Tumperkin’s Take:
Tempt the Devil by Anna Campbell: High Concept Romance
Tempt the Devil is the second book I’ve read by Anna Campbell. The first was her debut, Claiming the Courtesan, which was the subject of some online controversy on account of a forced sex scene between the courtesan heroine and the ex-client hero (a Duke, naturally). I was non-plussed by the forced sex but considerably irritated by the entirely charmless Duke. Tempt the Devil, Campbell’s third novel, again features a courtesan heroine and client hero.
On the plus side, TTD is a more assured piece of writing than CTC and features a much more appealing hero. It might, in fact, be argued that TTD is a more successful execution of the story Campbell has already told in CTC. Less positively, TTD suffers from some of the drawbacks of High Concept Romance.
Like a high concept movie, a high concept romance novel features a strong but simple premise. High concept can work brilliantly, but it sometimes it falls flat on its face, relying as it does on strong ideas and predictable genre conventions at the expense of plotting, characterisation and subtlety.
The heroine of TTD is Olivia Raines, The Most Desirable Courtesan in All London (my capitalisation). Olivia was sold into prostitution by her gambler brother. Her great secret *mild spoiler* is that she is frigid but is very good at pretending to enjoy sex,
The hero is Julian, the Earl of Erith. Married young to a woman he loved madly, he was so grief-stricken when she died that he abandoned his two children and went to travel and become a diplomat. When he returns to England, his children are young adults. We are told that he recognises that he has failed them and wishes to reconcile with them before he returns to his work in Vienna. Of course, he can’t simply spend his time with the children he hasn’t seen since they were toddlers (um – why?). He needs to take a mistress to service his vast sexual appetite. And that woman must be Olivia Raines, The Most Desirable Courtesan in All London.
Julian quickly discovers that Olivia is frigid (despite the fact that no-one else has ever guessed this). Olivia is mortified and wants to bring their association to quick end but Julian persuades her to accept a wager. If he can ‘bring her to pleasure’ she will admit defeat and remain his lover until he returns to Vienna. If he cannot, he will publicly admit she is the only woman who ever got the better of him.
And so we have our high concept: Can the heartbroken rake make the frigid whore come and can the frigid whore make the heartbroken rake love?
There were, throughout the book, a number of enjoyable scenes. In particular, there were a few fairly good Excruciating Moments, to which I am admittedly very partial. However, my major gripe was that it seemed that many of the decisions the author made were driven by the high concept rather than by whether these events were consistent with the characters. This gave the book quite an uneven feel for me.
For example, Erith is incredibly sensitive to and understanding of Olivia’s tragic history – far more than would be expected of a man of his time and class. By contrast, however, beyond a token recognition of his failure as a parent, he appears to have absolutely no sympathy for or understanding of the children he has shamefully neglected for 16 years.
This is Erith’s internal thought-process as he pushes Olivia for details of her past:
Painful compassion paralysed him. How could he put her through this? Her suffering was clear. And she’d already suffered too much.
And this is his internal thought-process when he is out riding with his daughter Roma and pondering his absence from her life:
[Roma had] greeted him with surly dislike when he arrived from Vienna, and her attitude hadn’t warmed since. He’d allowed her to get away with her open resentment since he’d got back because he felt guilty.
He wasn’t letting her go unchallenged any longer.
The generosity that Erith shows to Olivia is noticeably lacking when it comes to his daughter. But then the problems between Erith and his daughter aren’t there to do anything other than serve the high concept. She is an obstacle to their love, a wildcard who turns up at the protaganists’ ‘love-nest’ uninvited to prompt the showdown that serves as the book’s bleakest and most excruciating moment.
I should say that overall, and despite these inconsistencies, I did find the hero quite appealing. The descriptions of him are delicious and he is generally full of humour and warmth.
There were also some really nice scenes. I liked the showdown and thought Campbell did a good job of making characters’ reactions to that credible. And if I felt that the resolution of how they would get their HEA was something of a sop to Cerberus, I was nevertheless moved by the final scene. There was a lovely suspended quality to the final words that left me with a sort of breathlessness. So that was all to the good.
I really can’t leave this book alone though, without mentioning that the sex scenes – which were legion – involved some of the purplest prose I’ve read in a while. There were endless references to stallions, mares, heat, lack of control and sweating. (What is it with sweating during sex in romances? Hmmm, perhaps that’s a post for another day). And when the orgasms finally came, there were the inevitable stars:
Then behind her closed eyes there wasn’t dark at all. The midnight sky exploded with a conflagration of a million stars. A million suns that illuminated a new world.
This new world was beautiful. More beautiful than anything she’d ever seen. For an eternity she hung suspended among those blazing stars. Earth had no meaning. She left mortality behind. Instead she was a being of star fire and passion.
To quote When Harry Met Sally…….
……….. I’ll have what she’s having.
Jessica’s Rejoinder:
I agree with everything Tumperkin has written, and am actually quite vexed that she used the galaxy orgasm passage because I so wanted to. Suffice to say that Ms. Campbell tends to write more modifiers than I like to read. YMMV.
After my disappointment last year with the celibate courtesan heroine of Loretta Chase’s Your Scandalous Ways, I hoped that in Olivia I would find a sexually experienced heroine who was, if not completely happy with her life (that wouldn’t do), at least semi-happy in bed. But no, Olivia is frigid. And Erith, it turns out, is not “ruthless and merciless” as he is so often described. He’s a pretty good guy. So, instead of professional caliber sex between two people who think of themselves in terms of sexual superlatives (as London’s most infamous courtesan, and London’s most infamous rake, respectively) we get, unexpectedly, a metaphorical virgin and a virtuous man who won’t sleep with his mistress until she can enjoy it, too.
Like Tumperkin, I thought the checklist “1. give London’s most famous courtesan an orgasm, and 2. reunite with my abandoned child” showed a value system slightly out of whack. But I liked Erith very much, and I loved the fact that he was so quickly enthralled by Olivia and so desperate to keep her. That kind of obsession — the galloping from London to the English countryside, the spying, the dragging her to the park in a rainstorm and continuing to plead — is so rare in romances. Passion, yes, but out of control obsession? Not so much. And I enjoyed trying to figure out when Erith’s obsession turned from a sexual one into a romantic one. This was compelling enough stuff for me: being told over and over how out of character it was for the callous rake to behave this way was needlessly distracting.
I also liked the honesty that characterized the relationship between Erith and Olivia. For example, at one point he says, “What can I say? I was jealous.” And at another, Olivia, instead of engaging in a long monologue wondering why Erith is sitting so stiffly, says, “Erith, I hate to admit this, but you’re making me nervous.”
Olivia was harder to get a handle on. She was defined almost wholly by her twisted relationships with men. What did Olivia want? What did she do outside the bedroom? Who was she? When we meet her, she’s the infamous courtesan who wears pants and smokes cigars. Later she’s in the countryside, canning. Yes. Canning. Erith very quickly comes to regard her as a wonderful woman. I couldn’t see it.
Tumperkin mentions a “showdown” near the end, with an Excruciating Moment, and I liked that scene a lot, too. Not just that Olivia gave Erith an ultimatum, but his response. It’s not “Ultimatum, Acceptable Alpha Reaction to” from Chapter 3 of the Alpha Heroes Textbook (“How dare you give me an ultimatum. Good day, madam.”), but the more heartbreaking, sexy, and ultimately compelling “Listen to me. Let me help you see it my way. While I make sure your nether regions are clean. With my tongue.” Ah, Last Chance Sex. We know it’s not goodbye, but thank heavens they don’t because it’s compelling, desperate stuff (and in this scene the desperation leaves less room for the Purple). In Regencies, Last Chance Sex is always on a chaise in a drawing room. In contemps, it’s often in a car or a foyer. In paranormals, it’s usually in midair. (Kidding!)
I liked the premise, and I absolutely adored certain scenes, but there were a number of head scratching moments, and I found it hard to press on at some points. Like Tumperkin, my overall reaction is mixed.
I see it came out in January of this year. So, let us know. What did you think?
Related posts:
- Review, Never Romance a Rake, Liz Carlyle Cover comment: I love the covers in this series, but recall that I am pretty time period insensitive. Is there...
- Review: The Darkest Night, by Gena Showalter My Take in Brief: They fight! And bite! They fight and bite and fight! Fight fight fight! Bite bite bite!...
- Review: Wild At Heart, by Patricia Gaffney My Take in Brief: I really enjoyed this one. Amazing how different it is in every way from THATH. She’s...
- Review: Grimspace, Ann Aguirre Cover comment: The heroine’s hair is not what is described in the book, where the unruly mess is almost a...
- Review: Death Angel, Linda Howard Cover Comment: It’s perfect! Setting: Present day USA, both New York City and more rural parts of the US. Series?:...
- Review: Cold Case, Hot Bodies, Jule McBride Cover Comment: Pure Blaze — very good looking models though! Setting: Present day New York city. Series: No, unless you...





#1 by Robin on May 17, 2009 - 7:04 pm
I have been halfway through this book for months now (started it right when I bought it, which was right after it was released). The frigid thing REALLY turned me off, in part because it seemed like a much stronger undermining of Olivia’s character than had been done to what’s-her-face in CtC. It’s one thing to control one’s sexuality consciously (i.e. Claiming the Courtesan) but quite another to be in a sexually-defined profession and be unable to experience any sexual enjoyment. Although one could argue that neither Olivia nor Verity is as powerful as she claims, I find the heroine who can at least experience sexual fulfillment to be *more* empowered than the woman who cannot and must be cured by her True Love and his great and magical penis.
One day I’ll have to finish TTD to see if my view changes.
#2 by MoJo on May 17, 2009 - 7:20 pm
I read a review of this on Mrs. Giggles and thought it was CtC because I couldn’t remember the title of the book (this is common for me unless it’s a standout book).
Considering CtC left me underwhelmed both in regard to the forced seduction (there was one? Really? I must have blinked) and the fact that the hero was more obsessed with the heroine than loved her and never really would love her, I probably wouldn’t read this based on the fact that this author has already used this premise and I don’t trust her to do it right a second time and…why should I?
On the other hand, the second book this author has out (UNTOUCHED) I thought was different and poignant.
#3 by Kaetrin on May 17, 2009 - 8:07 pm
I haven’t read this book – I did read CTC and overall, I thought “meh”. Ultimately, I just didn’t connect with it and (IMO) I just didn’t think it was very good. There are so many books to read, I don’t have time to try again with this author and none of the reviews of read of her other work have led me to change my mind, at least so far.
But, thank you for your description of the hero’s response to her ultimatum – I’d never thought of that particular act as hygiene before! (Plus, it gave my sinuses a clean too as I snorted tea out my nose..!!).
#4 by Kyra on May 18, 2009 - 6:15 am
I feel quite ambiguously towards Anna Campbell. I didn’t think much of CtC, but later felt more positively towards it because, however else you felt about it, at least it wasn’t run of the mill. Untouched was gorgeous and I loved it. And this one … gave me emotional seasickness. God, those two. Up and down, up and down. I like my romances emotional and I like them edgy but this was just exhausting.
Also I think my passionate hatred for the cover might have prejudiced me unduly. Why is that man glaring at me like that? Why does he want to hurt and violate me?
Loved your joint review though. And you’re dead right – Erith has weird priorities. I felt something bothering me when I was reading that’s exactly it. The disjunction between his care for Olivia and his care for his family is genuinely jarring.
#5 by Jill Sorenson on May 18, 2009 - 7:27 am
Everyone raved about Untouched, but I couldn’t get into it. I’m reluctant to try another.
#6 by Victoria Janssen on May 18, 2009 - 10:55 am
I enjoyed it quite a lot, actually. I wasn’t reading it as a realistic situation by any means–I often “wear my romance-colored goggles” when reading certain romances which you identified as High Concept. I wonder if the children were given lower status in the book simply in reaction to the fact that “cute, matchmaking children” often take over the story in romances featuring a widower or widow–in this case, they were made subordinate to their parent’s needs. Not good in real life, but in a romance, which is supposed to focus on the hero/heroine relationship first, it makes sense to me. Also, I think it underlines that the hero isn’t perfect by any means.
For me, the wild emotional surges of the story were what I wanted, and what I got. In media fandom, sometimes that’s called “emotional pr0n.”
UNTOUCHED is my favorite of hers, too. It’s so cracktastic!
#7 by carolyn crane (CJ) on May 18, 2009 - 12:09 pm
Well, I didn’t read this book, but I enjoyed your review, particularly the discussion of the high concept forcing a framework onto the characters that may not have felt natural.
A lot of times they say that if you give a hero or heroine a desire that’s strong enough and put in obstacles, you have a story, it sounds like she did that well, but let it be disconnected to character and world.
Okay, what does it say about me that I actually sort of liked the galactic orgasm passage? I did, I did!
#8 by Jessica on May 18, 2009 - 5:53 pm
Robin wrote:
I agree with you. Olivia really is quite unformed, and it was as difficult for me to imagine how this person could have become London’s most notorious courtesan as it was to imagine the hero as London’s most notorious rake.
MoJo wrote:
Until I read T.’s review and these comments, I had no idea how similar CtC is to TtD. But that’s interesting that you liked the middle book.
Kaetrin wrote:
Well, things were different in Regency London.
But I agree with you on the “will I try this author again” question. I feel so incredibly behind. I started reading late and I read maybe a book a week, that I am reluctant to try an author again unless I really liked her. I may do it for an author everyone raves about, especially if it’s a different subgenre (Victoria Dahl and Gena Showalter are two I plan to read more of, but in a different subgenre than I have preciously tried), but otherwise, life’s too short.
Kyra wrote:
This is very true.
Victoria Janssen wrote:
And then you have this other way of looking at it.
My own reactions were all over the map as I read, and I can see readers very split on this book and CtC. This author clearly has something going on.
carolyn crane (CJ) wrote:
I loved that too. Tumperkin always teaches me something.
carolyn crane (CJ) wrote:
Is this a rhetorical question?
#9 by Robin on May 18, 2009 - 7:12 pm
Untouched must be some kind of Romance Rorschach test. It’s by far my least favorite Campbell book, although I liked the premise (captivity, go figure). But it just felt so awkwardly written and clumsily overwrought. CtC remains my favorite Campbell book, even though I did not like the second half as much as the first.
#10 by Phyl on May 18, 2009 - 10:23 pm
I read this just last week and like you, my reaction was mixed. I have to give credit to Campbell for writing books that are outside the norm. I really liked the excruciating moment scene (can I call it the EM?) because of the way Olivia demanded what she called her “birthright.” But I did feel an awful lot was missing. As you’ve pointed out, there’s such inconsistency with how Erith treats Olivia vs. his children. I thought that this book would have been improved had Campbell had another 10,000 words to flesh some of this out. Ultimately, I did like the book, but I doubt I’ll re-read it. Oh, and the jam making at the end? I totally did not get that.
#11 by Ana on May 19, 2009 - 3:17 am
I never read any of her books and after reading the review and the comments, I don’t think I will. I am positive I will be driven insane by her storylines.
#12 by Tumperkin on May 19, 2009 - 5:17 am
Victoria – I love ‘romance goggles’! That’s a brilliant description of how I feel when reading certain romances. Sometimes the goggles are enough to keep certain frequencies of ludicrousness from impacting on my mind but the trouble with TTD for me was that it lacked internal logic. I think I can withstand a lot of nonsense in a book so long as it works logically within its own world. But when characters blatantly contradict themselves, I struggle. I think that was what I was trying – clumsily – to say with the high concept thing.
That said, you’ll have gotten from my review that I derived a degree of enjoyment from TTD. It wasn’t a wallbanger or a DNF, and given some of the books I’ve given up on in the past (technically far superior) I find myself wondering why…
Robin – on the whole I agree with you re the writing. As for the empowered whore who enjoys sex, I think I would find that difficult to buy and I thought the frigidity made more sense here. When I think of books with whore heroines (The Secret Pearl and No Man’s Mistress by Balogh spring to mind) their career has not been enjoyable although I think Balogh in those books did a very good job of showing women being empowered in the sense of choosing to use what they had to to survive. The books that I’ve read that maybe show heroines more actively empowered by their sold sexuality don’t feature whores so much as choosy courtesans/ selective mistresses. Women who have had actual relationships with the men they’ve slept with rather than a large number of punters. I’m thinking here of Sleeping Beauty by Ivory for example. This latter scenario is more morally ambiguous (for want of a better term) and easier to carry off than the former. I did a post on this some time ago – link below. Any thoughts on any particular books with these types of heroines that you’ve read?
http://tumperkin.blogspot.com/2008/01/classification-5-lady-is-tramp-i-mean.html
#13 by Janine on May 20, 2009 - 3:29 pm
Robin wrote:
I haven’t read Untouched but I felt the writing in Claiming the Courtesan was overwrought, and I had a hard time buying that heroine as ever having been a successful courtesan. So the problems you’re having with Campbell’s two most recent books are ones I had with Claiming the Courtesan.
Incidentally, I’m still hoping you get around to Putney’s Uncommon Vows someday, Robin. It’s my favorite captivity romance ever — and probably the only one I love.