Archive for: January, 2009

NEAR Review: The Diving Pool, by Yoko Ogawa

Jan 18 2009 Published by under NEAR Reviews

ogawa-diving-pool

About NEAR Reviews: One of the nicest things about reading romance is that it has awakened my interest in reading all kinds of books.  When I review a book that’s neither a romance, nor a book or author that the romance community has embraced (like Charlaine Harris or Sharon Shinn, for example), I’ll label it with NEAR, for Not Even A Romance.

Fun Factoid: This was a Reading the World 2008 title. In 1990, Yoko Ogawa won the Akutagawa Award, one of the most important awards for fiction in Japan. I love the short story form, and while I’m no expert in Japanese literature, I love Ryunosuke Akutagawa (two of whose stories were the basis for Kurosawa’s 1950 film Rashomon).

Word on the Web:

Britain’s Independent, very positive

Masculine clarity has no place here. It is the irrational that comes naturally to Ogawa’s women. The narrators of “The Diving Pool” and “Pregnancy Diary” commit atrocious deeds – tormenting a toddler, possibly poisoning a pregnant woman – as if by reflex, barely aware not only of the consequences, but almost of the act. Rarely have first-person narratives been so opaque. This may be one source of their power to disturb. Is it possible to be a monster, all unknowing?

Booklit, Stewart, not so positive

“[That t]here’s much to appreciate here, and that Ogawa has a back catalogue ripe for translation, is reason enough to dive in, even if these three novellas are the shallow end.”

Japan Today,  Bryan Hartzheim (reprinted from Metropois Magazine) (this is the best positive review, IMO)

Ogawa’s prose calls to mind that of a Truman Capote or the later Junichiro Tanizaki, capable of pairing beautiful metaphor and vivid description with the coldest and most grotesque of human thoughts and behaviors.

The three stories are also unmistakably framed by Ogawa’s approach at an ironic interiority — ironic because, while the stories are presented in the first person by female narrators, remarkably little is revealed by their thoughts alone. Rather, we learn about them by the simultaneously minute and monstrous actions that they themselves barely register, not because they aren’t conscious of their cruelty, but possibly because they don’t realize — as Ogawa frequently questions — the incomprehensible reasons for how or why people treat and mistreat each other.

Pedestal Magazine, positive

Some of Ogawa’s language choices will startle. Few fiction writers make such unique choices and achieve so much by them.

Entertainment Weekly, B

Washington Post, Janice P Nimura (another excellent review)

Ogawa writes stories that float free of any specific culture, anchoring themselves instead in the landscape of the mind. Her hallucinatory, oddly barbed stories snag the imagination, and linger.

Amazon.com: 4 stars after 7 reviews

The Racy Romance Review:

The three stories in The Diving Pool were published in the early 1990s. The English translation by Stephen Snyder came out in January 2008. I first read Ogawa, who is a very prolific Japanese writer of novels and short stories, in the New Yorker, where Pregnancy Diary (full text at link), one of the novellas in this book, was first published in English (You get a lifetime subscription to the New Yorker when you get your PhD in the humanities. It comes with the secret handshake.).

On terminology: I am going to use “novella” and “story” interchangeably in this review. You can say novellas are 50 or more pages (this is how publishers see it), and short stories are – um – shorter, and you can point to other differences, like that conflict needs to be established right away in a short story but not in a novella, but I am going to blithely ignore all of that here, except to say that in (English) length these are novellas, but in the unresolved endings, they feel like short stories to me.

During a visit to my local library a few weeks ago, the beautiful cover of this collection caught my eye, and I took it home (maybe because I spend a lot of time in the winter poolside). It has taken me quite a while to finish this collection. It’s not long (each story is about 50 pages) but so disturbing that I needed recovery time between each one.

Here are brief reviews of each of the three novellas:

The Diving Pool

Aya, a teenager in suburban Tokyo, is obsessed with her adopted brother, Jun. Aya has been raised in the orphanage run by her birth parents, and feels, paradoxically, like the odd one out, the orphan herself. Jun is on the diving team at the high school, and watching him is the greatest, most secret joy in Aya’s life:

Sometimes I wish I could describe how wonderful I feel in those few seconds from the time he spreads his arms above his head, as if trying to grab hold of something, to the instant he vanishes into the water. but I can never find the right words. Perhaps it’s because he’s falling through time, to a place where words can never reach.

Aya is bitter and sad, overlooked and lonely, with a cruel streak and a deep desire for love and acknowledgment that is twisted into obsession and a sadistic desire for power over others. She’s lyrical and astute in her observations of others.

What I loved about this novella (and the other two) was the imagery. It’s poetical writing. Many of the images are grotesque, and often involved food used in very unusual ways. Here are just a few examples:

…I can never hear the words “family” and “home” without feeling that they sound strange, never simply hear them, and let them go. When I stop to examine them, though, the words seem hollow, seem to rattle at my feet like empty cans.

***

Her lips were like two maggots that never stopped wriggling, and I found myself wanting to squash them between my two fingers.

***

The tiny legs protruding from the elastic hems of her pants looked like past of smooth, white butter. Whether they are dark and blotchy, covered in a rash, or rippling with rings of fat, I am always fascinated by a baby’s thighs. There is something almost erotic about their defensiveness, and yet they seem fresh and vivid, like separate living creatures.

The imagery tells us a lot about Aya, and often about its subject. It’s not just there, but connected to the author’s subtle and vivid renderings of human psychology. There’s something very wrong with Aya, that she sees her mother’s lips and this innocent baby’s thighs, in this way.

I was drawn to this book in part because one of the reviewers on the back cover referred to it as “on the edge of the unspeakable”, and the touches of horror in the Sookie Stackhouse series, which I am now reading, have made me more interested in reading for the grotesque and horrific.

Aya ends up tormenting the baby whose thighs are described above. I was worried that baby torture would seem exploitative or just too much, but I was able to read those passages with relative ease. There were there for a purpose, and the purpose was met.

I wasn’t thrilled with the way the story ended: it seemed a bit moralistic for an author who had explored the human psyche with such complexity.

The Pregnancy Diary

In this story, the first person narrator, again a young single woman, lives with her pregnant sister and brother-in-law.  The cover copy suggests the pregnancy is a hallucination, but the text of the story did not suggest that to me at all.

Again, we have a narrator with a cruel streak: her sister packs on the pregnancy pounds thanks to the narrator’s constant grapefruit jam making, knowingly using imported fruits may contain toxins that harm developing fetuses.

In some ways this was even more awful to me to read about than the baby torture, because the narrator keeps preparing the jam for her sister after she discovers that it may harm the fetus.  It’s not even planful or emotional. It just … happens.

I like to think of evil as intentional (the fruit of human desire in some way). I guess this provides a source of hope that it can be deterred. In this novella, evil just drifts in to the scene without forethought or hope for gain. I found it terrifying.

The sister experiences two very common pregnancy symptoms: morning sickness, and, later, weight gain. Ogawa manages to make both commonplaces seem grotesque and unique.

Again, thanks to Ogawa, I will never look at ordinary food the same way again:

Half-cooked egg dripped from her fork like yellow blood. My brother-in-law was eating slices of kiwi. I can’t stand kiwi — all those seeds make me think of little black bugs, and the kiwi this morning was particularly ripe and soft. Beads of sweat had collected on the surface of the butter.

Ogawa takes things that are supposed to be supreme human comforts: food and pregnancy, and turns them monstrous.

The way all of the characters relate to the pregnancy is so unusual. In so many ways, pregnancy is terrifying and absurd.  At one point, the narrator tells us:

My sister and her husband never talk about the baby in front of me. They act as if there’s no connection between the pgregnacy and the fact that there’s a baby in her belly. Which may explain why it has no concrete existence for me.

***

[The pregnant sister is speaking] I’m filled with sadness, and I realize what scares me the most is the thought of meeting my own baby.

This narrator is even harder to read than the narrator of The Diving Pool. She works at a supermarket, she seems to love her sister (in her unique way), and that’s about all we know. Is the author telling us something about late twentieth century Japanese suburban ennui?

The ending of this once, while ambiguous, was much more satisfying to this reader.

Dormitory

In this story, a young woman whose husband is in Sweden visits her old college dormitory with her younger cousin. There she meets the Manager, a triple amputee, and learns that the dorm has been suffering declining occupancy since a student disappeared from it months prior.

This narrator is as depressed and low affect as the others, but easier to sympathize with. She also suffers from a curious detachment. She can’t picture Sweden, where she is to join her husband soon — it’s too abstract and different. Her days are “swollen into an indistinguishable mass by the damp weather.” She feels “like a silkworm in a cocoon.”

Her husband sends her a list of practical tasks to accomplish, like getting her passport in order, and it baffles her:

Somehow I couldn’t really understand what he was trying to say. The words — “market”, “squirrel”, “passport”, “moving company” — were like obscure philosophical terms.

She becomes attached to the Manager, tending to him, and this little world of the collapsing dormitory seems so at odds with her husband’s in Sweden that she can hardly believe they both exist.

Ogawa pays a lot of attention to bodies (lovingly, obsessively, hatefully, monstrously) and the Manager’s body is attended to with a level of detail that I felt bordered on exploitative.

The ending of this one was not at all what I expected.  The way it connected nature, insects, horror, and food, with fear, hope, mystery, wonder, and cruelty was pure Ogawa.

You know how, in romances, you get smells, sounds, touch, taste, sights — and it’s all usually fairly positive if not downright enticing? Ogawa is like the anti-romantic author in the ways she shows us how our senses oppress and mystify us.

I can’t say I enjoyed this book, but I loved it. I think I’ll assign Pregnaancy Diary in one of my feminist theory courses where I teach Julia Kristeva’s “Stabat Mater”, or in my ethics and fiction course.

8 responses so far

Naked In Death, The Worst Romance Ever Written

Jan 16 2009 Published by under Uncategorized

NOTE: This is a “joke” review, meant as a parody of Amazon reviews.

By Guest Reviewer, Ms. Emma Zon

I just read the worst romance ever written.

I haven’t actually ever read any other romance novels, but I feel very confident in writing this review.

People who love this book have probably read so many romances that they are totally biased. One thing I know for sure is that I came to this book with a blank mind.

Nude in Death was the debut book by the author JD Robb. I should cut a newbie some slack, but everything about this book is dreadful.

On to my review:

First of all, Nude in Death is not even set in a real time and place. I think it’s supposed to be the future, but everyone knows romances are set in the past (they call these “Monarchies”) or the present (“Contemporaneous”).

The heroine is Eve, a cop. The hero is a rich Irish guy named Ruark.

Right, like there are any rich Irish guys.

Eve is an unreliable narrator: we can’t believe anything she says.

For one thing, she suffers from false memory syndrome. She thinks that she was abused and molested by her father and then abandoned at the age of eight. Since there were no witnesses to this, and since she seems gung ho in bed, it’s clear that these are false memories.

Eve’s memories were probably implanted by the police therapist, who is unbalanced and very jealous of Eve. I know this because of lines like this: “However mild they were, Mira’s eyes were sharp and searching.” When words like “sharp” and “searching” are used, it’s code for “this character is evil.” (I also know not to trust any psychologist, because Tom Cruise told me not to. On the Today Show. Two sources I never doubt.)

Eve is unreliable in a second way as well: she is a closeted homosexual.  Eve has very short hair and she’s tough and is a cop. So obviously gay. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

I was hoping for some interesting interactions between her and that other detective — Peabody.  But then it was like the author got scared of the backlash or something and decided to go straight. (I asked my gay online friend about this and she totally agrees.)

The worst part was the sex scenes. You would think a supposed romance novelist would get this part right, since romances are basically sex scenes strung together by wordy excuses to get to the next sex scene. (You can tell this is true by looking at the covers of these books.)

Here’s an example of how bad the sex scenes in Naked in Death are:

I haven’t got time for this,” she said quickly, and found her back pressed against the tile wall. “It was a mistake in the first place. I have to go.”

“It won’t take long.” he felt a hard slap of lust when he cupped her hips, lifted her. “It wasn’t a mistake then, or now. And I have to have you.”

I don’t want to presume or anything, because I’m not a published author (yet), but tweaking this a bit would have made it so much better. Like this:

“I haven’t got time for this,” she said, breathing heavily, her hot breath fanning his whiskers (he hadn’t shaved yet, so powerful was his need for her) and making him sneeze, a juicy sexy spray.

“You’d better. It’s going to take a long time” he said, glancing with awe, and, curiously, some surprise, down at his nether region. “A long, long time, if you know what I mean”.

He waggled his eyebrows and her resistance melted like the Ivory soap in her strong, but not totally unfeminine, hand.

I don’t understand how there can be so much bad writing these days, with the internet and everything. It took me barely 30 seconds (according to Google search results) to find this example of truly outstanding erotic writing, from a novel by Norman Mailer, which even won a prize:

Klara turned head to foot, and put her most unmentionable part down on his hard-breathing nose and mouth, and took his old battering ram into her lips. Uncle was now as soft as a coil of excrement. She sucked on him nonetheless with an avidity that could come only from the Evil One – that she knew. From there, the impulse had come. So now they both had their heads at the wrong end, and the Evil One was there. He had never been so close before.

The Hound began to come to life. Right in her mouth. It surprised her. Alois had been so limp. But now he was a man again!

I think if JD Robb had, instead of rushing to publication, done a bit more reading and research, her first outing would have gone better.  That is why I am doing all of this reading and writing reviews: to learn my craft.

Ok, so setting was all wrong, the characters were unbelievable and the sex scenes were terrible. But what about the mystery?

A conservative Senator’s daughter is murdered. The letter found next to the body  suggests this is the first of 6 murders. The victim was a “licensed companion”, a prostitute, basically, which embarrasses her family.  Ruark is a suspect, which creates problems for Eve.

Now, this makes no sense, and is an instance of what we call “inconsistent world building”. Either prostitution is legal or it’s not. Wouldn’t the senator be proud that his daughter has decided to pursue the art of legal pleasure? Just as he is serving his people, so she is serving hers.

I suppose the mystery might have made more sense if I hadn’t skipped the middle third of the book, but I didn’t need to read the whole book. I am one of those people who forms strong opinions based on very little evidence.

JD Robb got very popular. There are about a dozen of these In Death books in print. I know, I was shocked, too. But I always say the really good authors are the ones very few people have read or know about or care about. Hopefully, I will be one of those one day.

29 responses so far

Bouquets and Blogbats, January 09

Jan 15 2009 Published by under Uncategorized

A monthly feature wherein I opinionate on other folks’ blogs.

800px-bat_shadow_blacksvg

Blogbats to… (things that are annoying me this month)

1. Blogs that tell everyone who is visiting and from where

Maybe if I lived in New York or London or anywhere but Immediately Identifiable Place No One Else in the Blogosphere lives, I wouldn’t mind. But sometimes I want to visit and lurk, and I feel I’ve been outed when I look at the sidebar and there I am.

Irrational, I know, but there it is.

2. Blogs that provide partial posts in feeds.

There are two arguments for this heinous practice:

1. If your blog is monetized (you want to make money off it), partial feeds get you more traffic.

As to this argument, I (and many other smarter people) say bupkis:

Survey after survey has shown that users overwhelmingly prefer full feeds. Some have even said that they refuse to subscribe to a short feed and, according to FeedBurner, who manages over 800,000 feeds, there is virtually no difference in the click-through rate for partial vs. full feeds.

2. Partial feeds make it more difficult for sploggers to steal your content.

Again, I (and the experts) say bupkis.

[T]he flaw in this logic is that it ignores how scrapers find the content and how they use it. Spammers do not locate articles and feeds to pull content from based upon length, but through an automated process that detects keywords and phrases. They also obtain RSS feeds through large RSS lists, much like email lists, that are passed around and sold among the black hat crowd.

Either way, little evaluation is given to the length of the feed when choosing where to scrape from.

Finally, truncating the feed may not limit the benefit many spammers get from the content. For one, since spammers are typically targeting keywords, truncating the feed might increase the keyword density and actually help them. Second, many spammers are voluntarily truncating the feeds they scrape to avoid duplicate content penalties and reduce their copyright liability.

So, hear my plea: give me all of your wonderful words in my reader!!!

bouquet_printanier

Bouquets to… (things I love this month)

1. The Book Smugglers’: New Look. Awesome, easy to navigate, and they even got hot likenesses in their banner.

2. Romancing the Blog: How awesome is this blog? It’s one of the few author blogs I visit. Lots of different voices (readers, too), always saying something just interesting enough to keep my attention, and just long enough that I can actually finish the post in one sitting.

3. Ramblings on Romance For the tone — Kristie and Katiebabs keep it not just civil, but positively benevolent. I was reading Kristie’s “Best of 2008″ post and this sentence caught my eye,

There are a couple of books not on the above list that I think would be on it if I had had time to read them.

That sentence just typifies what I love about this blog. In another, more recent post, “Enough Already”, Kristie rants about a few things that have been bothering her. But even in the midst of this “rant”, she has the diplomacy to refer to JR Ward fans as “passionate”.  Even when they don’t like books, the gals at RoR have read them carefully, and will intersperse the negative comments with “sigh” or “sadly” rather than (as would be more my style) evil cackles and the search for ever more perjorative adjectives.

16 responses so far

What (Not) To Do Wednesday: Black Dagger Edition

Jan 14 2009 Published by under What (Not) to Do Wednesday

Was Wrath wrong? (say that three times fast!)

045121695401lzzzzzzz

Dark Lover is the second romance novel I read, after Lover Revealed. As you may recall, it stars Wrath, King of the Vampires, who, when we meet him, has been shirking his monarchial birthright in favor of satisfyingly gruesome fights with the anti-vamp Lessening Society.  Wrath is mated to Marissa, but has never consummated their union.  Fellow Black Dagger Brother Darius asks Wrath to see his half human daughter, 25 year old Beth, though her “transition” — a kind of vamp puberty — since halflings often don’t survive and Wrath’s blood is so ancient and strong. Wrath, who has never met a duty he didn’t want to shirk, declines.

We discover that Wrath has one of my most unfavorite motivations for his self-loathing: a childhood tragedy on which he blames his childhood self. Like so many of Ward’s heroes, he’s clinically depressed (feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt, loss of interest in pleasurable activities, lack of appetite, agitation, irritability, etc.).

When Darius dies, Wrath decides he has to help Beth — who has no idea she’s not 100% human –  though her transition and visits her apartment.

And they have sex.

peter_steele_2861

For her part, if you can put aside the fact that Beth’s lust for Wrath coincides with her belief that he’s not only a killer, but in her apartment, at that moment, to to kill her (Ward throws psychological reality a bone by having Beth refer to this perfect storm of emotions as “extraordinary”), she’s pretty refreshingly unconflicted: she wants this hunk o’ man and wants him now.

But poor Wrath. He has a difficult time of it. At first, he thinks Beth is coming on to him because she’s been second hand smoked into submission: he’s been puffing on the BDB equivalent of weed –  until he remembers that “it’s a relaxant, not an aphrodisiac” (right … because roofies, the “date rape drug”, are benzodiazepines, and benzos are … erm … muscle relaxants.  Sorry. I’ll stop.)

Wrath “knew he should say no” because “this was unfair to her.” Why? Because “he was a selfish bastard to take what she was offering in the haze of smoke.”

Post coitus, Wrath adds a few more reasons: she’s Darius’s daughter, she had been the victim of a sexual assault the night before, and she was about to “have her whole world turned upside down” (the transition, not to mention the small matter of her father being a vampire — and recently bombed into smithereens)

I always felt like Wrath was too hard on himself here.  Or am I just giving him the alpha pass?

6 responses so far

Should You Review A Friend’s Book? Arguments For and Against a Common Practice

Jan 12 2009 Published by under Ethics, Reviews

William Blake, Europe Supported By Africa and America, 1796

(I know a lot of you have been over this, but I started this blog to work some things out for myself, and that’s what I’m doing here. Apologies for reinventing the wheel, but it’s my speciality!)

Arguments against:

Continue Reading »

25 responses so far

Review: Untamed, by Pamela Clare

Jan 11 2009 Published by under Reviews

novel_untamed

My Take in Brief: An enjoyable romance in an unusual setting.

Continue Reading »

5 responses so far

Review: Dead to the World, Charlaine Harris

Jan 09 2009 Published by under Reviews

-

My Take In Brief: Surprise! Jessica loves another Sookie Stackhouse book!

Note: This review contains spoilers for this book, and for the previous books in the series. It’s also insufferably long. Click on any of the links below for a more concise spoiler free review. Scroll down to the Related Posts section for my reviews of the first three books in the series.

Continue Reading »

9 responses so far

What (Not) To Do Wednesday: Love, Actually

Jan 07 2009 Published by under What (Not) to Do Wednesday

In which I trash a beloved scene in a beloved film.

love-actually-287656760

From day 1 of “Triple R”, as my spouse calls this blog, I have wanted to do a regular feature on moral reasoning in romance. Why? Because it’s how I read romance: for the moral muddles (okay, and for the man titty).

You might be wondering if we really need another column on moral dilemmas in Romancelandia.  Silly! Of course we do! Smart Bitches Trashy Books recently introduced a regular feature in which they offer advice, romance style, to readers, based on what they’ve learned from romance novels. And Karen Scott introduced Moral Dilemma Fridays, which has nothing to do with romance, but invites readers to ponder things like whether they should return a stolen wallet.

Mine is a bit different, since I’m talking about moral issues in fiction, not real life. Typically, I’ll write about books, but with the holidays just behind us, the film Love Actually got a lot of play, and I was reminded of my unpopular opinion about this popular film. (Future installments will be more open ended and less ranty, I promise!)

Continue Reading »

22 responses so far

« Newer posts Older posts »

Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: