Archive for: February, 2009

And the Winner is… Meri

Feb 28 2009 Published by under Uncategorized

Congrats Meri, and thanks to everyone who commented. You helped tremendously.  Look for my post on penis envy in romance some time after next week.

I found it very interesting, BTW, that so many people were sure they had seen the Big Reveals dozens of times, but couldn’t come up with many examples. Does this mean this trope is facing an era of shrinkage? Or are the heroines just less sheltered?

Meri — Please email me at jessica@racyromancereviews.com with the email address to which you want me to send the Amazon gift certificate!

The official results form Random.org:

There were 10 items in your list. Here they are in random order:

1. Meri

2. Willaful

3. Sherry

4. Victoria

5. Laura

6. Jill

7. JenB

8. Katiebabs

9. Kyra

10. Tumperkin

Timestamp: 2009-02-28 13:27:52 UTC

6 responses so far

Review: Definitely Dead, by Charlaine Harris

Feb 28 2009 Published by under Reviews, Sookie Stackhouse

13704567

My Take In Brief: I have a huge bone to pick with Ms. Harris on this one. And some smaller ones. The least successful book in the series from my point of view.

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

NEAR Review: The Diving Bell and the Butterly, by Jean-Dominique Bauby

Feb 27 2009 Published by under NEAR Reviews

NEAR: Not exactly a romance

5cd0228348a033301b1f3110l

My Take In Brief: An amazing book. A difficult and wonderful book. A quick read that will stay with me for a very long time.

You can read the first chapter and the NYT Review here.

Amazon.com:  4.5 stars after 161 reviews

This brief (132 page) 1997 memoir by former French Elle editor Bauby, who suffered from locked-in syndrome as a result of a massive stroke, was made into a widely acclaimed film (by American Julian Schnabel who directed Basquiat and Before Night Falls) in 2007.   That was when I first heard of Bauby’s story. I bought this book a few months ago, and when I started reading it the other day, I found it impossible to put down. The book is divided into very short — 2 or 3 page — chapters, and has a very gripping, propulsive feel, despite the fact that much of the “action” takes place in Bauby’s head — his memories, or his impressions of daily life in the French seaside hospital that has become his home.

The title refers to Bauby’s description of life with locked-in syndrome: he is mute and paralyzed, and communicates by blinking his one good eye (1 blink for “A”, 2 blinks for “B”, etc. — except the order was actually the most used to least used letters in the French alphabet). This entire memoir was transcribed in this painstaking way, a phenomenal achievement, even if the result hadn’t been this transporting book.  His useless body is his “diving bell”, his mind is his “butterfly”.

I would be lying if I did not admit there are some very sad passages in this book, the one when his children come to visit being the worst for me.  But the amazing thing is that you come away thinking what an incredible memoirist and prose stylist Bauby was, and since he didn’t publish anything prior to this book, you wonder by what miracle it is that this unspeakable tragedy created the irony, ruefulness, reflectiveness, focus, and space that it took to give Bauby something to write and a voice and a means to do it.

Here’s Bauby reflecting on something his condition has taken away:

“Want to play hangman? asks Théophile, and I ache to tell him that I have enough on my plate playing quadriplegic. But my communication system disqualifies repartee: the keenest rapier grows dull and falls flat when it takes several minutes to thrust it home. By the time you strike, even you no longer understand what had seemed so witty before you started to dictate it, letter by letter. So the rule is to avoid impulsive sallies. It deprives conversation of all its sparkle, all those gems you bat back and forth like a ball — and I count this forced lack of humor one of the great drawbacks of my condition.

Whenever I entertain fantasies of being a writer, it is never as a fiction writer, but as a memoirist. Just the way I bet many of you feel when you read a wonderful piece of fiction, that uplifting feeling of the possibility of creating a moving narrative, is how I felt while reading this book. It’s somehow awe-inspiring and galvanizing at the same time.

In many ways The Diving Bell and the Butterfly is about narrative, and about writing more specifically. Bauby was a voracious reader before his accident, and literary references come easily to him. His grandfather reminded him of Victor Hugo.  He compares himself to a character in Dumas. An especially moving memory has him traveling with a female companion on a pilgrimage to Lourdes. But Bauby is more interested in his 600 page book which he cannot stop reading. The trouble he has looking out of the car window, walking to an observation point, or leaving the book in the back seat will feel familiar to any of us who has become obsessed with a story.

The ways that narrative and identity are shaped and contituted by memory is also a crucial theme. Bauby’s memories are the wings of his existence – they don’t merely keep him buoyed by recalling good times, they keep alive his sense of who he is, helping to connect the witty fashion editor he was then to the invalid he is now, and by helping him to make current sense of his existence. A memory of a visit to a racetrack when he got so caught up in the atmosphere that he forgot to place a bet prompts this reflection, which is one of the passages that I think will always be with me:

Today it seems to me that my whole life was nothing but a string of those small near misses: a race whose result we know beforehand but in which we fail to bet on the winner.

There are many many breathtakingly beautiful (and often heartbreaking) images in this book. If you love words, and reflection on words, you will love it. I close this review with my favorite image, one that brought tears to my eyes in delight. Bauby is reflecting on the letters his friends and acquaintances send him in the hospital:

I hoard all these letters like treasure. One day I hope to fasten them end to end in a half-mile streamer, to float in the wind like a banner raised to the glory of friendship.

2 responses so far

Bouquets and Blogbats Feb 09

Feb 27 2009 Published by under Uncategorized

Some things I have really enjoyed traveling the Romanceland this month:

bouquet_printanier

1. The discussions of objectivity and bias in reviewing initiated by Azteclady at Karen Knows Best and Jane at Dear Author (and especially Janet/Robin’s tough questions, which I am still pondering). It may be easy to agree that some level of objectivity is desired in romance reviewing, but the devil is in the details.

2. Pub Rants. In addition to having a glamorous-sounding life and listening to cool music (she always lets readers know what’s playing in her iPod), she has great insight into the biz, and very direct advice for aspiring writers. This week Kristin talks about passing on a book that she later discovered another major press took on.

3. Wendy. I love everything Wendy writes, actually, but I especially love her posts on her work as a librarian. The posts on recommending a book to a patron, on what to do with donated books, on the panels she has organized…it’s fascinating to see the genre through her eyes. Too often we focus on the business end of romance, but I get probably 40% of my books from my local library. Libraries have a crucial role to play, I think, in determining and maintaining the romance canon, in keeping romance reading going in recession, in normalizing and integrating the genre for the general public. Wendy is an amazing ally to have!

800px-bat_shadow_blacksvg

As promised, these are all about Triple R. It’s only fair, if 100% self-indulgent, that I direct my criticism inward. Warning: Comments which dispute what I say here will be creatively edited, but you may add your own criticisms (although if you make me cry I will delete it. I can only take so much.)

1. This blog is so unattractive you couldn’t pay me to set one toe out of my reader to actually view it. Mauve? Shudder. And the “design” (note scare quotes) sucks. Can’t you center a single frigging photo? And what’s up with that nasty looking sidebar? Have some pride, woman!

2. Voice: totally inconsistent. What exactly are you doing here? One day it’s another romance review, the next it’s some wordy confusing essay, the next it’s some silly list. Is this a hobby or academic? Some weeks you post once, other weeks you post 5 times. Random and annoying.

3. Introducing new features only to abandon them. How come you have only done one “Mad to Miss It”? And what happened to “What (Not) to Do Wednesday? Irritating.

4. Infrequent contests, no ARC reviews, no breaking industry news, no author interviews, no polls. Nothing FUN! Why would I want to read a ponderous review of a two year old category? Sheesh!

5. Making mountains out of molehills. The worst example of this — although there are many to choose from, believe me — had to be your post on kerfuffles. I mean, seriously. Not everything is worth a 1000 word meditation.

7 responses so far

Twitter: I Haz Succumbed

Feb 26 2009 Published by under Blogs and blogging, Navel gazing

Today I joined Twitter. You can find me at RRRJessica.

I don’t know what to make of it, honestly.

It does meet two desires I didn’t know I had (isn’t that what technology does in a capitalist economy? Create new needs it can expensively fill?):

1. You feel like there’s constant fun-seeming activity, even when no one is visiting your blog, or posting new blog posts, which is nice. It makes me wonder whether I hear a sucking sound in Romanceland, or is it just sucking away the fat (see #2)?

2. You feel like you can post the inane personal things you sometimes want to post on your blog but know no one is interested in.

Most people on Twitter aren’t interested either, but there seem to be no conventions: there’s no desired level of discourse, no need to worry about the worth of what you write. You don’t announce your arrival or bid anyone adieu. You can ignore Tweets. It’s very freeing in a sense, like a Tower of Babel we construct tweet by tweet.

Like Myspace and Facebook, there are also ways to measure popularity and status. It looks to me like having more followers than people followed is the main measure, and it more or less replicates popularity in the blogophere, which you can also measure by “who travels to whom”. So, for example, Jane at Dear Author follows 27 but has 445 followers, while Smartbitch Sarah follows a mere 10, but has 1112 followers. Me, on the other hand: I follow 24 and have 10 followers, and those proportions will likely only get worse as I add more people to follow.

Some romance bloggers have restricted accounts and I can only shudder to think what calamities await me on Twitter that might make me decide to do that.

There are several people I have not found on Twitter who should be there if your local stodgy aged professor (as opposed to the hip professor represented by Dr. Frantz) is doing it. I won’t name names but you know who you are.

Most other romance bloggers have some authors on their followed lists, and I haven’t done that yet. I am not sure why.

Anyway, this was just a record of my initial impressions after one half day of it. Do you Twitter? Why or why not?

23 responses so far

Look! My New Kindle 2.0!

Feb 24 2009 Published by under Navel gazing

Out of the box and reading my first book in under ten minutes. YES!!

Here are some blurry (sorry, I cannot take a picture to save my life) pics:

Cool packaging

Cool packaging

Meet your paper sisters!

Meet your paper sisters!

Fits on the nightstand

Fits on the nightstand

img_3438

And we're off...

although let’s admit that this cover:

n284466Is way more fun than THIS cover:

img_3439

I’ll be taking this little baby with me on vacation next week, and hopefully will have a user report when I get back. At this moment, I must say I am so thankful I went the path of least technological resistance. This thing is idiot proof! (So says the idiot who had been using it for a total of 15 minutes! LOL!)

Here’s an unusually sane and accurate review of the new Kindle from today’s NYTimes. (Most reviews are either technopohobes who hate the idea of ebooks, Kindle fanatics who have lost all sense of proportion, or geeks who think one electronic device should do 80 million things.)

7 responses so far

My Nomination for Who’s Who In America

Feb 24 2009 Published by under Navel gazing

wa63-4c

In my in box today:

It is my pleasure to inform you that you are being considered for inclusion in the upcoming 2010 Edition of Who’s Who in America, which is scheduled for publication in October 2009.

To be considered for inclusion in this prestigious publication, you need only provide the requested information by completing our secure and easy-to-use online Biographical Data Form by March 30, 2009.

The information you provide will be evaluated according to the selection standards Marquis Who’s Who has developed over 110 years as the world’s premier biographical publisher. If your data passes our initial screening, we will prepare your biography in Marquis Who’s Who format and send you a pre-publication proof for your verification and approval.

I congratulate you on the achievements that have brought your name to the attention of our editorial committee. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Fred Marks
Senior Managing Director
Editorial and Selection Committee

Ok, so rather than fill out their form online, I thought I would simply do it on this blog. If they really want me, they’ll find it.

Dear Mr. Marks,

The following are my top achievements in recent times:

1. Not losing any jewelry

2. Never once walking out of the house in one brown boot and one black boot all winter

3. Not falling down in front of anyone (my dog doesn’t count)

4. Making a gluten free dessert that actually tastes good

5. Not spoon feeding my horrible kitten to my no good puppy

6. Missing children’s school bus (either way) fewer than 2 times

7. Minimal parking tickets and library fines

8. Holding the family record for EA Skate Hall of Meat (most broken bones and bruises)

9. Getting my pathologically morose mail carrier to make small talk

10. Developing a regular flossing habit

These may not look like achievements on the scale of the Nobel Prize or the Pulitzer, but I’m pretty sure I worked just as hard for them.

Thank you. I look forward to hearing from the committee.

Sincerely,

Jessica

PS. Tucker Carlson calls this book the “Hall of Lame”, and it’s the one thing I agree with him about! It’s more an accident than an honor to be “selected”.

5 responses so far

Review: Dead As A Doornail, by Charlaine Harris

Feb 23 2009 Published by under Reviews, Sookie Stackhouse

n1383651

My Take In Brief: For pure enjoyment, my favorite one so far, although I do sympathize with those who felt it was a mishmash.

Series?: Yes, this is number 5 in the Southern Vampire Mysteries, of which there are 8 in print at this writing. Check the reviews page on the sidebar to read my reviews of the first four books in the series.

Plot: Sookie stays in Bon Temps, and trouble comes to her in the form of the return of Alcide, who wants Sookie’s help in his father’s bid for pack master, Tara’s creepy vamp boyfriend, a new bartender at Merlotte’s, on loan from Eric’s bar, who may not be what he seems, and her brother’s new life as a were.

Continue Reading »

3 responses so far

Older posts »