Tumperkin and Jessica review KOADK to the death.
Whose death? Yours, dear reader: it’s very, very long.
On the plus side, before your mortal coil completely unravels, Tumperkin will reveal KFC’s (the “F” is for “fantastically fungible”) Top Secret Recipe for cooking up another addictive installment of Immortals After Dark, and Jessica talks about Cole as a Master Muffin Tease.

TUMPERKIN’s TAKE:
So Jessica, it might fairly be said that your suggestion that we jointly review Kiss of a Demon King by Kresley Cole is timely for me. I’ve been glomming Cole’s books insanely for the last couple of months. I read No Rest for the Wicked at the recommendation of Meriam and that was it. I glommed the whole Immortals After Dark series (with the exception of the Myst and Nikolai novella) and KOADK was the last of that lot. Then I decided to try one of her historicals and plumped for If You Deceive on the basis of the plot description. After finishing that, I promptly ordered the other two in the If You… trilogy plus The Price of Pleasure, her second novel which predates both the IAD and If You… series.
This is almost embarrassing.
In fact scratch that. It is embarrassing. All the more so because I am hopelessly aware that I am being expertly played when I read a Kresley Cole. (This awareness is perhaps, admittedly, heightened by the fact that I’ve read so bloody many of them over the last couple of months). Ms Cole follows a distinct formula in her books. But perhaps I shouldn’t use the word ‘formula’ given its negative connotations? Perhaps recipe? A successful, brilliant recipe that I admire and that produces a story that appeals to me greatly:
Kresley Cole Book Recipe
Ingredients:
One (1) huge great moody brute of a man, preferably a Highlander
One (1) delicate-appearing but nonetheless tough cookie of a heroine
Large amounts of extreme conflict
Method:
1. Roughly mix the hero and heroine into a situation with lots of the conflict
2. Gradually allow the hero and heroine to work up to a full sex scene. You should aim for at least 4 or 5 sexual scenes of some variety before full consummation is allowed at (nod to Meriam) approximately page 200-250.
3. Post consummation, subject heroine to some unspeakable horror, the object of which is to make her suffer extreme physical pain/ death (e.g. immolation, cholera) and the hero experience inconsolable loss and heartbreak.
4. Allow hero to save heroine whilst endlessly self-acknowledging his ‘need’ to ‘protect’ her.
The thing about a formula (or recipe) is that there’s a certain addiction to getting the fix of it over and over again. I know – I acknowledge freely – that as a romance reader there is something that I am looking to experience repeatedly.
So what is it with Cole for me?
Confession time. I like romance novels in which the heroine really suffers. The worse it gets for them, the better I like it (gosh I sound awful, don’t I?). And (this confession gets worse) I have a particular weakness for books in which the hero is partly culpable for the suffering. I’ve really not got round to thinking about trying to puzzle out the whys of that one. That may be a post for another day. Or perhaps a course of therapy.
I hasten to add that there is a condition to this particular preference of mine. The heroines must not be made abject by their suffering. They must meet the suffering with -well not with recklessness, I am not a fan of futile gestures – but with strength and a certain courage. They must survive it.
Ms Cole’s books deliver on this for me in a Very Big Way. Her heroines really go through the mill and they survive. And perhaps, in KOADK she gives us in Sabine, the ultimate survivor heroine.
Ok, so the story. Rydstrom is a 1500 year old rage demon. (I’m not actually so big on the demons. I prefer the weres and the vamps *shrugs*) He lost his crown to Omort the Deathless many hundreds of years ago and has been trying to get it back ever since with his brother Cade (who was the hero of the last book in this series).
Omort the Deathless is an evil despot given to acts of spontaneous brutality and general meanness. He is a sorceri and presides over a fairly unpleasant sounding court of other evil personages, including the heroine, Sabine, one of his hundreds of half-siblings. The Sorceri are interesting – they exhibit a vast range of magic powers and have the ability to steal each other’s powers and transfer them to others at will. I imagine that if you were child, it would be fun to play at being Sorceri, since you can pretty much have the power to do anything.
Sabine’s power is casting illusions. Her sister Lanthe’s power is ‘persuasion’. In other words, Lanthe can get anyone to act as she wants them to against their will by mere command. However, it is a power that is easily exhausted and she has all but depleted it ‘persuading’ Sabine to live since Sabine has a habit of getting murdered.
It has been prophesied that Sabine will bear Rydstrom a child who will unlock a powerful magical well. Despite being in love with Sabine (so far as an Evil despot can love) Omort encourages Sabine to use her illusions to capture Rydstrom and try to seduce him.
Sabine is the ultimate Cole survivor heroine. She’s been killed heaps of times and clawed her way back from each death. And it’s not as though all these murders give her a free pass from stage 3 of the recipe. She still has to go through the inevitable unspeakable suffering and be saved by Rydstrom.
One thing I liked about Sabine is that she’s not unaffected by all the suffering she’s undergone in her life. She’s beyond a being a mere tough cookie. She’s cunning and mendacious and self-seeking. But – and this is always the case with Cole heroines – she’s basically lovable. I suppose this is where my main quibble with the book arises. There is a bit of a Gap between how Sabine sees herself and how I the reader saw her. Sabine refers to herself throughout the book as being an evil villainess but I could never have seen her in that light. Evil villainesses don’t worry about their servants or get annoyed when others inflict pain upon their prisoners.
There are various ways you can deal with this Gap as a reader. You might put it down to her culture (the Sorceri see themselves as the baddies) or her self-esteem after hundreds of years of nerve-wracking attendance at Omort’s court.
But for me, it just basically didn’t entirely work. I’d have preferred her to be more in tune with who I felt she really was.
Which is not to say I didn’t like Sabine. I did. (Survivor you see). Rydstrom I was less keen on. I think of all Cole’s heroes, he is the one I have liked least. In the previous books, he has been presented as a logical rage demon who – uncharacteristically – never loses his cool. Yet he spends most of this book in a rage. Perhaps the point of this was that Sabine was the woman to finally make him lose his cool. Unfortunately, I’m not keen on H/H conflicts that have anger at their core. Where there is a core of unadulterated anger, I just worry about how things will work out between the H/H in the longer term. And Rydstrom spent a lot of this book being angry at Sabine.
KOADK delivers on the classic Cole recipe and it’s entertaining. To be picky, I didn’t find it quite as pacy or quite as much fun as some of the others. Definitely not the best in the series. However, in fairness, I should acknowledge that this was sixth IAD book I’d read in just a couple of months. And in light of that, reading it was bit like eating a sixth slice of chocolate cheesecake.
I wish I could say that I will stop glomming Ms Cole now. That I will put the two If Yous… and The Price of Pleasure that arrived yesterday to one side and ration myself a bit more.
Are you going to make me give a grade, Jessica? If I must, a B-.
JESSICA’S RIPOSTE:
Tumperkin, I love your KFC Recipe, but, like those annoying Epicurious.com commenters who are so sure they can improve a master chef’s recipe by adding a cup of sugar and some Cheez Whiz, I am going to boldly add a couple of steps:
1.5 Hero, after token resistance to the idea (she’s so obviously wrong for him), realizes heroine is his fated soul mate and commences trying to convince her of this fact for the entire book
2.5 Raunchiness and frequency of sex talk inversely proportional to amount of sex actually being had (earning her the appellation, Master Muffin Tease)
2.5.5 Consummation includes recognition by heroine that hero was right all along about this “fated mate” thing.
This is the 4th in Cole’s Immortals After Dark series that I have read (I skipped the ghost one — you can thank JR Ward for my allergic reaction to THAT plotline), and, like Tumperkin, I have enjoyed them all.
Something unique about Cole is the way she mixes very old school elements with a very 21st century take on gender. In all of the IAD installments, you have a sexually inexperienced heroine paired with a hero whose ability to give orgasms is so powerful he fears he may literally break the heroine in two, and this is no less true in KOADK. But Cole overlays that traditional matchup with something very modern that destabilizes the expected balance of bedroom power: the heroine has the hero chained up in her bed and sexually torments him, while the hero, for all his thousands of conquests, had been celibate for centuries and can only have an orgasm with his One True Mate.
I agree with you completely, Tumperkin, about the way Cole builds sexual tension and only allows her hero and heroine to consummate their relationship once they are in love. This is very Old School. But having them tie each other up and spank each other on the way to the Big O is not in your grandma’s romance novel. Cole’s heroes in particular, can be very graphic, even crude, from page one, about their desires for the heroine, but like gentlemen of yore, they withhold themselves until everything is safe and everyone is emotionally ready (hence, the book’s status for its female readers as a Muffin Tease).
Further, you have the traditional sexy, tiny heroine, and big strapping hero. She’s talky and he’s taciturn. He’s all about honor and principle and she’s Freud’s view of women sprung to life: narcissistic, manipulative, and deceitful. All very Old School. But now reverse it: deep down, he’s lonely and wants a spouse more than anything, he is insecure at not having found his mate, while all his friends are paired up, he’s incapable of orgasm, he’s embarrassed by sexual fantasies that do not become him, and he’s a powerful career person who secretly wants to be dominated in the bedroom. Sounds like a common species of the contemporary heroine, doesn’t it? For her part, Sabine is ruthless and gets what she wants, only wants Rydstrom to advance her career, she pries into his mind to discover his sexual fantasies and uses them to gain power over him, etc. Sounds like a billionaire CEO doesn’t it?
Cole plays around with gender expectations not just in the H/H. relationships but all over the book. One of my favorite examples is the scene when Rydstrom comes home to his mansion in Louisiana and finds the place trashed. Empty kegs, underwear hanging from the chandelier, pornographic magazines laying around. Except instead of beer-soaked Hustler’s, it’s beer-soaked Playgirl magazines: yes, folks, it’s the witches and Valkyries, not the men, who have been partying in the King’s absence.
And this juxtaposition of Playgirl and Lordly Lore reminds me of something else, which is not unique to Cole, but is such a strong feature of the series I wanted to mention it: the mix of 21st century (middle class) American life with ancient/fantasy cultures. Sherrilyn Kenyon, Laurell K. Hamilton, JR Ward also do this sort of thing, of course. I enjoy entering the world of the IAD, mainly because I like the people in it. However, I find that the quick switches in tone and setting (from a bloody death battle to pop culture laced girl gossip between Sabine and her sister Lanthe, for example) detract from my ability to tale any of the “Lore” seriously.
SPOILERS
*
*
*
When I think about KOADK, the moment in the book when Sabine runs away into the Lousiana night and Rydstrom runs after her, and then, back in the mansion, slumps down and realizes he can’t live like this, was much more memorable and powerful than the moment when he decides to give up his kingdom for her.
*
*
*
END SPOILERS
To me, the paranormal and fantasy elements add to the fun, but not as much to the drama.
Tumperkin, you mention that Sabine’s self image doesn’t match what we know of her, and I agree. I note that this type of low self-image is very common among heroes, so I view this as another example of Cole’s gender bending. But, following along with your observation, there is a vast difference between a bitch and a badass, a selfish woman and an evil sorceress, a snarky person and a cruel person. Sabine never really crosses that line, in my opinion. I, too, enjoyed Sabine, unlike some other reviewers who felt she “wasn’t good enough” for the hero: she certainly made me laugh out loud more than once (I loved the scene when she argued that “fighting solves everything”). It was enough of a conflict for me to have morally upstanding hero and a selfish deceitful heroine, so while the Sabine’s self image as “Eeeeeeeebil” didn’t work for me, it’s working also wasn’t necessary for me to get wrapped up in the relationship.
I do wish more time had been spent on their divergent moral views. Did Sabine have a point when she defended cunning, deceit, self-interestedness, and violence as a first resort? To take just one example, it was a very powerful moment in the text when Rydstrom lied to Sabine, but the ramifications of that lie on his character and on their relationship were not given their due.
Like you, Tumperkin, I will absolutely continue reading the IAD, and you may also have convinced me to give a Cole hisoptrical a try.
I leave you with two totally unsupported subjective opinions:
1. I respectfully request that the phrase “feed me into you” when spoken in reference to the hero’s penis be banned from all of romance for ever more. The connotations are ALL WRONG. Shudder.
2. Enough with the horned heroes. There’s a reason none of the heroes on demon romance novel covers are shown with their horns. And that reason is this: horns are gross. (I don’t find rhinos or goats sexy, either, by the way.)
In conclusion, who wins this duel? Clearly, it’s a TKO for Kresley Cole.
Related posts:
- Review: Demon Bound, Meljean Brook Cover comments: What do you think of the trend towards hero only covers? Those are some long arms, and his...
- Review: Death of a Pirate King, by Josh Lanyon My Take in Brief: Confronting my prejudices has never been more enjoyable. Series? Yes. this is the fourth Adrien English...
- Review: She’s Got It Bad, by Sarah Mayberry Heroine and Hero: Liam, former abused orphan bad boy cum multimillionaire custom organ-donor-on-wheels maker. Zoe, former good girl, now a...
- Welcome Aboard Tumperkin! [Warning: This post has nothing to do with the RITAs, the RUTAs or Roto-Rooter.] I’m very happy to announce that...
- Review: Grimspace, Ann Aguirre Cover comment: The heroine’s hair is not what is described in the book, where the unruly mess is almost a...
- The Eeeeevil Mother in Romance You know who I’m talking about. She refers to her daughters or daughters-in-law routinely as “whores”, she refers to their...




#1 by Victoria Janssen on April 16, 2009 - 10:02 am
Also, Kresley Cole’s books are FUNNY. Nix cracks me up practically every time she appears on the page.
#2 by carolyn jean on April 16, 2009 - 11:25 am
This is the best kind of review, because you guys are making me re-enjoy this series.
T sez: “Sabine is the ultimate Cole survivor heroine. She’s been killed heaps of times and clawed her way back from each death.”
Sabine might have been one of my favorite heroines of IAD. While I get the gap you’re talking about, I loved her evil, and I think that gap almost had to be there to make an evil heroine work. I think it’s a way that Cole had her cake and ate it too, maybe a bit of a cheat, but a deft one.
J sez: “Cole’s heroes in particular, can be very graphic, even crude, from page one, about their desires for the heroine, but like gentlemen of yore, they withhold themselves until everything is safe and everyone is emotionally ready (hence, the book’s status for its female readers as a Muffin Tease).”
What? Muffin Tease? Did you just make that up? You are so silly but you make a good point. I love the way they pace out sexually. And Jessica, you didn’t read the ghost one? YOU HAVE TO! It’s so good.
You can’t skip the ghost one! I personally will come and haunt you.
Cripes, I have to get on those historicals.
#3 by Jessica on April 16, 2009 - 11:45 am
Victoria Janssen wrote:
I agree. Anyone know if Nix is getting her own book?
carolyn jean wrote:
Of course! Co*k tease doesn’t work given the female readership.
carolyn jean wrote:
Really? Oh heck. Ok, I’ll read it.
#4 by carolyn jean on April 16, 2009 - 1:05 pm
I have never heard of it called a muffin. In what way does it look like a muffin? Unless you are meaning the area that is under a muffin top. Oh, maybe best not answer all that.
#5 by Jessica on April 16, 2009 - 1:49 pm
carolyn jean wrote:
I have never heard it used in RL but…
According to the Urban Dictionary http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=muffin
and they have entries for “blueberry” (diseased) and “buttered” (you don’t want to know) muffins, too.
And Muffy’s World of Vagina Euphemisims
http://www.starma.com/penis/muffy/muffy.html
#6 by Tumperkin on April 16, 2009 - 2:38 pm
Gosh – it is long isn’t it! (I speak of the post, natch)
Victoria – I adore Nix too. I have this happy fantasy that she will get her own book and her bloke is going to be that vampire king chap.
CJ – srsly? You didn’t know that muffin was a euph for vagina? But LB used it in the epilogue of TUTGBBMCSMB!
Jessica – I like your gender bending theory and agree that the books do have a an old school, quite traditional core. It strikes me that KC has quite a smart approach that maximises appeal to a wide range of readers.
CJ is right – you should read the Conrad/Naomi book. For me, Naomi is the most different of the IAD heroines and not actually because she’s a ghost. She had quite a colourful history as a human and is probably the sexually most experienced of her heroines. Also she EATS! I remember reading one passage when Naomi becomes corporeal and longs for a buttery croissant. This was very refreshing after reading several KC books in which the heroines did not eat or barely ate:-
Vampires don’t need to eat (Emma’s book)
Valkyries don’t eat (Kaderin and Holly’s books)
I don’t remember Mariketa eating much (Mariketa’s book)
Ghosts don’t – till the croissant thing – (Naomi’s book)
And now Sabine? She seemed to have vegetarian diet but it didn’t seem to involve much in the way of actual eating….
It’s actually quite fascinating the various ways in which KC’s heroines reflect our present (or certainly recent) culture:-
- thin is in
- money is worshipped
- sexuality is enjoyed and guilt-free
- feelings are expressed not suppressed
Interesting. Particularly the last three which are all quite at odds with the traditional romance heroine.
#7 by Nicola O. on April 16, 2009 - 8:08 pm
Great post! All of Cole’s heroines strike me as just a little bit skewed sideways to regular romance or UF norms, and I really like how this analysis pinpoints so much of why it feels that way.
Jessica: I liked Neomi’s story the least. It’s possible that I too just couldn’t cope after Jane.
CJ: you need to listen to more Aerosmith, obviously.
I have some KC reviews up at Alpha Heroes– the MacCarrick brothers and the IAD up through Cade’s book. Haven’t got around to posting a review of Kiss… (yeah, I’m a little behind…)
#8 by Eric Selinger on April 16, 2009 - 8:13 pm
Muffin? Cf. Aerosmith, “Walk This Way.” It’s been around for a while.
“A hero whose ability to give orgasms is so powerful he fears he may literally break the heroine in two.” Damn. This I have to read, although heroines who don’t eat don’t sound very fun to me. (I’m more a Minerva Dobbs kind of guy.)
Thanks for putting these on my TBR list!
#9 by Kaetrin on April 16, 2009 - 11:38 pm
I really enjoyed the Neomi book. She’s a ghost from almost the beginning and it has a PROPER happy ending so it’s not really like Jane’s story which also scarred me for life. In other words, I second Carolyn Jean’s recommendation for you to read this book Jessica.
I’ve read all the other IAD books and I have KOADK but I haven’t read it yet. I agree with Tumperkin about the cheesecake reference – too much at once and it is not as enjoyable.
I may check out the historicals now too….
thx for the review!
#10 by willaful on April 16, 2009 - 11:48 pm
“I like romance novels in which the heroine really suffers. The worse it gets for them, the better I like it (gosh I sound awful, don’t I?). And (this confession gets worse) I have a particular weakness for books in which the hero is partly culpable for the suffering. ”
Me too. Since I’m happily married and not particularly masochistic, I’ve given up worrying about it.
#11 by Jessica on April 17, 2009 - 5:44 am
Eric Selinger wrote:
Eric, I see your Aerosmith and raise you one generation: Captain Beefheart’s Muffin Man!
#12 by Jennifer B on April 17, 2009 - 8:52 am
By far, the BEST review I’ve read in a long time!!!! Insightful and entertaining–specially to one who also glommed Cole right up until the last release. F’ing fab review, thanks Ladies!
#13 by RfP on April 17, 2009 - 10:38 am
It’s also common among heroines, right? The genre abounds with heroines who don’t know their own worth. Unless you mean the specific “I’m eeeebil” spin; that’s less common in romance, though somewhat common in paranormal, I think. (Having skillz makes a woman eebil, natch.)
I seem to be in the minority, but to me these books seem really problematic in their gender statements. In the two I read, I thought the male roles *were* turned inside out to some extent, but the female roles followed the manipulative, shallow stereotype of the Old School villainess. I can see that perhaps it’s unexpected to give that character a happy ending, but it still grates.
#14 by Eric Selinger on April 17, 2009 - 1:07 pm
Jessica wrote: “Eric, I see your Aerosmith and raise you one generation: Captain Beefheart’s Muffin Man!”
Oh, no! If I start giggling every time I hear “Do You Know the Muffin Man?” I’ll know who to blame.
(Getting a little smirky about “Drury Lane” now, too.)
#15 by Jessica on April 17, 2009 - 1:18 pm
RfP
I am trying to think back, because my recollection is very different of the other books.
I want to clarify that I DO think there is a very traditional core to these romances, but I think wrapped around it is a layer of tweaking of gender roles. I think that’s why they appeal so widely, as Tumperkin suggests.
#16 by Janine on April 17, 2009 - 10:09 pm
I wonder if I should give this author another try. The one I read (A Hunger Like No Other) seemed over the top to me, without as much grounding in reality as I like in paranormals. But I could say the same thing of J.R. Ward’s books, which I’ve been known to enjoy. I’m not sure why I didn’t find the world in AHLNO as convincing, but I think it might have to do with the wide variety of paranormal beings that peopled it.
#17 by Jessica on April 18, 2009 - 5:42 am
RfP wrote:
I agree, but I see a difference between a heroine not knowing her own worth, and “I am not good enough for you” as a reason for conflict between the h/h.
In fact, now that I think about it, that it true of Sabine too. So, I don’t retract my assertion that it is more common among heroes, but I retract my assertion that Sabine does it.
Can you give me some examples of the low self-esteem of heroines creating conflict? It would help jog my memory.
Janine wrote:
Janine,
First, I think the world building was weakest in the first book. My recollection is that most of it took place in a hotel room or mansion.
But second, there is an “everything but the kitchen sink” feel to these books. When you add the mixed lores to the pop culture language and references … Sometimes it creates a fun, zany environment, and sometimes it doesn’t work as well.
#18 by Tumperkin on April 19, 2009 - 3:13 pm
Janine – I agree with RfP that AHLNO was less strong in world building terms. My favourite was book 3 – Wicked Deeds on a Winter’s Night.
RfP – Otherwise, I think I disagree. I don’t really see these heroines as being the shallow villainesses of old made into heroines. I think they are all at heart quite loveable. E.g. their materialism is made fun of and is in a sense beyond their control (the valkyries are powerless against their own fascination for diamonds). For me, Sabine showed that KC wasn’t really willing to eat into their basic cuddliness and give them truly unattractive qualities.
I think I also disagree on the self-esteem thing. I find KC’s heroines have a strong sense of themselves. For me, Sabine’s VIEW of herself was skewed but this error wasn’t based on a self esteem lack. Certainly compared to other romances where heroines are portrayed as having major esteem issues (HQs are particularly guilty of this).
#19 by Jessica on April 19, 2009 - 5:16 pm
Tumperkin wrote:
I totally agree.
#20 by RfP on April 20, 2009 - 9:31 am
I can understand reading it that way. But to me, it’s similar to the manymany chick lit novels that make fun of the heroine (a heroine who’s often helplessly materialistic).
I love that so many (most?) romances can be read either as perpetuating or as inverting stereotypes. Laura Vivanco described that conundrum really well on Teach Me Tonight a couple of years ago, though I can’t find the post right now. Anyway, it makes perfect sense that, f’rex, one reader might see a female character as obsessed with appearances, where another reader sees her as not apologizing for being feminine, or as ultimately triumphing whether or not she conforms to societal expectations.
There I agree. Unless being evil is necessarily about lack of self esteem. I don’t think it is, LOL.
#21 by Janine on April 20, 2009 - 8:18 pm
I think you’ve put your finger on what kept me from falling in love with AHLNO. The “everything but the kitchen sink” feel kept me from being able to suspend disbelief and buy into the world and the story. And the zaniness seemed over the top to me.