An unusual Blaze with an exhibitionist heroine and the man who accepts her trenchcoaty ways.
Series?: Yes, first in Bond’s series about women who took a Sex for Beginners course in college. Their professor sends them their secret fantasy class journals 10 years later.
Setting: Tampa, Florida, put to good use by A/C breakdowns and reoccurring peacock character.
Heroine and hero: Gemma is a recent divorcee at loose ends and trying to find herself after being a high profile politician’s wife for years. Chev is a Puerto Rican American contractor who flips houses between jobs. He happens to be on the job next door.
Plot: Gemma’s recovery from the divorce. She gets a job as a scantily clad tour guide for an adults-only sex exhibit at the local museum, allowing her to explore her exhibitionist fantasies, dormant since college.
Conflict: Gemma’s not ready for a new relationship, especially when she still has unfinished business with her ex.
Fun factoid: Ms. Bond bought the shoe store where she worked while a sophomore in college.
Racy Romance Review:
I listened to this on audio, narrated nicely by Drosty Kane. Blazes are about 6 hours and work really well on audio. Sticklers may not be too happy with the light “Hispanic” accent she gives Chev.
This was very much Gemma’s story, with very little from Chev’s point of view. Chev was unformed as a character. Also, while one can usually count on lots of h/h interaction in Blazes, Gemma’s exhibitionism meant their interactions often took place with panes of glass between them.
Gemma has to pick up the pieces of her life, and in the course of the book she comes to realize her marriage was not what it seemed. I was not convinced that Gemma was ready for a new relationship — the ink was barely dry on her sudden divorce. I felt that the HEA was very unbelievable between these two characters who never even went on a date in the course of the book. So much time was spent on Gemma’s recovery and renewal (which was quite interesting and kept me listening) that she had very few interactions with Chev.
Probably the most intriguing part of the book for me was the focus on Gemma’s exhibitionism (or “E” as I will refer to it from here on in). Gemma’s E surfaced in college, when, in some unappealing flashback scenes, she exposed herself and masturbated in public. She married a straight laced lawyer who became the Florida state attorney general, and curbed her wanton ways to play helpmeet for several years.
In a stroke of pure luck for an exhibitionist who needs a job, the local museum wants hot women to dress in platforms, short short, and masks to give tours for a new sex exhibit. Gemma is turned on by her outfit and returns home to masturbate in front of her window for Chev. She begins the book thinking her habit is shameful, and ends by claiming it as a part of who she is. To my utter shock, the HEA includes Chev accepting her E, and her plans to continue it, with other men. How exactly did this get past the censors at Harlequin?
Like Gemma, I had some E in college, at the Boston Public Library, courtesy of a drunk man in a trench coat with a beer belly and a flaccid penis which he excitedly waved at me as if it, rather than the copy of Aquinas’s Summa contra Gentiles I was reading, would reveal the secrets of the universe. It was an experience I never want to repeat in this or any future life.
I did some research on E, and found out that “exhibitionism” is listed in the DSM_IV as a sexual disorder, in the family “paraphilias”, from the Greek meaning “outside of” and “friendship/love”, the idea being they are socially prohibited sexual practices. Other paraphilias listed include masochism, sadism, transvestite fetishism, and pedophilia.
E is only a disorder if it interferes with quality of life and normal functioning. Most people with E are males (the vast majority) and have problems with sexual relations and often other illnesses like depression.
I don’t think Gemma’s E, in the end, qualified as a disorder, as it did not negatively impact her functioning (indeed, she got a job, a promotion, and a lover out of it!). And all of Gemma’s targets seemed to consent, at least tacitly, to her shows of skin (although this raises some interesting questions about consent which I won’t get into here).
And even if Gemma’s behavior did fall under E as defined in the DSM-V we all know that this manual has a long sordid history of providing medical and normative support to harmful societal prejudice (homosexuality, drug use, and women’s health being just three examples). To ask just one question, what counts as “normal functioning” and who decides?
But I confess I found it hard to believe that a man in love would accept his partner’s need to bring other men to arousal as a way to stimulate herself, as Chev appeared to do at the end. It just didn’t work for me.
Related posts:
- Review: Devil’s Bride, by Stephanie Laurens My Take In Brief: Sometimes I love a romance because it is new or different. I loved this one because...
- I Finally Read a Stephanie Meyer. Thoughts on New Moon. Stay away from this post if you like this series, if you dislike snark, or if you don’t want...
- Review: She’s Got It Bad, by Sarah Mayberry Heroine and Hero: Liam, former abused orphan bad boy cum multimillionaire custom organ-donor-on-wheels maker. Zoe, former good girl, now...
- Joint Review: The Madness of Lord Ian Mackenzie, by Jennifer Ashley Tumperkin’s Take: Sometimes, when I’m really enjoying a book, I just race through it. If I get even five...
- Review: Start Me Up, by Victoria Dahl I listened to the audio version, narrated ably by Wanda Fontaine. To my ears, Fontaine has a very natural...
- Review: Ain’t She Sweet, by Susan Elizabeth Phillips My Take in Brief: I loved this book. But I can’t believe it’s an SEP. Setting: Contemporary small town Parrish,...

#1 by JenB on May 31, 2009 - 9:05 pm
I don’t think that would work for me either. Not as a romance, anyway. As erotica, sure, but not erotic romance.
#2 by katiebabs on May 31, 2009 - 9:11 pm
This book seems a bit too heavy for Harlequin, especially a Blaze! It is one thing to enjoy exhibition must masturbate in public and get off thinking people will watch? If that was a guy doing that, he would be hauled off to jail for indecency.
#3 by Kat on May 31, 2009 - 9:20 pm
I haven’t read this book, so I can’t comment specifically on this story, but in general, I think for exhibitionism/voyeurism in romance to work for me, it would have to be done with the h/h together and sharing the experience. If it’s one person getting her thrills and the other staying at home and getting a second-hand account of what went on, I just don’t find that romantic at all.
#4 by Phyl on May 31, 2009 - 9:36 pm
This doesn’t sound very romantic to me either. In the past I haven’t read very many Blazes, but I did just read two that I liked very much. I plan on reading more, but think I’ll skip this one. I guess I should thank you for “taking one for the team.”
Oh, and I really, really like the quilty icons with the comments. I want.
#5 by Laura Vivanco on June 1, 2009 - 4:05 am
“An usual Blaze”
Do you mean “An unusual Blaze”?
#6 by Jessica on June 1, 2009 - 5:16 am
@ Laura Vivanco:
Thanks Laura. Yes, it is an UNusual Blaze. I fixed it!
I think I may have sent the wrong message about the sexual content in this review. While sex is a key theme in this book, given the heroine’s job and the fact that the author is using Gemma’s gradual acceptance of her fetish as a sign of her personal growth, this book doesn’t have more than the usual explicit sex scenes for a Blaze. Actually, the h/h don’t have sex until well past the halfway point, which is quite late for a Blaze.
Actually, I was thinking it would have made a good women’s fiction book.
For me, to work as a romance, it needed to have a sequel when the h/h start dating and getting to know each other. I think falling fast and hard can be written convincingly, but not for these two characters.
Phyl wrote:
I hadn’t thought of them that way. Of course, a quilter would!
#7 by Janine on June 1, 2009 - 6:14 am
Yuck. That happened to me in college too, except the weird guy was under thirty and I was in front of the TV in the student rec center in summertime, when the campus was relatively empty. I’m not sure if he was drunk, but his penis was flaccid!
A fellow college student friend of mine had something even worse happen to her — a guy she sat next to on the bus put his jacket on his lap and started um, pleasuring himself under it.
I wonder how many female college students have these twerp experiences?
#8 by Laura Vivanco on June 1, 2009 - 6:49 am
katiebabs wrote:
It makes me think of this Maltesers advert in which a woman flashes her breasts at a man. I think the audience is supposed to think that this kind of sexual harassment in the workplace is funny, and presumably that’s because it’s directed at a man.
I wonder if the heroine’s exhibitionism is perhaps presented as being OK because (a) she’s female and the people she shows herself to are male and (b) she’s got a body which fits social norms about what’s sexually attractive in a woman. I could be wrong, of course, since I haven’t read the book.
As for the hero’s attitude, it reminds me of a comment made by a lapdancer called Stephanie:
She looks over to the bar, where her fiance is waiting to take her home. How does he feel about her job? “He doesn’t mind, so long as I am going home with good money. It makes him feel good. Other men want what he has got.” (Cooke, Guardian)
It seems not dissimilar to the idea of having a “trophy” wife.
#9 by azteclady on June 1, 2009 - 10:06 am
I don’t think it would particularly work for me because exhibitionism just icks me out (no judgement on people who enjoy it or on voyeourism, just my reaction).
Part of the thing with exhibitionism for me is the consent issue–some people will be okay with it, for others it is a violation of their personal boundaries. It’s completely different when both the people doing and the people watching have consented a priori. Without explicit consent, it bothers me. A lot.
#10 by jillsorenson on June 1, 2009 - 10:55 am
Um. Sounds hot to me!
Does she get off on a strange man’s response, or is the act of exposing herself the real turn-on? A threesome is an exhibition, I think. If erotic romance readers can accept that, why not this?
#11 by Jessica on June 1, 2009 - 1:37 pm
Laura Vivanco:
The hero liked her exhibiting herself for HIM alone. As for doing it for others, he accepted it, but didn’t like it.
I agree that if the gender roles were reversed we would be saying this is one pervy guy. Also, if she were fat or ugly, she wouldn’t get away with it.
jillsorenson wrote:
Actually, the scenes between the h/h were pretty hot. But there was a budding relationship, consent. the scenes where she did it just randomly were not hot to this reader.
I might look at a hot man at the gym, but if he pretended to drop a towel and showed me his bait and tackle (this is what the heroine did) and proceeded to get aroused, I would call the police.
As for what aspect turned this heroine on, I think both the exhibiting of herself and the reaction. Studies I looked at suggest that exhibitionists actually do hope for some kind of positive response, and do not want to instill fear or shock in general.
#12 by willaful on June 1, 2009 - 7:07 pm
I find it quite plausible in a real life relationship. Not sure I would want to read about it in a romance, however.
Am also really turned of by that cover, which for some odd reason keeps looking to me like an Edwardian guy with a handlebar mustache.
#13 by Jessica on June 2, 2009 - 7:15 am
Janine wrote:
I don’t know, but I agree it seems pretty common!
willaful wrote:
I agree, both on the plausibility in RL and the cover, LOL!