My Take in Brief: Confronting my prejudices has never been more enjoyable.
Series? Yes. this is the fourth Adrien English mystery. It was the first I read, and while the mystery stands alone, the romance/s began in a previous book. If I had a do-over, I would not read this first.
Heroes: Adrien English is the owner of an independent L.A. book store and a mystery writer who tends to get involved, Miss Marple style, in solving real life mysteries. He has a chronic heart condition, not just medically but also emotionally, thanks to his troubled relationships with his current partner, tweedy professor Guy, and the ex who broke his heart, tough, closeted and married cop, Jake.
Plot: In the opening pages, the man who is financing a film version of one of Adrien’s books is poisoned. When Adrien gets involved in solving the case, he reenters Jake’s orbit, creating concerns and jealousy on the part of his wary partner, Guy.
Fun factoid: Lanyon fans are sometimes called “fanyons”, although not all of them like it, and Lanyon was a guest blogger recently at Jessewave.
Word on the Web:
Book Utopia, 44 out of 50
Reviewing the Evidence, positive
Jessewave, positive
Teddypig, positive
Amazon.com, 5 stars after 20 reviews
The Racy Romance Review:
I got the idea that this was erotic romance, maybe because the print publisher, ManLoveRomance refers to itself as a publisher of Gay Erotic Fiction. But there was no sex until page 155 in a 234 page book, and only one brief and pretty nonexplicit sex scene after that (switch the gender and it could have been in a historical romance). This book made me ask myself what counts as erotica: Is it based on amount and/or explicitness of the sex? Is any romance between two men, regardless of level of explicitness, considered erotica? Or does it depend not in the text but on the organizational context: i.e. the publishers themselves are erotica publishers? I have no idea, but either way, this is not a good choice if you are looking for lots of explicit sex.
I decided I wanted to read some m/m romance, and erotica is what seems to be most readily available. Is there a nonexplicit subgenre of romance between men? Again, more questions raised for me than answered.
This book worked well for me as both a mystery and a romance. One of my gripes about contemporary romance is that they could be set anywhere. They give me the feeling I get when I enter any big box store: total disconnection from recognizable human life. Not so in Pirate King, which is set in a very recognizable L.A.. The fringe Hollywood scene is one I have rarely encountered in contemporary romance, and it was like a breath of fresh air.
Pirate King was very heavy on dialogue and action, and since it was written in the first person point of view of Adrien, who is not particularly observant of non-human features of his environment, we did not get a ton of environmental detail. Still Lanyon manages to convey a lot about the feeling of a place with a few words. Here’s one example:
We talked a little more, I finished my lemonade, and then I left her lush suburban paradise with the lawn birds and pool generator filling the silence.
And another:
I drank my juice and stared down at the empty street. It was a warm, dry June evening. The summer night smelled of fog and distant dinners cooked in restaurants on the o side of town. A kid with a guitar sat on the stoop of the closed boutique across the street singing — practicing apparently — an old Beatles song. The bald and featureless mannequins in the brightly illuminated boutique windows modeled their finery and gestured elegantly into space.
The characterization of Adrien was very interesting to me. I felt like I got to know him mainly through the reactions he reported from the people around him. He did do some reflection, but his internal monologues were often cut short. Is that a guy thing? For example, in a subplot, Adrien’s boyfriend, Guy, is defending his continued acquaintance with an ex-lover who has fallen on hard times. Here’s Adrien’s response:
I had this sudden Ebenezer Scrooge moment. Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses? Maybe Lisa was right. Maybe I had grown hard, bitter. In any case, I seemed fresh out of the milk of human kindness.
This is another sense in which reading this book first was not the best idea: so many times Adrien’s present self is compared unfavorably with his past self. To me, he seemed a bit aimless, unconnected, mopey — not his best. His heart condition helped generate sympathy in me for him, and added a nice dimension of tension and risk to his increasingly dangerous investigation. I did develop a sense of wanting to protect Adrien. I believe that I would have been more invested in his character if I had read the other books.
I thought the mystery was quite compelling, if straightforward in an old fashioned way (no CSI stuff here). The suspects Adrien interviews were all interesting and believably potentially guilty. You do have to bracket the implausibility of the idea that wealthy people whose reputation and life are on the line would willingly talk, without legal counsel, to this random book seller about their involvement with a murder. I never watched Miss Marple, but I am guessing it’s kind of like the suspension of disbelief required to believe she could be intimately involved in so many murder investigations.
The best scenes for me were Adrien’s scenes with Jake. Lanyon does an amazing job of creating sexual tension, and of having it pay off. The intimate scenes were hot, romantic, tender, and really a joy to read.
Now, on to the prejudices and/or stereotypes that reading this made me realize I still harbored, on some level, about gay men. I’m not proud of any of this, but I want to be honest here:
1. There was one question I had, which I probably can’t answer without reading the other books: It’s clear that several factors contributed to the ending of Jake and Adrien’s affair. One of them was Jake’s participation in BDSM activities with other lovers. My question is whether Adrien objected to the BDSM itself, or objected to sharing Jake, or both. Reading Pirate King, I picked up several times on the sense that BDSM, for Adrien, was inherently immoral. [Teddypig discusses this in a review of a prior Adrien English mystery.] Now, the stereotype I have to admit to was that I found myself thinking “Why would Adrien be bothered by BDSM?” and I’m pretty sure I would not have asked that question that if Adrien was a heterosexual man. In other words, I realized at some point in reading Pirate King that I assumed, on some level, that if you’re gay, you’re more open to other kinds of non-majority sexual practices.
2. Adrien is basically celibate for a large part of the book. At one point, he and Guy just cuddle in their bed. I definitely had a moment when I caught myself feeling surprised about that. Again, ridiculous, and based on some stereotype about the sex drive of gay men.
3. Jake’s internal conflict is that he is closeted and married. As a cop, he fears that homophobia will cost him a career which means everything to him. We don’t learn much about his relationship with his wife in this book, but she had been pregnant in a prior book, so they are definitely sexually active. I have had a certain way of looking at closeted married men, mainly from the point of view of the women in those marriages, and it has not been with much sympathy. My view has been that such men want to enjoy all the benefits of heterosexual male privilege and yet secretly enjoy the companionship and love of other gay men. Articles like this one, “When the Beard is Too Painful to Remove” in the New York Times (2006), or “Married Man Seeks Same for Discreet Play in NY Mag (2007), have confirmed my uncharitable view. Reading Pirate King generated a lot of sympathy in me for Jake, who was hands down the most compelling character in this book. I saw clearly how complicated it all was for him, and how much he had to lose. I had to ask myself why it is so easy for me to defend female victims of domestic violence or female (often pregnant) drug abusers despite their unwise choices, but I had been so hard on these men.
In all three cases, if you walked in to my living room or office and asked me point blank if I believed that gay men are more sexually adventurous than heterosexual men, or that gay men are always horny, or that closeted gay married men do not deserve understanding and support, I would have told you — truthfully – that I do not believe those things. But prejudice and stereotypes do not often live at the level of conscious awareness, which is one reason they are so hard to identify and root out. They nest in crystallized images, in fragments of thoughts, in the echo of memories, in emotional footprints, in the irrational and secret places in our minds.
One of the reasons I think fiction is so important in ethics is that it goes places that rational discourse cannot reach. Fiction speaks to us on so many levels, drawing on all of our cognitive resources, our imagination, our creativity, our emotions, and those unconscious places where we do not even know our true selves, or where our many slivers of self are at war with each other.
Despite the heaviness of my last few comments, I really enjoyed this one, and can say that Death of a Pirate King had me by the ovaries on line one, and did not let me go until the very end. I hope to read more from Josh Lanyon.
Related posts:
- Review: Death Angel, Linda Howard Cover Comment: It’s perfect! Setting: Present day USA, both New York City and more rural parts of the US. Series?:...
- Naked In Death, The Worst Romance Ever Written NOTE: This is a “joke” review, meant as a parody of Amazon reviews. By Guest Reviewer, Ms. Emma Zon I...
- Review: Demon Bound, Meljean Brook Cover comments: What do you think of the trend towards hero only covers? Those are some long arms, and his...
- Review: The Duchess, Her Maid, The Groom, and Their Lover, by Victoria Janssen Cover comment: Like most Harlequin Spice covers, I love this one. Except for the fact that Duchess Camille looks younger...
- Review: My Lord Footman, by Claire Thornton My Take in Brief: I am so sorry this is a category romance that has the typical lifespan of a...
- Review: Immortal Warrior, Lisa Hendrix Cover Comment: Ok, this males only thing is no longer a trend. It’s a takeover. Series?: Yes. This is Book...





#1 by JenB on February 2, 2009 - 10:28 pm
Unfortunately, yes–nearly all books with male-on-male relationships these days are labeled “erotic”. It doesn’t matter if the protags share nothing more than a few kisses. They are gay, which “might be offensive to some readers”.
I’m not a fan of the author’s writing style (or mysteries in general…and believe me, I’ve tried), but the books and the author certainly have quite the loyal following.
Most stereotypes are based on reality to some extent, but there are always exceptions. I know lots of horny, promiscuous gay men…but I also know lots of settled couples and conservative, quiet singles. There are as many types of gay men as there are types of straight men. The romance genre as a rule isn’t very good at portraying the entire spectrum. Even in het romance we tend to see more of the alphas with sexual superpowers. Readers apparently don’t find happily settled couples interesting.
Great review.
#2 by Wave on February 3, 2009 - 3:36 am
I read DOAPK oh so long ago and I really, really enjoyed it for many reasons. I LOVE mysteries and murder/mysteries best of all. I never read any of Josh’s books for the sex b/c, as he said when I interviewed him, 2 sex scenes are about par for his books and these are never explcit.
What I love about this author is that he creates an environment for his characters and I think his world building is some of the best especially in his action adventure books like Dangerous Ground. If I can recall, I think the reason Adrien and Jake ended their affair was because Jake got married in the middle of their affair – she was pregnant- and he wanted to give the marriage a chance because he really wanted a child and the white picket fence. Jake never accepted that he was gay and I believe that whole scenario played out in The Hell You Say which left a bad taste in the mouths of the fans, but in my view was the only way it could have ended, except for one very bad scene. I really think that to enjoy this series you have to read the books in order – only then will you have a true understanding of the characters.
Josh’s books never rise to the eroticism of many authors because his focus is always on the mysteries. The book before this one “The Hell You Say” caused untold furor and grief among the fanyons, with fans of the series calling for Jake’s head for what he did to Adrien. Jake the anti hero, is my favourite character in this series and while not a fanyon, I am a fan of the series.
On your other comment about married gay men –
My view has been that such men want to enjoy all the benefits of heterosexual male privilege and yet secretly enjoy the companionship and love of other gay men.
I recently posted a review of a very short book called Through the Closet Door by Rick R. Reed – here’s the link http://tinyurl.com/crwbku. I think it’s somewhat autobiographical and gives the reader a glimpse of what the “closeted” life is really like – not fun!
Well I had better go but it was nice to visit your blog.
#3 by Laura Vivanco on February 3, 2009 - 4:52 am
“Most stereotypes are based on reality to some extent”
It’s kind of tricky, though, when there are conflicting stereotypes. I’m a medievalist, and in the Middle Ages it was thought that women were sexually voracious, and that having sex benefitted women physically, but drained men. The Victorians, obviously, had rather different views.
Stereotypes reflect cultural attitudes, and there are some really, really horrible stereotypes out there (e.g. this one) which don’t reflect reality at all. As I mentioned in the last thread
there is quite a long tradition of sexual stereotyping of groups considered to be “Other.” I’m thinking of the stereotype of the exotic, sexualised Arab potentate with his penchant for keeping a vast harem of scantily clad harem-girls, the sexual stereotypes about black women and black men, and working-class women were also thought of as more coarse and sexual.
#4 by Jessica on February 3, 2009 - 6:41 am
JenB wrote:
Yes, I was thinking about this last night…maybe the lack of sexual interest between Adrien and Guy seemed strange to me for a minute not ONLY because of latent stereotypical assumptions on my part, but also because, reading romance, I have been conditioned never to see the “hero”, het or not, in bed with a partner and not interested in sex.
Wave wrote:
I will check it out. I absolutely do not think being closeted is fun, but yes, on some level I think I have made unfairly harsh judgments of some married gay men. I am not defending myself on that score. It’s an unfair judgment I need to uproot on every level.
#5 by Laura Vivanco on February 3, 2009 - 7:29 am
“I think I have made unfairly harsh judgments of some married gay men”
From the sound of it, though, in this novel the married man is having an affair. Although I can feel sympathetic towards someone who’s in the closet and gets married primarily because “he really wanted a child and the white picket fence,” that’s never going to be very fair to the wife if she entered into the relationship with the impression that she was physically desired by her husband-to-be. And (regardless of whether one is male or female) it’s not fair to have affairs one’s partner/spouse doesn’t know about and hasn’t consented to you having. I say it’s “not fair” because of both the emotional consequences (e.g. loss of trust, feelings of betrayal) and the risk that a person who’s having an affair could contract a STI and pass it on to their spouse.
“I have been conditioned never to see the “hero”, het or not, in bed with a partner and not interested in sex.”
That’s the “male sexual drive discourse” manifesting its insidious power! You touched on that in an earlier post here about the hero as a “runaway train” and I quoted one article which stated that
Zilbergeld (1978) identified the following themes: sex is a male performance; the man is responsible for orchestrating sex; a man always wants and is always ready to have sex; for a man, all physical contact must lead to sex.
I think this kind of thing is very common in the romance genre, and it’s a fantasy/stereotype about male sexuality. Like other stereotypes, I think it reflects cultural attitudes.
#6 by Sarah Frantz on February 3, 2009 - 10:01 am
I think I love you, you know that! LOVE this post. Thank you for your honesty.
I can recommend some particularly brilliant m/m romances (most of which, yes, have a lot of sex, but that’s not the point of the story). If you want!
#7 by carolyn jean on February 3, 2009 - 11:21 am
I, too, am in love with you for this post. Your penultimate para on fiction’s place in ethics is just wonderful – even as a longtime reader and an aspiring novelist, I’d never really framed it in those terms, that fiction goes places rational discourse can’t reach. As a writer, I’m always just thinking my goal is entertainment, and I think that’s as it should be – but an honest portrayal of some slice of the human condition is always priceless to me as a human and a reader. Of course romance does that – not, like, wholesale, but I appreciate when a kind of honesty in romance shines a light on important things. And I appreciate your honesty in reflecting on it for this book, which I loved.
Hot dawg! You are taking us on an intellectual journey!
Anyway, hey, so remember you were a bit reticent about reading James Lear’s Palace of Varieties? You should try it. And, have you ever read Balzac’s Lost Illusions? I have, and knowing that book made reading POV just so delightful! The central romance arc could’ve been stronger, but whoa, what a wonderful book. Smutty, yes, but in the most lighthearted and delightful way.
#8 by Tumperkin on February 3, 2009 - 4:45 pm
What CJ said. The ethics thing and the James Lear recc.
I’ve only read one Lanyon novella (not an Adrien English book). It was good. I’ve been meaning to read more for a while now.
#9 by Margie on February 3, 2009 - 6:57 pm
I just recently read “Whistling in the Dark” by Tamara Allen which is m/m, but definitely not erotica. It was a really great romance. It takes place at the turn of the century in New York which is such a different and interesting setting. The author does a really good job of making the reader feel the time/place. Plus, I loved both the heroes.
It is a scientific fact that in general, gay man-couples have sex more than heterosexual couples, and both groups have sex more than lesbian couples. However, I think this fact gets distorted and people start to think men (gay or straight) don’t also want/experience emotional closeness, comfort, etc. This stereotype is even worse for gay men since there is no woman in the relationship to “provide” the emotional aspect.
#10 by Jessica on February 3, 2009 - 7:03 pm
carolyn jean wrote:
Of course I am! Ye of little faith!
Thanks for reminding me about the Lear. I will read it. And no, I have never read Balzac, shamefully, although I have long admired Rodin’s interpretation of him.
@ Sarah Frantz:
I do want to read more m/m. I did read some of the Jamie Samms stories on line that you recommended which I really liked. Thank you!
@ Margie:
Thank you for that recommendation, and for visiting!
@ Tumperkin:
Ok, Lear it is.
PS. Hey, when are we going to post our reviews of Rosenthal? (I still have to write mine, of course. ahem.)
#11 by Tumperkin on February 4, 2009 - 4:31 pm
I’ve done mine. It’s waaaay longer than usual. I’ll email you.