<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Invented Paranormal Romance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/</link>
	<description>Book Reviews, Philosophy, Academic Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:11:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bookdaze</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>bookdaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-210</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I have such a hard time seeing Outlander as a paranormal. I;m not sure why.&lt;/i&gt;

Maybe because with the exception of the time travel part, no one has any special powers and there are no supernatural creatures?

It&#039;s what I alluded to earlier when trying to distinguish futuristic v. paranormal romance - again, in a futuristic storyline, there&#039;s no &quot;magic&quot; as such, any additional abilities just comes from it being a more technologically advanced culture.  I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I have such a hard time seeing Outlander as a paranormal. I;m not sure why.</i></p>
<p>Maybe because with the exception of the time travel part, no one has any special powers and there are no supernatural creatures?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s what I alluded to earlier when trying to distinguish futuristic v. paranormal romance &#8211; again, in a futuristic storyline, there&#8217;s no &#8220;magic&#8221; as such, any additional abilities just comes from it being a more technologically advanced culture.  I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-209</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does anyone think Anne Rice should be on it? I read one of her books years ago, but it seemed to have some romantic elements.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was a huge fan of Rice&#039;s early vampire books back in the day.  There is something very romantic about them (&lt;i&gt;The Vampire Lestat&lt;/i&gt; in particular) and yet I couldn&#039;t call them romances.  I do think that Linda Lael Miller&#039;s vampire romances were influenced by Rice&#039;s works, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does anyone think Anne Rice should be on it? I read one of her books years ago, but it seemed to have some romantic elements.</p></blockquote>
<p>I was a huge fan of Rice&#8217;s early vampire books back in the day.  There is something very romantic about them (<i>The Vampire Lestat</i> in particular) and yet I couldn&#8217;t call them romances.  I do think that Linda Lael Miller&#8217;s vampire romances were influenced by Rice&#8217;s works, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Thank you, everyone, for these great suggestions. I&#039;m compiling a list.

I have such a hard time seeing Outlander as a paranormal. I;m not sure why.

Does anyone think Anne Rice should be on it? I read one of her books years ago, but it seemed to have some romantic elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, everyone, for these great suggestions. I&#8217;m compiling a list.</p>
<p>I have such a hard time seeing Outlander as a paranormal. I;m not sure why.</p>
<p>Does anyone think Anne Rice should be on it? I read one of her books years ago, but it seemed to have some romantic elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allie</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Allie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 04:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Nancy Gideon wrote vampire romance before it became popular.  I have never read these authors, but again they were around before paranomral was popular.  Amanda Ashley and Maggie Shayne.
I read Nancy A. Collins and found her books to be more in the horror side of fiction than romance. I remember there be little to no romance involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Gideon wrote vampire romance before it became popular.  I have never read these authors, but again they were around before paranomral was popular.  Amanda Ashley and Maggie Shayne.<br />
I read Nancy A. Collins and found her books to be more in the horror side of fiction than romance. I remember there be little to no romance involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bookdaze</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>bookdaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the linkage.  I&#039;d forgotten I did that post  :-)

I sort of agree with the posters above who think Sweet Starfire is more of a SF/futuristic romance than a paranormal one, though it&#039;s a fairly thin line that keeps shifting.  I remember liking it and her Gift of Gold/Silver books, so I think they&#039;re worth hunting down.

The Nancy Collins books sound interesting, esp with the Anita Blake comparison.  Though Anita isn&#039;t actually a vampire, unless I&#039;ve missed something!



Li</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the linkage.  I&#8217;d forgotten I did that post  <img src='http://www.readreactreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I sort of agree with the posters above who think Sweet Starfire is more of a SF/futuristic romance than a paranormal one, though it&#8217;s a fairly thin line that keeps shifting.  I remember liking it and her Gift of Gold/Silver books, so I think they&#8217;re worth hunting down.</p>
<p>The Nancy Collins books sound interesting, esp with the Anita Blake comparison.  Though Anita isn&#8217;t actually a vampire, unless I&#8217;ve missed something!</p>
<p>Li</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stryker, Vamps, &#38; Romance &#124; Literary Escapism</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Stryker, Vamps, &#38; Romance &#124; Literary Escapism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-205</guid>
		<description>[...] Romance Reviews is asking a good questions, who invented the paranormal romance? Or maybe not invented, but who are the classics in this genre? They have some pretty good ideas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Romance Reviews is asking a good questions, who invented the paranormal romance? Or maybe not invented, but who are the classics in this genre? They have some pretty good ideas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie (Literary Escapism)</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie (Literary Escapism)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I forgot one...

Merlin&#039;s Legacy: Daughter of Fire by Quinn Taylor Evans (1999) - The first novel in a series of six, this is another one that I love and still sits on my shelf today.  It&#039;s very old world English and has a great twist, not on Merlin, but on his progeny and their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot one&#8230;</p>
<p>Merlin&#8217;s Legacy: Daughter of Fire by Quinn Taylor Evans (1999) &#8211; The first novel in a series of six, this is another one that I love and still sits on my shelf today.  It&#8217;s very old world English and has a great twist, not on Merlin, but on his progeny and their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie (Literary Escapism)</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie (Literary Escapism)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Mmm...that is a tough call.  I mean, when does a novel become a classic?  Does it depend on how many times it&#039;s been printed or how long has it been on the shelf?

For me, I have a couple of classics:
1.  Outlander by Diana Gabaldon (1991) - I love her series.  She&#039;s the only author I&#039;ve gone out and been at the bookstore when her hardcovers come out.  Usually I wait until the paperback comes out or I go to the library, but not for her.

2.  Forever and the Night by Linda Lael Miller (1993) - she was my first paranormal romance that I can remember and I love the series.  Her vampires and warlocks are interesting and yet she gives us more than just romance with them.

3.  The Irish Princess by Amy Fetzer (1999) - Another great start for a terrific trilogy.  While I don&#039;t believe the first one has as much paranormal aspects as the following two novels, it&#039;s still gives us a great story with interesting characters that still capture my attention today.  Granted, it&#039;s not that old, but I would still consider it a classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm&#8230;that is a tough call.  I mean, when does a novel become a classic?  Does it depend on how many times it&#8217;s been printed or how long has it been on the shelf?</p>
<p>For me, I have a couple of classics:<br />
1.  Outlander by Diana Gabaldon (1991) &#8211; I love her series.  She&#8217;s the only author I&#8217;ve gone out and been at the bookstore when her hardcovers come out.  Usually I wait until the paperback comes out or I go to the library, but not for her.</p>
<p>2.  Forever and the Night by Linda Lael Miller (1993) &#8211; she was my first paranormal romance that I can remember and I love the series.  Her vampires and warlocks are interesting and yet she gives us more than just romance with them.</p>
<p>3.  The Irish Princess by Amy Fetzer (1999) &#8211; Another great start for a terrific trilogy.  While I don&#8217;t believe the first one has as much paranormal aspects as the following two novels, it&#8217;s still gives us a great story with interesting characters that still capture my attention today.  Granted, it&#8217;s not that old, but I would still consider it a classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristie(J)</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristie(J)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Oh I LOVE my spreadsheet!!  I&#039;ve been keeping it for about 6 or 7 years now and it&#039;s made the transition through 4 computers and 3 jobs *g*.  I can find things in the blink of a moment.  For example - the annual AAR poll - because I have a column for what year a book was published, what year I read it, book title, author, genre - when I do filters, I can Very Quickly come up with my favourite Paranormal published in 2008.  Makes filling out the ballot ever so much easier *g*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I LOVE my spreadsheet!!  I&#8217;ve been keeping it for about 6 or 7 years now and it&#8217;s made the transition through 4 computers and 3 jobs *g*.  I can find things in the blink of a moment.  For example &#8211; the annual AAR poll &#8211; because I have a column for what year a book was published, what year I read it, book title, author, genre &#8211; when I do filters, I can Very Quickly come up with my favourite Paranormal published in 2008.  Makes filling out the ballot ever so much easier *g*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/18/who-invented-paranormal-romance/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=999#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Wait... you lost me at spreadsheet.

You have a &lt;em&gt;spreadsheet&lt;/em&gt;? I don&#039;t even have a spreadsheet for my grades or my mutual funds, let alone my romance reading. I have so much to learn!

I did read &lt;em&gt;Sweet Starfire&lt;/em&gt;, about 6 months ago, and thought it was a sweet but generic romance in superficially built SF world. Still, JAK gets all the credit for being one of the first.

The question of whether it&#039;s a paranormal at all is interesting -- in the link to TMT in the above, Prof. Frantz says a true paranormal has to have a lot of &quot;normal&quot;, which creates  a tension with the &quot;para&quot;, often between the H/H. This one doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8230; you lost me at spreadsheet.</p>
<p>You have a <em>spreadsheet</em>? I don&#8217;t even have a spreadsheet for my grades or my mutual funds, let alone my romance reading. I have so much to learn!</p>
<p>I did read <em>Sweet Starfire</em>, about 6 months ago, and thought it was a sweet but generic romance in superficially built SF world. Still, JAK gets all the credit for being one of the first.</p>
<p>The question of whether it&#8217;s a paranormal at all is interesting &#8212; in the link to TMT in the above, Prof. Frantz says a true paranormal has to have a lot of &#8220;normal&#8221;, which creates  a tension with the &#8220;para&#8221;, often between the H/H. This one doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.readreactreview.com @ 2012-02-11 04:58:33 -->
