<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: A Kiss of Shadows, Laurell K. Hamilton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/</link>
	<description>Book Reviews, Philosophy, Academic Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jillyfae</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>jillyfae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard that with the last book in this series, LKH did a very good job actually ending it, and tying all the loose ends together.  I would never try audio for anything she wrote, however, as most do need some skimming.

However, the first three Anita Blake books are quite good, (though romance-free), and are the only ones I kept after the later ones lost all plot and reasonable character development in favor of really complex (and yes, whiny!) sexual escapades. (I sold the six in the middle I&#039;d somehow picked up.)

I really recommend stopping at #3, rather than slogging all the way to #9, since then you have to suffer through what is, IMHO/YMMV etc, a really badly done excessive love-triangle thing.  Which, from what blurbs I&#039;ve seen on the later books, has worked its way up to a badly done excessive love-dodacahedron, but I could be exaggerating a bit.

eta: If you can get your hands on &lt;i&gt;Nightseer&lt;/i&gt;, which is a fantasy LKH wrote before she started Anita Blake, I recall that as being pretty good, though I haven&#039;t read it in years, so my memory could be a bit foggy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard that with the last book in this series, LKH did a very good job actually ending it, and tying all the loose ends together.  I would never try audio for anything she wrote, however, as most do need some skimming.</p>
<p>However, the first three Anita Blake books are quite good, (though romance-free), and are the only ones I kept after the later ones lost all plot and reasonable character development in favor of really complex (and yes, whiny!) sexual escapades. (I sold the six in the middle I&#8217;d somehow picked up.)</p>
<p>I really recommend stopping at #3, rather than slogging all the way to #9, since then you have to suffer through what is, IMHO/YMMV etc, a really badly done excessive love-triangle thing.  Which, from what blurbs I&#8217;ve seen on the later books, has worked its way up to a badly done excessive love-dodacahedron, but I could be exaggerating a bit.</p>
<p>eta: If you can get your hands on <i>Nightseer</i>, which is a fantasy LKH wrote before she started Anita Blake, I recall that as being pretty good, though I haven&#8217;t read it in years, so my memory could be a bit foggy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2442</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a problem with porn, but I agree these books aren&#039;t it. I don&#039;t think they&#039;re erotica either because while I will totally admit I read every new book, in hardback, she writes, I don&#039;t think her sex scenes are particularly evocative or interesting. 

I think they&#039;re urban fantasy with romantic elements, but labels are confusing that way since she straddles a few genre boundaries.

Merry has more self reflection than Anita does, which I do like and I really enjoy it when LKH delves into the customs and culture of the Seelie and Unseelie courts and I wish she&#039;d take up more page space with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with porn, but I agree these books aren&#8217;t it. I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re erotica either because while I will totally admit I read every new book, in hardback, she writes, I don&#8217;t think her sex scenes are particularly evocative or interesting. </p>
<p>I think they&#8217;re urban fantasy with romantic elements, but labels are confusing that way since she straddles a few genre boundaries.</p>
<p>Merry has more self reflection than Anita does, which I do like and I really enjoy it when LKH delves into the customs and culture of the Seelie and Unseelie courts and I wish she&#8217;d take up more page space with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kati</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2440</link>
		<dc:creator>Kati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2440</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to admit, I *love* this series. Yes, it&#039;s not the best written. Yes, there are some huge plot holes. And yes, LKH could do with a serious editor.

But wow, I love these books like a fat girl loves cake. 

Mostly because of Doyle. I know, he&#039;s not even really a hero, and yet, I&#039;m totally intrigued by him. Now, there are definitely parts that I look away from (any form of goblin sex), but the torture doesn&#039;t really phase me, and the multiple sex partners thing doesn&#039;t bother me at all. I won&#039;t buy them in HC, but when they&#039;re out in PB, I&#039;m more than happy to plunk down the money for them (thus, enabling the skimming of LKH&#039;s fatal flaw: too much exposition). Most of the time  when I&#039;m done with them I have a vague ucky feeling, which seems to go away when the next one comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to admit, I *love* this series. Yes, it&#8217;s not the best written. Yes, there are some huge plot holes. And yes, LKH could do with a serious editor.</p>
<p>But wow, I love these books like a fat girl loves cake. </p>
<p>Mostly because of Doyle. I know, he&#8217;s not even really a hero, and yet, I&#8217;m totally intrigued by him. Now, there are definitely parts that I look away from (any form of goblin sex), but the torture doesn&#8217;t really phase me, and the multiple sex partners thing doesn&#8217;t bother me at all. I won&#8217;t buy them in HC, but when they&#8217;re out in PB, I&#8217;m more than happy to plunk down the money for them (thus, enabling the skimming of LKH&#8217;s fatal flaw: too much exposition). Most of the time  when I&#8217;m done with them I have a vague ucky feeling, which seems to go away when the next one comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Janssen</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2439</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Janssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2439</guid>
		<description>I did like the first three Anita Blake books.  They were, to me, noir detective stories except for the fantasy element.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did like the first three Anita Blake books.  They were, to me, noir detective stories except for the fantasy element.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Chris&lt;/b&gt; wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;And, sadly, this book has more of a comprehensible plot than the following ones…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It felt like it kept turning at right angles. Like LKH did not know where she wanted to go until she sat down to write it.

&lt;b&gt;@ Lusty Reader&lt;/b&gt;:
Er, thanks a lot for sharing!

&lt;b&gt;JenB&lt;/b&gt; wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Duuuuude…you finished this one? I made it through three hours and decided I’d either have to turn it off or fling myself off a tall building. I turned it off.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

OMG. I so appreciate your sharing my pain. Thank you.

&lt;b&gt;RfP&lt;/b&gt; wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Since you’re not going to continue the series, I’ll share one of my fave finds: a condensed version of Mistral’s Kiss (Merry book 5).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Coffee? Meet keyboard. Poor Sholto.

&lt;b&gt;Mistress&lt;/b&gt; wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;But I didn’t last 5 mins with this audio book. But that’s because IMO Laural Merlington was the worst possible narrator choice. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree. Sounds too mature. Needed more of an ingenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Chris</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>And, sadly, this book has more of a comprehensible plot than the following ones…</p></blockquote>
<p>It felt like it kept turning at right angles. Like LKH did not know where she wanted to go until she sat down to write it.</p>
<p><b>@ Lusty Reader</b>:<br />
Er, thanks a lot for sharing!</p>
<p><b>JenB</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Duuuuude…you finished this one? I made it through three hours and decided I’d either have to turn it off or fling myself off a tall building. I turned it off.</p></blockquote>
<p>OMG. I so appreciate your sharing my pain. Thank you.</p>
<p><b>RfP</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Since you’re not going to continue the series, I’ll share one of my fave finds: a condensed version of Mistral’s Kiss (Merry book 5).</p></blockquote>
<p>Coffee? Meet keyboard. Poor Sholto.</p>
<p><b>Mistress</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>But I didn’t last 5 mins with this audio book. But that’s because IMO Laural Merlington was the worst possible narrator choice. </p></blockquote>
<p>I agree. Sounds too mature. Needed more of an ingenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mistress</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2437</link>
		<dc:creator>Mistress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2437</guid>
		<description>Smut&#039;s the phrase I use for books of this sort,the middle ground btwn Erotica and Romance. My theory is if a Romance novel is dessert with substance; then smut is just more frosting then cake. As and example,I categorize The Black Dagger Brotherhood books as smut. I&#039;m honestly only there for the sexual tension filled verbal parrying, the angtsy hunks and the kinky mating frenzy; sure to ensue. The chapters from the alphabet gang&#039;s POV re: their hijinks/plotting and the most of the action scenes, bore me to tears, so I skim them. So I guess the the porn line, comes down to reader perspective .

This series is one of my favorite guilty pleasures (to read), in a fun para smut way. But I didn&#039;t last 5 mins with this audio book. But that&#039;s because IMO Laural Merlington was the worst possible narrator choice. She has a attractive voice, reminds me a bit of Judi Dench, but all wrong for this character and this series. With Audio books if the narrator is &quot;off&quot; it ruins the experience for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smut&#8217;s the phrase I use for books of this sort,the middle ground btwn Erotica and Romance. My theory is if a Romance novel is dessert with substance; then smut is just more frosting then cake. As and example,I categorize The Black Dagger Brotherhood books as smut. I&#8217;m honestly only there for the sexual tension filled verbal parrying, the angtsy hunks and the kinky mating frenzy; sure to ensue. The chapters from the alphabet gang&#8217;s POV re: their hijinks/plotting and the most of the action scenes, bore me to tears, so I skim them. So I guess the the porn line, comes down to reader perspective .</p>
<p>This series is one of my favorite guilty pleasures (to read), in a fun para smut way. But I didn&#8217;t last 5 mins with this audio book. But that&#8217;s because IMO Laural Merlington was the worst possible narrator choice. She has a attractive voice, reminds me a bit of Judi Dench, but all wrong for this character and this series. With Audio books if the narrator is &#8220;off&#8221; it ruins the experience for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RfP</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>RfP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan of the Anita books, in part because their sexual ethos is quite different and in part because everyone is So Damn Whiny.  I liked the more egalitarian framework that you noted in the Merry Gentry books; that kept me reading for several books despite some pretty awful clunkers in the writing.

Since you&#039;re not going to continue the series, I&#039;ll share one of my fave finds: a &lt;a href=&quot;http://helen-keeble.livejournal.com/28618.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;condensed version of &lt;i&gt;Mistral&#039;s Kiss&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (Merry book 5).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of the Anita books, in part because their sexual ethos is quite different and in part because everyone is So Damn Whiny.  I liked the more egalitarian framework that you noted in the Merry Gentry books; that kept me reading for several books despite some pretty awful clunkers in the writing.</p>
<p>Since you&#8217;re not going to continue the series, I&#8217;ll share one of my fave finds: a <a href="http://helen-keeble.livejournal.com/28618.html" rel="nofollow">condensed version of <i>Mistral&#8217;s Kiss</i></a> (Merry book 5).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JenB</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2434</link>
		<dc:creator>JenB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2434</guid>
		<description>Oh, BTW, the first Anita Blake book kicks ass. It&#039;s the only one I&#039;ve read, but most people say 1-9 are great. My husband even read the series, and so did my boss (also male).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, BTW, the first Anita Blake book kicks ass. It&#8217;s the only one I&#8217;ve read, but most people say 1-9 are great. My husband even read the series, and so did my boss (also male).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JenB</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2433</link>
		<dc:creator>JenB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2433</guid>
		<description>Duuuuude...you finished this one? I made it through three hours and decided I&#039;d either have to turn it off or fling myself off a tall building. I turned it off.

The narration was so slow that the first sex scene lasted more than 30 minutes. That&#039;s longer than most sex acts.

This is one of the few books that just doesn&#039;t translate well to audio. It would&#039;ve taken 3-4 hours to read the paperback. 15 hours of audio is just tooooooo long.

Kudos to you for sticking it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duuuuude&#8230;you finished this one? I made it through three hours and decided I&#8217;d either have to turn it off or fling myself off a tall building. I turned it off.</p>
<p>The narration was so slow that the first sex scene lasted more than 30 minutes. That&#8217;s longer than most sex acts.</p>
<p>This is one of the few books that just doesn&#8217;t translate well to audio. It would&#8217;ve taken 3-4 hours to read the paperback. 15 hours of audio is just tooooooo long.</p>
<p>Kudos to you for sticking it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lusty Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/04/28/review-a-kiss-of-shadows-laurell-k-hamilton/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Lusty Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2652#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the warning re: most disturbing form of torture. I only read the first 4 Anita Blake books and will NEVER get this one scene out of my head where a toddler was murdered and Anita is having a &quot;who has more balls&quot; contest with her policeman friends so she tosses the chubby, severed toddler hand at him.

::infinite shudders::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the warning re: most disturbing form of torture. I only read the first 4 Anita Blake books and will NEVER get this one scene out of my head where a toddler was murdered and Anita is having a &#8220;who has more balls&#8221; contest with her policeman friends so she tosses the chubby, severed toddler hand at him.</p>
<p>::infinite shudders::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.readreactreview.com @ 2012-02-11 08:22:24 -->
