<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Practice Makes Perfect, Julie James (with discussion about feminists and gender politics in romance)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/</link>
	<description>Rethinking romance and other fine fiction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:16:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Practice Makes Perfect, by Julie James &#171; Lusty Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-3351</link>
		<dc:creator>Practice Makes Perfect, by Julie James &#171; Lusty Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-3351</guid>
		<description>[...] many other great reviews of Practice Makes Perfect have been written, so I&#8217;m not going to go into a lot of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: silver">
<p>[...] many other great reviews of Practice Makes Perfect have been written, so I&#8217;m not going to go into a lot of [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmm&#8230; do I smell discrimination? &#171; The Julie James Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-2413</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmm&#8230; do I smell discrimination? &#171; The Julie James Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-2413</guid>
		<description>[...] the gender issues touched on in the book (many of which were articulated so well by Jessica in her review of PMP at Racy Romance Reviews); our personal experiences working in male-dominated professions; whether [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: silver">
<p>[...] the gender issues touched on in the book (many of which were articulated so well by Jessica in her review of PMP at Racy Romance Reviews); our personal experiences working in male-dominated professions; whether [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: REVIEW: Practice Makes Perfect by Julie James : The Good, The Bad and The Unread</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>REVIEW: Practice Makes Perfect by Julie James : The Good, The Bad and The Unread</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>[...] heroine&quot; usually fills me with an unnameable dread. But after reading Jessica&#039;s take on the gender politics and feminism in the book I decided I should read it myself since her review was very positive and I figured that if she [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: silver">
<p>[...] heroine&#8221; usually fills me with an unnameable dread. But after reading Jessica&#8217;s take on the gender politics and feminism in the book I decided I should read it myself since her review was very positive and I figured that if she [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-1843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-1843</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ willaful&lt;/b&gt;:
I&#039;m so glad you read it! I agree that they were much more similar than different -- Payton&#039;s mistrust of wealth and her mild critiques of the economy seemed more like hand waving to her mother&#039;s ideology than her own true feelings.



&lt;b&gt;Tumperkin&lt;/b&gt; wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I realise though that many women are very far from being as fortunate as me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Amen to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@ willaful</b>:<br />
I&#8217;m so glad you read it! I agree that they were much more similar than different &#8212; Payton&#8217;s mistrust of wealth and her mild critiques of the economy seemed more like hand waving to her mother&#8217;s ideology than her own true feelings.</p>
<p><b>Tumperkin</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>I realise though that many women are very far from being as fortunate as me.</p></blockquote>
<p>Amen to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willaful</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>willaful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>I bopped back in to reread this, having just finished the book. Your points are excellent; I was particularly struck by Payton&#039;s lack of response to the no-women allowed golf club. In a way it seemed that the feminism she was portrayed as espousing only came out when responding to theoretical issues. 

I was going to comment that I wondered about the future of a relationship between two such different people, but the more I thought about it, the less they really seemed different to me.

I did enjoy the book, and luckily for me, am quite fond of romantic suspense. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bopped back in to reread this, having just finished the book. Your points are excellent; I was particularly struck by Payton&#8217;s lack of response to the no-women allowed golf club. In a way it seemed that the feminism she was portrayed as espousing only came out when responding to theoretical issues. </p>
<p>I was going to comment that I wondered about the future of a relationship between two such different people, but the more I thought about it, the less they really seemed different to me.</p>
<p>I did enjoy the book, and luckily for me, am quite fond of romantic suspense. <img src='http://www.readreactreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tumperkin</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>Tumperkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>Jessica - I agree with all that you say and yet - and yet when you say &#039;I lament that anyone...has to make this choice&#039;, I have to say that there is another side to that coin.  Which is the opportunity of that choice.  All in all, do I resent my situation?  Do I feel I&#039;ve had to make a choice I didn&#039;t want?  *Frowns* I don&#039;t know that I do.  I mean, part of this whole thing is this thing of Success and what we are all conditioned to think that is.  Do I feel unfortunate and passed over?  Well, at times at do.  At others, I feel extraordinarily fortunate.  I was able to take 9 months maternity leave for my first child and 11 months for my second child.  Not all paid, but my job was waiting for me when I got back.  And despite working in a difficult and notoriously inflexible profession, I have been able to negotiate some flexibility in my life.  My male counterparts get one week&#039;s paternity leave and I do not think they would so easily be granted any flexibility in their working (regardless of their legal rights).  

I&#039;m no apologist for The Way Things Are but equally, I think it&#039;s important to be honest.  I realise though that many women are very far from being as fortunate as me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jessica &#8211; I agree with all that you say and yet &#8211; and yet when you say &#8216;I lament that anyone&#8230;has to make this choice&#8217;, I have to say that there is another side to that coin.  Which is the opportunity of that choice.  All in all, do I resent my situation?  Do I feel I&#8217;ve had to make a choice I didn&#8217;t want?  *Frowns* I don&#8217;t know that I do.  I mean, part of this whole thing is this thing of Success and what we are all conditioned to think that is.  Do I feel unfortunate and passed over?  Well, at times at do.  At others, I feel extraordinarily fortunate.  I was able to take 9 months maternity leave for my first child and 11 months for my second child.  Not all paid, but my job was waiting for me when I got back.  And despite working in a difficult and notoriously inflexible profession, I have been able to negotiate some flexibility in my life.  My male counterparts get one week&#8217;s paternity leave and I do not think they would so easily be granted any flexibility in their working (regardless of their legal rights).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m no apologist for The Way Things Are but equally, I think it&#8217;s important to be honest.  I realise though that many women are very far from being as fortunate as me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ Tumperkin&lt;/b&gt;:
Thanks so much for the reply. It&#039;s so interesting to hear what women in Payton&#039;s situation have chosen. Two of my college roomies are lawyers. One has two children, one has no children. One is not a partner (although her husband is), and the other just sent me a photo George Stephanopolous (ABC News Washignton correspondent and former advisor to President Clinton) giving her a leadership award. 

Guess which one is the mother?

When I was in grad school, I had three women faculty out of 25. All were married, non were mothers. The message was very clear: you are going to have to choose. Thankfully I didn&#039;t, but the ranks of my female cohort who had to give up academia to be the kind of parents they wanted to be are very full.

You make a great point about the glass ceiling not being something simply externally imposed. And I would never say that someone&#039;s desire to have children and mother in a way that she feels is appropriate is the result of evil patriarchal conditioning. I do lament the fact that anyone -- women or men -- have to make this choice, I lament the fact that working class and poor women often do not have the luxury of making it, and also that more men don&#039;t make it, and also that the work of parenting itself is not valued in our culture the way, say, legal work is, such that when women like you make the choices you do, you are not made economically vulnerable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@ Tumperkin</b>:<br />
Thanks so much for the reply. It&#8217;s so interesting to hear what women in Payton&#8217;s situation have chosen. Two of my college roomies are lawyers. One has two children, one has no children. One is not a partner (although her husband is), and the other just sent me a photo George Stephanopolous (ABC News Washignton correspondent and former advisor to President Clinton) giving her a leadership award. </p>
<p>Guess which one is the mother?</p>
<p>When I was in grad school, I had three women faculty out of 25. All were married, non were mothers. The message was very clear: you are going to have to choose. Thankfully I didn&#8217;t, but the ranks of my female cohort who had to give up academia to be the kind of parents they wanted to be are very full.</p>
<p>You make a great point about the glass ceiling not being something simply externally imposed. And I would never say that someone&#8217;s desire to have children and mother in a way that she feels is appropriate is the result of evil patriarchal conditioning. I do lament the fact that anyone &#8212; women or men &#8212; have to make this choice, I lament the fact that working class and poor women often do not have the luxury of making it, and also that more men don&#8217;t make it, and also that the work of parenting itself is not valued in our culture the way, say, legal work is, such that when women like you make the choices you do, you are not made economically vulnerable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tumperkin</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Tumperkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>Well goodness!  This review just speaks to me about so many things!  Naturally enough.  I&#039;m a lawyer myself who has abandoned any hope of partnership in the firm I work in so that I can be the kind of parent I want to be (whilst still working). I can relate to many of the scenes and issues that you mention in this review but I&#039;ll restrict myself to a few comments.

1. I am a feminist but this is not an easy thing, this issue of equal treatment in the workplace.  For me personally, the notion of the glass ceiling is overly simplistic.  The day I became pregnant, my career ambitions began to wane.  That happened to me.  I am part of my own glass ceiling - and yes I recognise that part of that is gender conditioning and all that - but still. I&#039;m incredibly invested in what I do, but I&#039;m not prepared to work all the hours and I come in late in the morning after the school run and work 4 out of 5 days.  Do I seriously expect the management of my firm to select for partnership someone who isn&#039;t prepared to invest as much time and commitment in the role as another (male) person?  No.  (Incidentally, my husband also works 4 days out of 5 and so I have at least the comfort of equality at home!)

2. It&#039;s interesting that you bring up the role of a female litigator in a gender driven case. I have experience of a case (a commercial case but it involved the sex industry) in which we thought long and hard about what gender and personality the advocate of the case should be.  I think we called it wrong.  Me - I don&#039;t have any issue with any case I&#039;m asked to present provided that it is within the legal and ethical boundaries of my profession.  My job is to be my client&#039;s agent and there is a mind-shift involved in taking on that role.  Personal feelings have to be put aside and I&#039;ve never found that difficult.  That said, I&#039;ve never been in a position of being asked to pursue or defend something I have a major issue with. 

3. Yes, JD is very typical - by the sound of him - of so many men of the profession.  But whereas (at least in my corner of the world) 20 years ago, men like that could almost expect to be made a partner, now a much smaller fraction of them will be.  That sort of easy privilege has and is being chipped away at (though not really, in my view, because of women in the workplace - more because of commercial considerations and a massive increase in the numbers entering the profession). I know many male lawyers who feel embattled and I see that that&#039;s hard for someone in that position (whilst giving no quarter about why it&#039;s hard(er?) for me).  In my position, a man may well feel like a failure.  But I can treat myself as a success because I&#039;ve exercised a choice not to reach for that.  

I could write so much more but I&#039;ll content myself with saying that you&#039;ve probably persuaded me to pick up a book I normally would never read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well goodness!  This review just speaks to me about so many things!  Naturally enough.  I&#8217;m a lawyer myself who has abandoned any hope of partnership in the firm I work in so that I can be the kind of parent I want to be (whilst still working). I can relate to many of the scenes and issues that you mention in this review but I&#8217;ll restrict myself to a few comments.</p>
<p>1. I am a feminist but this is not an easy thing, this issue of equal treatment in the workplace.  For me personally, the notion of the glass ceiling is overly simplistic.  The day I became pregnant, my career ambitions began to wane.  That happened to me.  I am part of my own glass ceiling &#8211; and yes I recognise that part of that is gender conditioning and all that &#8211; but still. I&#8217;m incredibly invested in what I do, but I&#8217;m not prepared to work all the hours and I come in late in the morning after the school run and work 4 out of 5 days.  Do I seriously expect the management of my firm to select for partnership someone who isn&#8217;t prepared to invest as much time and commitment in the role as another (male) person?  No.  (Incidentally, my husband also works 4 days out of 5 and so I have at least the comfort of equality at home!)</p>
<p>2. It&#8217;s interesting that you bring up the role of a female litigator in a gender driven case. I have experience of a case (a commercial case but it involved the sex industry) in which we thought long and hard about what gender and personality the advocate of the case should be.  I think we called it wrong.  Me &#8211; I don&#8217;t have any issue with any case I&#8217;m asked to present provided that it is within the legal and ethical boundaries of my profession.  My job is to be my client&#8217;s agent and there is a mind-shift involved in taking on that role.  Personal feelings have to be put aside and I&#8217;ve never found that difficult.  That said, I&#8217;ve never been in a position of being asked to pursue or defend something I have a major issue with. </p>
<p>3. Yes, JD is very typical &#8211; by the sound of him &#8211; of so many men of the profession.  But whereas (at least in my corner of the world) 20 years ago, men like that could almost expect to be made a partner, now a much smaller fraction of them will be.  That sort of easy privilege has and is being chipped away at (though not really, in my view, because of women in the workplace &#8211; more because of commercial considerations and a massive increase in the numbers entering the profession). I know many male lawyers who feel embattled and I see that that&#8217;s hard for someone in that position (whilst giving no quarter about why it&#8217;s hard(er?) for me).  In my position, a man may well feel like a failure.  But I can treat myself as a success because I&#8217;ve exercised a choice not to reach for that.  </p>
<p>I could write so much more but I&#8217;ll content myself with saying that you&#8217;ve probably persuaded me to pick up a book I normally would never read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;KristieJ&lt;/b&gt; wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Wow - fascinating review and fascinating discussions.  this book isn’t on the shelves here but I had already made up my mind (after reading JTSMA) that I was going to read this one too.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, I don&#039;t have the power of The Kristie (a la Broken Wing) but I&#039;m happy to do my part to share my enjoyment of this book! You will really like it, esp if you enjoyed her first.

&lt;b&gt;@ carolyn jean&lt;/b&gt;:  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>KristieJ</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Wow &#8211; fascinating review and fascinating discussions.  this book isn’t on the shelves here but I had already made up my mind (after reading JTSMA) that I was going to read this one too.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I don&#8217;t have the power of The Kristie (a la Broken Wing) but I&#8217;m happy to do my part to share my enjoyment of this book! You will really like it, esp if you enjoyed her first.</p>
<p><b>@ carolyn jean</b>:  <img src='http://www.readreactreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carolyn jean</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2009/03/12/review-practice-makes-perfect-julie-james-with-discussion-about-feminists-and-gender-politics-in-romance/#comment-1811</link>
		<dc:creator>carolyn jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racyromancereviews.com/?p=2271#comment-1811</guid>
		<description>Well, isn&#039;t this great!  You really get it going!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, isn&#8217;t this great!  You really get it going!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
