on the misunderstanding, too.  I think you&#8217;re definitely right about heroes not believing heroines in older books, though&#8211;I seem to remember a Victoria Holt book that used that device.  I thought that guy wasn&#8217;t worth keeping around&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie EC</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/#comment-4426</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie EC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3606#comment-4426</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen the &quot;Romances by You&quot; thing.  Occasionally my husband likes to pick up one of my books and read a page of it to me in a &quot;husky&quot; voice to much hilarity.  Sometime I&#039;ll slip in a &quot;Romance by You&quot; and watch his face as he recognizes our uber-embarrassing pet names on the H/H.

Grading ... yeah, I&#039;m getting a huge pile of it tonight.  I feel your pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen the &#8220;Romances by You&#8221; thing.  Occasionally my husband likes to pick up one of my books and read a page of it to me in a &#8220;husky&#8221; voice to much hilarity.  Sometime I&#8217;ll slip in a &#8220;Romance by You&#8221; and watch his face as he recognizes our uber-embarrassing pet names on the H/H.</p>
<p>Grading &#8230; yeah, I&#8217;m getting a huge pile of it tonight.  I feel your pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magdalen</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/#comment-4425</link>
		<dc:creator>Magdalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3606#comment-4425</guid>
		<description>I recently read all of Eva Ibbotson&#039;s books.  One of them, A Company of Swans, made a good point about the Big Misunderstanding -- even as it used a whopping number of them itself.  (I was going to use BM as shorthand, but it just sounds wrong.  Think about it.)

In A Company of Swans, which is set in the period before WWI, the heroine does talk to the hero, although never enough.  But in one conversation, she says she has always had a problem with Romeo &amp; Juliet because why would Romeo believe Juliet was dead when he could have checked by using a chicken feather to see if she was still breathing.  Later on, the hero -- suffering from a bad case of the Big Misunderstanding himself -- spots a chicken, remembers the R&amp;J example, and travels halfway around the world to find the heroine.  (It&#039;s a fun book, and I&#039;m not doing it justice.)

My problem with the Big Misunderstanding as a plot device is that it often comes with a sketchy relationship between the protags.  Karen Higgins&#039; novels seem to suffer from this deficiency.  I&#039;m always left with a HEA that doesn&#039;t seem earned, particularly when the protags didn&#039;t spend very much time together.

In A Company of Swans, the protags spend a lot of time together, and I really believed they loved each other.  Theirs was the other sort of Big Misunderstanding, namely the result of some evil meddling by a &lt;em&gt;deus ex machina&lt;/em&gt; or two.  I&#039;m not wildly excited by that plot device either (I have pretty cynical views on the ability of most people to conspire successfully to ruin other people&#039;s lives) but at least it acquits the protags of intentionally or negligently missing the obvious.

If there&#039;s one thing I can&#039;t stand it&#039;s stupid protags!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently read all of Eva Ibbotson&#8217;s books.  One of them, A Company of Swans, made a good point about the Big Misunderstanding &#8212; even as it used a whopping number of them itself.  (I was going to use BM as shorthand, but it just sounds wrong.  Think about it.)</p>
<p>In A Company of Swans, which is set in the period before WWI, the heroine does talk to the hero, although never enough.  But in one conversation, she says she has always had a problem with Romeo &amp; Juliet because why would Romeo believe Juliet was dead when he could have checked by using a chicken feather to see if she was still breathing.  Later on, the hero &#8212; suffering from a bad case of the Big Misunderstanding himself &#8212; spots a chicken, remembers the R&amp;J example, and travels halfway around the world to find the heroine.  (It&#8217;s a fun book, and I&#8217;m not doing it justice.)</p>
<p>My problem with the Big Misunderstanding as a plot device is that it often comes with a sketchy relationship between the protags.  Karen Higgins&#8217; novels seem to suffer from this deficiency.  I&#8217;m always left with a HEA that doesn&#8217;t seem earned, particularly when the protags didn&#8217;t spend very much time together.</p>
<p>In A Company of Swans, the protags spend a lot of time together, and I really believed they loved each other.  Theirs was the other sort of Big Misunderstanding, namely the result of some evil meddling by a <em>deus ex machina</em> or two.  I&#8217;m not wildly excited by that plot device either (I have pretty cynical views on the ability of most people to conspire successfully to ruin other people&#8217;s lives) but at least it acquits the protags of intentionally or negligently missing the obvious.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s one thing I can&#8217;t stand it&#8217;s stupid protags!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Janssen</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/#comment-4424</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Janssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3606#comment-4424</guid>
		<description>BLACK SILK!  Yes!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BLACK SILK!  Yes!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Crane</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/#comment-4423</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3606#comment-4423</guid>
		<description>LOL. This is wonderful!  I didn&#039;t know about it! I love your names!!

However, on second thought, I think YOU are the scurvy dog!!  

Just like Duchamp&#039;s urinal, this is your work now, and how are we supposed to know you don&#039;t have sincerity in your heart when you made it? Perhaps privately, you think of yourself as uppity, and you dream of being pulled by your bodice strings, and being bedded by Jelly Bones Bud, (a name I am only now really appreciating!) but you don&#039;t want your husband to know, so you have constructed this elaborate ruse, and unbeknownst to us, it&#039;s really a cry of sorrow into the void of blogland for the unlikelihood that you and JBB will ever be united.  

I am weeping! You are a total Tolstoy, dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. This is wonderful!  I didn&#8217;t know about it! I love your names!!</p>
<p>However, on second thought, I think YOU are the scurvy dog!!  </p>
<p>Just like Duchamp&#8217;s urinal, this is your work now, and how are we supposed to know you don&#8217;t have sincerity in your heart when you made it? Perhaps privately, you think of yourself as uppity, and you dream of being pulled by your bodice strings, and being bedded by Jelly Bones Bud, (a name I am only now really appreciating!) but you don&#8217;t want your husband to know, so you have constructed this elaborate ruse, and unbeknownst to us, it&#8217;s really a cry of sorrow into the void of blogland for the unlikelihood that you and JBB will ever be united.  </p>
<p>I am weeping! You are a total Tolstoy, dude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne McA</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/#comment-4422</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne McA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3606#comment-4422</guid>
		<description>She could have sapphire eyes, cobalt blue eyes, eyes of aquamarine, gentian or like bluebells drenched in dew (and for the hero ice-blue, steel-blue - perhaps even electric blue) but no denizen of Romance land is going to admit to eyes that are simply blue. 

(Anyway, she&#039;s a heroine, therefore her eyes are emerald.) 

And the hair - if she&#039;s shy, it can be mousy brown.  Otherwise we can do red, flaxen, or impossibly curly, but never brown. Sable if you must...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She could have sapphire eyes, cobalt blue eyes, eyes of aquamarine, gentian or like bluebells drenched in dew (and for the hero ice-blue, steel-blue &#8211; perhaps even electric blue) but no denizen of Romance land is going to admit to eyes that are simply blue. </p>
<p>(Anyway, she&#8217;s a heroine, therefore her eyes are emerald.) </p>
<p>And the hair &#8211; if she&#8217;s shy, it can be mousy brown.  Otherwise we can do red, flaxen, or impossibly curly, but never brown. Sable if you must&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niveau</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/10/04/monday-mornin-stepback/#comment-4416</link>
		<dc:creator>Niveau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 05:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=3606#comment-4416</guid>
		<description>You raise an interesting point about Big Misunderstandings, but I have to wonder if the older versions are BMs in the first place. To me, the BM is about a lack of communication, or the pairing of an error in communication with a bad assumption. If the hero is simply refusing to believe the heroine despite good communication on her part, the man&#039;s just being an idiot. There&#039;s no misunderstanding because there&#039;s nothing to misunderstand. (Sadly, this still pops up from time to time. &lt;em&gt;Bound by the Marcolini Diamonds&lt;/em&gt;, one of September&#039;s Presents titles, features a hero who refuses to believe the heroine when she tries to tell him she&#039;s innocent of some nasty allegations. When he finally learns the truth, he&#039;s shown thinking that she never tried to defend herself. *sigh* )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise an interesting point about Big Misunderstandings, but I have to wonder if the older versions are BMs in the first place. To me, the BM is about a lack of communication, or the pairing of an error in communication with a bad assumption. If the hero is simply refusing to believe the heroine despite good communication on her part, the man&#8217;s just being an idiot. There&#8217;s no misunderstanding because there&#8217;s nothing to misunderstand. (Sadly, this still pops up from time to time. <em>Bound by the Marcolini Diamonds</em>, one of September&#8217;s Presents titles, features a hero who refuses to believe the heroine when she tries to tell him she&#8217;s innocent of some nasty allegations. When he finally learns the truth, he&#8217;s shown thinking that she never tried to defend herself. *sigh* )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.readreactreview.com @ 2012-02-11 04:19:05 -->
