<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: The Rake, Mary Jo Putney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/</link>
	<description>Rethinking romance and other fine fiction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Janssen</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Janssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-123</guid>
		<description>I should reread this one.  ONE PERFECT ROSE was my first Putney, and I have very fond memories of it; THE RAKE was my second, and set me firmly on a path of glomming.

My other faves of hers are RIVER OF FIRE (Regency artists, with bonus post-Napoleonic Wars angst!) and DANCING ON THE WIND (the rest of that series, the &quot;Angel&quot; books, are consistently good).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should reread this one.  ONE PERFECT ROSE was my first Putney, and I have very fond memories of it; THE RAKE was my second, and set me firmly on a path of glomming.</p>
<p>My other faves of hers are RIVER OF FIRE (Regency artists, with bonus post-Napoleonic Wars angst!) and DANCING ON THE WIND (the rest of that series, the &#8220;Angel&#8221; books, are consistently good).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristie(J)</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristie(J)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I think they probably were a bit more explicit in The Rake as TRATR was a traditional regency and they are a bit milder in that department.  But it was the more in depth knowledge of Reggie and Alys that I appreciated most about The Rake.  Also, it was explained more clearly WHY he inherited Strickland and why he was so torn about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they probably were a bit more explicit in The Rake as TRATR was a traditional regency and they are a bit milder in that department.  But it was the more in depth knowledge of Reggie and Alys that I appreciated most about The Rake.  Also, it was explained more clearly WHY he inherited Strickland and why he was so torn about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Janine, Got it bookmarked. Thank you!

Kristie, thank you for the info on the difference between the two versions. I was curious about that. I also read that the sex scenes were ramped up. Is that true?

Taja, Thank you for those recommendations!

As an aside, I thought no one would read this review of such as old book, but it&#039;s the best thread yet! Thanks everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janine, Got it bookmarked. Thank you!</p>
<p>Kristie, thank you for the info on the difference between the two versions. I was curious about that. I also read that the sex scenes were ramped up. Is that true?</p>
<p>Taja, Thank you for those recommendations!</p>
<p>As an aside, I thought no one would read this review of such as old book, but it&#8217;s the best thread yet! Thanks everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taja</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Taja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I liked &quot;The Rake&quot; and I agree, the last chapters didn&#039;t keep up with the ones before. And I second Janine&#039;s recommendations: &quot;Uncommon Vows&quot; is one of my favourite medievals, and &quot;Shattered Rainbows&quot; is really good too (the first part especially; I thought the ending a bit much).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked &#8220;The Rake&#8221; and I agree, the last chapters didn&#8217;t keep up with the ones before. And I second Janine&#8217;s recommendations: &#8220;Uncommon Vows&#8221; is one of my favourite medievals, and &#8220;Shattered Rainbows&#8221; is really good too (the first part especially; I thought the ending a bit much).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristie(J)</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristie(J)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I love this one!!  I&#039;ve read (and own) both The Rake and The Rake and the Reformer.  I had to do both because I read The Rake first, then wanted to see the difference between the two.  The Rake has more background information the The Rake and the Reformer and is a bit more padded.  But both are very enjoyable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this one!!  I&#8217;ve read (and own) both The Rake and The Rake and the Reformer.  I had to do both because I read The Rake first, then wanted to see the difference between the two.  The Rake has more background information the The Rake and the Reformer and is a bit more padded.  But both are very enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Oh, forgot to add:

http://used.addall.com/ is a good source for finding out of print books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, forgot to add:</p>
<p><a href="http://used.addall.com/" rel="nofollow">http://used.addall.com/</a> is a good source for finding out of print books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Really?  I knew the Gaffney was out of print but I had no idea about Beast.  What a shame!

That&#039;s one good thing about e-books -- backlists are going to stay in print longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  I knew the Gaffney was out of print but I had no idea about Beast.  What a shame!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one good thing about e-books &#8212; backlists are going to stay in print longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Ana -- Thank you so much for recommending The Rake. It was a great read!

Janine -- I will add those to my list. You know, both the Gaffney and the Ivory you recommended are out of print -- I had to win them on EBay!

It&#039;s inevitable that the shiny and new will attract attention, but it would be a real shame to lose some of these enduring classics forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ana &#8212; Thank you so much for recommending The Rake. It was a great read!</p>
<p>Janine &#8212; I will add those to my list. You know, both the Gaffney and the Ivory you recommended are out of print &#8212; I had to win them on EBay!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s inevitable that the shiny and new will attract attention, but it would be a real shame to lose some of these enduring classics forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-116</guid>
		<description>My favorite Putney is Uncommon Vows.  I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll find it on the AAR Top 100 -- it&#039;s a somewhat controversial book and not everyone&#039;s cuppa -- but I love it.

I also love much of the Fallen Angels series.  One Perfect Rose is the last one, and I&#039;m glad you enjoyed it.  IMO they are even better when read in order.  Shattered Rainbows, the one about Stephen&#039;s brother, is my second favorite of hers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite Putney is Uncommon Vows.  I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll find it on the AAR Top 100 &#8212; it&#8217;s a somewhat controversial book and not everyone&#8217;s cuppa &#8212; but I love it.</p>
<p>I also love much of the Fallen Angels series.  One Perfect Rose is the last one, and I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed it.  IMO they are even better when read in order.  Shattered Rainbows, the one about Stephen&#8217;s brother, is my second favorite of hers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana</title>
		<link>http://www.readreactreview.com/2008/09/06/review-the-rake-mary-jo-putney/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://racyromancereviews.wordpress.com/?p=686#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Oh you read it! Isn&#039;t it , in parts, a wonderful book? I loved how she dealt with Reggie&#039;s addiction , I was on the edge of my seat rooting for him.

I agree with you 100% on that 2/3 of the book is firmly on DIK but the last 1/3 was way too tidy for my tastes.

In any case, I highly Recommend The Rake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh you read it! Isn&#8217;t it , in parts, a wonderful book? I loved how she dealt with Reggie&#8217;s addiction , I was on the edge of my seat rooting for him.</p>
<p>I agree with you 100% on that 2/3 of the book is firmly on DIK but the last 1/3 was way too tidy for my tastes.</p>
<p>In any case, I highly Recommend The Rake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
