Archive for: April, 2009

Top 10 Lies of the Romance Novel Hero and Heroine

Apr 18 2009 Published by under Genre musings

Lying to oneself is a special skill humans possess.

I know this because it happens to be one of my personal gifts. Unfortunately, my lies do not fool anyone else.

To wit, my college roomies once presented me with a list of “Jessica’s Top 5 Lies.” Number 5 was, “I do not eat everyone’s food.” And number 1 was, “I am not upset about this list.” (Thanks guys. Still not mad. Really.)

It occurred to me that one of the reasons I have such a special affinity for romance novels is that the heroes and heroines share my talent for self-deceit.

Without further ado, the Top 10 Lies of the Hero and Heroine:

10. We are only having sex to consummate the marriage. Just the once. Because we have to.

9. This isn’t love. It’s just (a) a fling [contemp], or (b) an arrangement [historical or Harlequin Presents], or (c) Fate [paranormal].

8. I am not jealous. Merely concerned. [Emphatic version: "Look at those fools falling all over him/her. I will never be one of them!"]

7. I do not think of my friend’s sister/former sister-in-law/friend’s nanny/best friend/ex-wife or girlfriend/coworker/employee as “hot.” Please.

6. I truly desire a proper/demure/safe/reliable spouse.

5. He doesn’t want me! He’s just repairing my house/babysitting my kid/offering me a job for which I am woefully unqualified/arranging to have my art shown/ “investigating” me  despite the fact that I was in Toledo when the crime occurred/otherwise constantly showing up — with a hammer/toy bat/v. thick pencil/v.v. thick paintbrush/gun in his pocket — for no apparent reason!

4. Leaving town without saying goodbye is a super way to fix things (Especially if I am (a) pregnant, (b) destitute, or (c) in mortal danger).

3. Having sex with him will get him out of my system!

2. I want her/him to marry that secondary character.

1. I regret what just happened.

Can you think of big ones I have missed???

Quiz

Match the book below with the lie above (some may fit more than one):

A. Sarah Mayberry, Anything For You
B. JR Ward, Lover Awakened
C. Susan Elizabeth Phillips, Dream A Little Dream
D. Julie Ann Long, Like No Other Lover
E. Victoria Dahl, Talk Me Down
F. Lisa Kleypas, Seduce Me At Sunrise
G. Any billionaire CEO in any Harlequin presents
H. Loretta Chase, Your Scandalous Ways
I. Julia Quinn, The Viscount Who Loved Me
J. Julie James, Just The Sexiest Man Alive
K. Lisa Kleypas, Devil In Winter
L. Judith McNaught, Whitney, My Love
M. Susan Mallery, Irresistable


15 responses so far

The Racy Romance Questionnaire Extraordinaire: It’s a Fourpeat!

Please join me in welcoming Nicola O. of Alpha Heroes.  One of the things I like best about Nicola’s blog is that her voice is very clear, to the point, and intelligent without being superficial or bitchy. Here’s an example, from her latest review, of a Samantha James:

I’ve been kind of cranky lately. I’ve been reading a lot of things that just feel all meh. I think it’s probably mostly me, but I’m going to take a little of it out on Samantha James anyway.

Now, how could you not finish a review post that begins that way?

Here are Nicola’s answers to the Racy Romance Questionnaire:

1. What motivated you to start your blog?

I couldn’t find enough RL people willing to talk about romance novels. Much less blather on about them at great length.

2. Are those still the reasons you blog?

Pretty much.

3. How has your blog changed since you started it?

Mostly technically. I try to include more graphic elements; I am more conscious of how frequently I’m posting, and I try to post less epic novellas. Self-editing, what a trip.

4. If you had to describe your blog to someone with an incredibly short attention span, how would you do it? (One word or fewer, please).

One word: Alphaheroes.

Two words: Romance Reviews

5. If you could only read one romance blog (other than your own, chica — I am one step ahead of your ego!) for a week on a desert island (knowing you would get all your faves back after that one week) which would it be?

Probably Literary Escapism. Jackie posts almost every day and has really good content. Not precisely romance, but there’s a lot of overlap.

6. Do you sometimes feel like blogging has taken over your life? And if not, what is the matter with you and why aren’t you more committed?

Jessica’s note: The fact that Nicola did not answer this one tells us everything we needed to know, doesn’t it? She’s clearly got another window open on her browser and is looking at her stats or drafting posts while trying to answer these questions.

7. What are your long term goals for your blog?

For best-selling authors to come to ME first and beg me to read their galleys.

8. What unique contribution to Romanceland does your blog make (can be a negative contribution if you’re feeling self-esteem challenged today)?

Huh. I like to think that I take a literate if not literary view of romance novels and give them a fair (and kind) review, along with opportunities for discussions, especially around character development.

9. What’s one thing another blogger does that you admire?

Hmm. Of course there are lots, but I really like JenB’s utter shamelessness and willingness to discuss ANYthing about romance books, especially things that a lot of us are privately wondering “does anyone else think this is WEIRD/GROSS/EXTREMELY HOTT ?”

10. Name a blog you enjoy that deserves way more readers.

I don’t know if she’s hurting for readers, but lately I’ve really been enjoying Ms. Moonlight.

Jessica’s note: Nicola is the first respondent who did not name check Triple R. I may have to rethink my loyalties.

11. How hot is your blog’s look? Choose one scale and rate yourself:

Vegetarian Rating scale: Scorching, Smoking, Glowing, Tingling, hot coffee, cup of tea (caffeinated), cup of tea (herbal), milk (tepid), O’Doul’s, ice water.

Heh. If we’re talking about overall attractiveness, I might go so far as Glowing. If we’re saying out and out sexiness, I’m more down by herbal tea. But my blog is SFW!

Carnivore Rating Scale: Christian Bale, Hugh Jackman, Denzel Washington, Nathan Fillion, Simon Baker, Zac Efron, Jonas Bros (all three), Jonas Bros (any one), Paul Giametti

I’m afraid I cannot acknowledge a scale of male pulchritude that doesn’t include Daniel Craig or David Beckham at least somewhere near the top, if not AT the top.

You mean this slovenly specimen? Shudder.

danielcraige2

Omnivore Rating scale: Christian Bale, Halle Berry, Hellboy, Charlize Theron, Doctor Manhattan, Daniel Radcliffe, Lady GaGa, Alf, iCarly, E.T.

iCarly is below Alf? Hahahaha. *wheeze*.

Jessica: YES! look:

imagesimages-1

12. Kindly enter the Blog Stat Slut Box (you can’t see it, but you now have a truth telling digital lasso around your computer and cannot lie. Also a purple sequined thong.) (FYI: there is a loophole for exaggeration, hyperbole, and false modesty)

a. Number of times a day you check your stats (readers, multiply by 3 to get a more accurate number):

2-3. If it’s a slow work day.

b. Give it up. How many subscribers do you have? Hits per day?

It’s all right there. I have 23 followers per the blogger widget. On a new-post day, I usually break 40 hits. My average is somewhere in the 30s. Of course, my all-time record-breaking day, infamously known as The Day of the Penis Post, I got something like 2000 hits.

c. Are you happy with those numbers? And if so, why don’t you have any ambition?

Well, they’re growing. And I don’t do naked men posts or erotica reviews, so there’s only so much I can hope for. *wink*

13. What’s one bit of advice you could offer to anyone thinking about buying a piece of real estate in Romanceland?

Link and comment, comment and link!

Thank you, Nicola!!


7 responses so far

Duelling Review: Kiss of a Demon King, by Kresley Cole

Apr 16 2009 Published by under Duelling/Joint Reviews

Tumperkin and Jessica review KOADK to the death.

Whose death? Yours, dear reader: it’s very, very long.

On the plus side, before your mortal coil completely unravels, Tumperkin will reveal KFC’s (the “F” is for “fantastically fungible”) Top Secret Recipe for cooking up another addictive installment of Immortals After Dark, and Jessica talks about Cole as a Master Muffin Tease.

women-pistol-dueling

TUMPERKIN’s TAKE:

So Jessica, it might fairly be said that your suggestion that we jointly review Kiss of a Demon King by Kresley Cole is timely for me. I’ve been glomming Cole’s books insanely for the last couple of months. I read No Rest for the Wicked at the recommendation of Meriam and that was it. I glommed the whole Immortals After Dark series (with the exception of the Myst and Nikolai novella) and KOADK was the last of that lot. Then I decided to try one of her historicals and plumped for If You Deceive on the basis of the plot description. After finishing that, I promptly ordered the other two in the If You… trilogy plus The Price of Pleasure, her second novel which predates both the IAD and If You… series.

This is almost embarrassing.

In fact scratch that. It is embarrassing. All the more so because I am hopelessly aware that I am being expertly played when I read a Kresley Cole. (This awareness is perhaps, admittedly, heightened by the fact that I’ve read so bloody many of them over the last couple of months). Ms Cole follows a distinct formula in her books. But perhaps I shouldn’t use the word ‘formula’ given its negative connotations? Perhaps recipe? A successful, brilliant recipe that I admire and that produces a story that appeals to me greatly:

Kresley Cole Book Recipe

Ingredients:

One (1) huge great moody brute of a man, preferably a Highlander

One (1) delicate-appearing but nonetheless tough cookie of a heroine

Large amounts of extreme conflict

Method:

1. Roughly mix the hero and heroine into a situation with lots of the conflict

2. Gradually allow the hero and heroine to work up to a full sex scene. You should aim for at least 4 or 5 sexual scenes of some variety before full consummation is allowed at (nod to Meriam) approximately page 200-250.

3. Post consummation, subject heroine to some unspeakable horror, the object of which is to make her suffer extreme physical pain/ death (e.g. immolation, cholera) and the hero experience inconsolable loss and heartbreak.

4. Allow hero to save heroine whilst endlessly self-acknowledging his ‘need’ to ‘protect’ her.

The thing about a formula (or recipe) is that there’s a certain addiction to getting the fix of it over and over again. I know – I acknowledge freely – that as a romance reader there is something that I am looking to experience repeatedly.

So what is it with Cole for me?

Confession time. I like romance novels in which the heroine really suffers. The worse it gets for them, the better I like it (gosh I sound awful, don’t I?). And (this confession gets worse) I have a particular weakness for books in which the hero is partly culpable for the suffering. I’ve really not got round to thinking about trying to puzzle out the whys of that one. That may be a post for another day.  Or perhaps a course of therapy.

I hasten to add that there is a condition to this particular preference of mine. The heroines must not be made abject by their suffering. They must meet the suffering with -well not with recklessness, I am not a fan of futile gestures – but with strength and a certain courage. They must survive it.

Ms Cole’s books deliver on this for me in a Very Big Way. Her heroines really go through the mill and they survive. And perhaps, in KOADK she gives us in Sabine, the ultimate survivor heroine.

Ok, so the story. Rydstrom is a 1500 year old rage demon. (I’m not actually so big on the demons. I prefer the weres and the vamps *shrugs*) He lost his crown to Omort the Deathless many hundreds of years ago and has been trying to get it back ever since with his brother Cade (who was the hero of the last book in this series).

Omort the Deathless is an evil despot given to acts of spontaneous brutality and general meanness. He is a sorceri and presides over a fairly unpleasant sounding court of other evil personages, including the heroine, Sabine, one of his hundreds of half-siblings. The Sorceri are interesting – they exhibit a vast range of magic powers and have the ability to steal each other’s powers and transfer them to others at will. I imagine that if you were child, it would be fun to play at being Sorceri, since you can pretty much have the power to do anything.

Sabine’s power is casting illusions. Her sister Lanthe’s power is ‘persuasion’. In other words, Lanthe can get anyone to act as she wants them to against their will by mere command. However, it is a power that is easily exhausted and she has all but depleted it ‘persuading’ Sabine to live since Sabine has a habit of getting murdered.

It has been prophesied that Sabine will bear Rydstrom a child who will unlock a powerful magical well. Despite being in love with Sabine (so far as an Evil despot can love) Omort encourages Sabine to use her illusions to capture Rydstrom and try to seduce him.

Sabine is the ultimate Cole survivor heroine. She’s been killed heaps of times and clawed her way back from each death. And it’s not as though all these murders give her a free pass from stage 3 of the recipe. She still has to go through the inevitable unspeakable suffering and be saved by Rydstrom.

One thing I liked about Sabine is that she’s not unaffected by all the suffering she’s undergone in her life. She’s beyond a being a mere tough cookie. She’s cunning and mendacious and self-seeking. But – and this is always the case with Cole heroines – she’s basically lovable. I suppose this is where my main quibble with the book arises. There is a bit of a Gap between how Sabine sees herself and how I the reader saw her. Sabine refers to herself throughout the book as being an evil villainess but I could never have seen her in that light. Evil villainesses don’t worry about their servants or get annoyed when others inflict pain upon their prisoners.

There are various ways you can deal with this Gap as a reader. You might put it down to her culture (the Sorceri see themselves as the baddies) or her self-esteem after hundreds of years of nerve-wracking attendance at Omort’s court.

But for me, it just basically didn’t entirely work. I’d have preferred her to be more in tune with who I felt she really was.

Which is not to say I didn’t like Sabine. I did. (Survivor you see). Rydstrom I was less keen on. I think of all Cole’s heroes, he is the one I have liked least. In the previous books, he has been presented as a logical rage demon who – uncharacteristically – never loses his cool. Yet he spends most of this book in a rage. Perhaps the point of this was that Sabine was the woman to finally make him lose his cool. Unfortunately, I’m not keen on H/H conflicts that have anger at their core. Where there is a core of unadulterated anger, I just worry about how things will work out between the H/H in the longer term. And Rydstrom spent a lot of this book being angry at Sabine.

KOADK delivers on the classic Cole recipe and it’s entertaining.  To be picky, I didn’t find it quite as pacy or quite as much fun as some of the others. Definitely not the best in the series. However, in fairness, I should acknowledge that this was sixth IAD book I’d read in just a couple of months. And in light of that, reading it was bit like eating a sixth slice of chocolate cheesecake.

I wish I could say that I will stop glomming Ms Cole now. That I will put the two If Yous… and The Price of Pleasure that arrived yesterday to one side and ration myself a bit more.

Are you going to make me give a grade, Jessica? If I must, a B-.

JESSICA’S RIPOSTE:

Tumperkin, I love your KFC Recipe, but, like those annoying Epicurious.com commenters who are so sure they can improve a master chef’s recipe by adding a cup of sugar and some Cheez Whiz, I am going to boldly add a couple of steps:

1.5 Hero, after token resistance to the idea (she’s so obviously wrong for him), realizes heroine is his fated soul mate and commences trying to convince her of this fact for the entire book

2.5 Raunchiness and frequency of sex talk inversely proportional to amount of sex actually being had (earning her the appellation, Master Muffin Tease)

2.5.5 Consummation includes recognition by heroine that hero was right all along about this “fated mate” thing.

This is the 4th in Cole’s Immortals After Dark series that I have read (I skipped the ghost one — you can thank JR Ward for my allergic reaction to THAT plotline), and, like Tumperkin, I have enjoyed them all.

Something unique about Cole is the way she mixes very old school elements with a very 21st century take on gender. In all of the IAD installments, you have a sexually inexperienced heroine paired with a hero whose ability to give orgasms is so powerful he fears he may literally break the heroine in two, and this is no less true in KOADK. But Cole overlays that traditional matchup with something very modern that destabilizes the expected balance of bedroom power: the heroine has the hero chained up in her bed and sexually torments him, while the hero, for all his thousands of conquests, had been celibate for centuries and can only have an orgasm with his One True Mate.

I agree with you completely, Tumperkin, about the way Cole builds sexual tension and only allows her hero and heroine to consummate their relationship once they are in love. This is very Old School. But having them tie each other up and spank each other on the way to the Big O is not in your grandma’s romance novel.  Cole’s heroes in particular, can be very graphic, even crude, from page one, about their desires for the heroine, but like gentlemen of yore, they withhold themselves until everything is safe and everyone is emotionally ready (hence, the book’s status for its female readers as a Muffin Tease).

Further, you have the traditional sexy, tiny heroine, and big strapping hero. She’s talky and he’s taciturn. He’s all about honor and principle and she’s Freud’s view of women sprung to life: narcissistic, manipulative, and deceitful. All very Old School. But now reverse it: deep down, he’s lonely and wants a spouse more than anything, he is insecure at not having found his mate, while all his friends are paired up, he’s incapable of orgasm, he’s embarrassed by sexual fantasies that do not become him, and he’s a powerful career person who secretly wants to be dominated in the bedroom. Sounds like a common species of the contemporary heroine, doesn’t it? For her part, Sabine is ruthless and gets what she wants, only wants Rydstrom to advance her career, she pries into his mind to discover his sexual fantasies and uses them to gain power over him, etc. Sounds like a billionaire CEO doesn’t it?

Cole plays around with gender expectations not just in the H/H. relationships but all over the book. One of my favorite examples is the scene when Rydstrom comes home to his mansion in Louisiana and finds the place trashed.  Empty kegs, underwear hanging from the chandelier, pornographic magazines laying around. Except instead of beer-soaked Hustler’s, it’s beer-soaked Playgirl magazines: yes, folks, it’s the witches and Valkyries, not the men, who have been partying in the King’s absence.

And this juxtaposition of Playgirl and Lordly Lore reminds me of something else, which is not unique to Cole, but is such a strong feature of the series I wanted to mention it: the mix of 21st century (middle class) American life with ancient/fantasy cultures. Sherrilyn Kenyon, Laurell K. Hamilton, JR Ward also do this sort of thing, of course. I enjoy entering the world of the IAD, mainly because I like the people in it. However, I find that the quick switches in tone and setting (from a bloody death battle to pop culture laced girl gossip between Sabine and her sister Lanthe, for example) detract from my ability to tale any of the “Lore” seriously.

SPOILERS

*

*

*

When I think about KOADK, the moment in the book when Sabine runs away into the Lousiana night and Rydstrom runs after her, and then, back in the mansion, slumps down and realizes he can’t live like this, was much more memorable and powerful than the moment when he decides to give up his kingdom for her.

*

*

*

END SPOILERS

To me, the paranormal and fantasy elements add to the fun, but not as much to the drama.

Tumperkin, you mention that Sabine’s self image doesn’t match what we know of her, and I agree. I note that this type of low self-image is very common among heroes, so I view this as another example of Cole’s gender bending. But, following along with your observation, there is a vast difference between a bitch and a badass, a selfish woman and an evil sorceress, a snarky person and a cruel person.  Sabine never really crosses that line, in my opinion.  I, too, enjoyed Sabine, unlike some other reviewers who felt she “wasn’t good enough” for the hero: she certainly made me laugh out loud more than once (I loved the scene when she argued that “fighting solves everything”).  It was enough of a conflict for me to have morally upstanding hero and a selfish deceitful heroine, so while the Sabine’s self image as “Eeeeeeeebil” didn’t work for me, it’s working also wasn’t necessary for me to get wrapped up in the relationship.

I do wish more time had been spent on their divergent moral views. Did Sabine have a point when she defended cunning, deceit, self-interestedness, and violence as a first resort? To take just one example, it was a very powerful moment in the text when Rydstrom lied to Sabine, but the ramifications of that lie on his character and on their relationship were not given their due.

Like you, Tumperkin, I will absolutely continue reading the IAD, and you may also have convinced me to give a Cole hisoptrical a try.

I leave you with two totally unsupported subjective opinions:

1. I respectfully request that the phrase “feed me into you” when spoken in reference to the hero’s penis be banned from all of romance for ever more. The connotations are ALL WRONG. Shudder.

2. Enough with the horned heroes. There’s a reason none of the heroes on demon romance novel covers are shown with their horns. And that reason is this: horns are gross. (I don’t find rhinos or goats sexy, either, by the way.)

In conclusion, who wins this duel? Clearly, it’s a TKO for Kresley Cole.

21 responses so far

Capitalism and Sexuality in the Romance Novel

Apr 12 2009 Published by under Academia, Genre musings

Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association Annual Meeting
April 2009, New Orleans

These are my notes, and may not reflect with perfect accuracy the views of the presenters. If you are interested in following up, I suggest you email the author for a copy of her paper.

This session focused on capitalism, sex, and culture in writing the romance. Books by Judith McNaught, Brenda Jackson, Georgette Heyer, Cathy Maxwell, and Kayla Perrin were discussed.

Continue Reading »

4 responses so far

BDSM, Anah Crow, JD Robb, Jennifer Crusie, Megan Hart

Apr 11 2009 Published by under Academia, Genre musings

Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association Annual Meeting April 2009, New Orleans

Again, my (sketchy) notes. Hopefully I did the papers justice!

“The Romance of Pain: Sadomasochism and Power Exchange in Popular Romance Fiction”, Sarah Frantz, Fayetteville State University

Continue Reading »

16 responses so far

Academics Sucking the Blood From Twilight

Apr 10 2009 Published by under Academia, Vampires

Once again, here are my totally fallible notes from sessions at the Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association Annual Meeting
April 2009, New Orleans.

There were a number of Twilight papers, and I attended several, despite not having read any of Meyer’s books, because often these papers discussed Sookie Stackhouse as well.

Continue Reading »

8 responses so far

Academic Talks on Nora Roberts, Mary Stewart, Laura Kinsale, and Grace Livingston Hill

Apr 10 2009 Published by under Academia, Genre musings

More summaries from the April 2009 Pop Culture Association Conference, this time a romance panel featuring some of the bloggers at Teach me Tonight! As usual with these posts, keep the possibility of human error (mine) in mind.

“Me, Myself, and I: Love As the Integration of selves in the romance fiction of Nora Roberts”, An Goris, doctoral candidate, U. of Louvain, Belgium

NR always engages with basic narrative conventions of romance genre, but also marred by numerous forms of diversity. Goris focuses on 8 books, out of NR’s 200. Love is presented as a complex, multifaceted, ambiguous emotions. Love as both huge and scary, disruptive, but also simple, basic, real – life’s basis. H/H experience love first as one, then as the other. Calls process the “integration of selves”. Can see this in NR’s writing in her representation of body, mind, and relationships.

Conceptual dichotomy, mind v. body, rational v. irrational, artificial v. natural. Body as vessel of emotional truth. Ex. Characters go pale when shocked, prior to even realizing cognitively they are shocked. Ex. Characters need to touch each other prior to recognition of feelings. H/H emotional journey from conflict to harmony b/t mind and body.

Continue Reading »

11 responses so far

Two JR Ward Papers at the Pop Culture Association Conference

Apr 09 2009 Published by under Academia, Vampires

This was an 8:00am session at the Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association Annual Meeting (April 2009) with 4 papers, 2 on Chelsea Quinn Yarbro, 2 on the Black Dagger Brotherhood. Since the caffeine had not kicked in until the Ward papers, I present my notes on those only.

Maria Lindgren Leavenworth, Umea University, Sweden, “Lover Revamped: Sexualities and Romance in the Black Dagger Brotherhood and Fan Fiction”

This was a fantastic paper.

Fan fic addressed [you can Google these]: “One Treasured Memory”, “Skin to Skin”, “Forever Lovers”

Fan focus on gaps in the source text and develop alternative readings. Slash text challenges heteronormativity in the source text and recasts relationships as m/m erotic relationships. Slash may seem to offer a great deal of freedom, but the heteronormative framework of the source text is quite limiting.

The vampires’ vampirism does not seem to matter in the BDB. The main thing is the relationships.

Homosociality and homosexuality is a blurry line in the BDB. Homoerotic attraction is presented as problematic in the text, while homophobia is rejected. Homosexuality is fine, just not with them.

V. repeatedly states that “everything about Jane feels right”, a rejection of homoerotic desire as something that needs to be cured.

This tension is addressed in the slash, but the desires are presented as unreal or temporary. They are written as dreams, or as events, the memory of which can be destroyed via magic. Denial of homosexuality as extending beyond this particular association.  This attraction jeopardizes Butch and V.’s friendship and the relationships of the BDBD.

A temporary space where homoerotic desires can be explored has, but there are no real consequences for the characters outside the space.

Women are presented as being attuned to the sexual tension, and allow V. and Butch to engage in sexual activity.

Refers to simultaneous orgasms as a “perpetuated myth of the genre”. Hah.

“Genre itself is limited to heterosexual desire”, so Ward is limited and even the fanfics are limited.

[Maria attributes this to the genre, not the Ward.]

She also notes a tension between the opening up of the universe on Ward’s own website by having the characters “show up” and be interviewed, yet her militant protection of her own copyright and rejection of the use by fans of her material.

Jessica Price, University of Cincinnati, Women’s Studies and Gender and Sexuality Department “Heteronormativity and Masculinity: Sexuality and Gender in JR Ward’s Black Dagger Brotherhood”

[Price make a number of interesting points. I can’t say I felt them gel. As with many papers at this conference, the difference between a fan and a scholar was not coming through to me on this one.]

Price mentions attending a Ward signing. She asked Ward whether there would be more homosexuals in the BDB. She notes that at the signing, the idea of more homosexual men was received with great interest, but when she asked whether there would be a lesbian warrior was greeted with silence.

Ward herself said she “writes men”. Price notes that Ward herself has admitted to being influenced by fan desires.  On the other hand, Price notes that Ward has said “The stories in my head are in charge”.

Price notes the tension here in Ward’s account of how she writes. Price asks, “So why can’t Payne show up in Ward’s head and say ‘I want to fuck a woman?’”

Representation of alternative sexual expression – “V. has very specific ways of having sex” [My note: we all have “very specific ways of having sex”. We just don’t call vanilla hetero sex “a very specific way” because it is widespread and normative.]

Notes that female characters are either virgins, women who do not enjoy sex, or prostitutes.
Jessica notes that Ward participates in her own fan fiction, inserts herself as a character interacting with the brothers.

Xhex [Price pronounces it “Hex.”] is only example of sexuality without a penis in the BDB. But Xhex will be paired with John Matthew, thus denying her her own book.

The BDB attempts to queer the notion of the romance novel. Asks the reader to open their minds to different sexualities and gender performances.

Audience questions:

Q: How has the imposition of the romance genre changed the vampire genre? It is a very different experience of the vampire, and it has becomes so huge.

A1: Candace: “The literary vampires often cannot get a hard on, They use fangs instead. With the romance novel vampires…good lord.”

A2. Jessica: “Yes, it’s a hypersexuality. It’s all about getting inside something.”

A3. Candace talks about a novella in which the heroine gives Viagra to the vampire hero!

[My note: raises the question of whether vampire romance needs vampires.]

A4. Candace described Lara Adrian’s series as “BDB lite.” Says “You’ve got this lovely situation where vampires do not turn human lovers, but if they mate, the woman gets all the benefits of vampirism without bad consequences. It’s an interesting take on it.”

Sarah F: Would be interesting to do a study on how the genre affects how vampires are constructed. [My note: there have been negative studies, on how romance and the proliferation of vampires across genres has diluted the originary vampire myth and is “not really vampire.”]

11 responses so far

« Newer posts Older posts »

Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: